Skip to content

Conversation

@jsoonworld
Copy link
Contributor

@jsoonworld jsoonworld commented Feb 7, 2026

Summary

  • 회고 상세 조회(API-013) 응답에 currentUserStatus 필드 추가
  • 현재 사용자의 회고 참여 상태를 반환: NOT_PARTICIPATED / DRAFT / SUBMITTED / ANALYZED
  • RetrospectDetailResponse DTO 및 서비스 로직 수정

Changed Files

  • codes/server/src/domain/retrospect/dto.rs - currentUserStatus 필드 및 enum 추가
  • codes/server/src/domain/retrospect/service.rs - 사용자 상태 조회 로직 추가

Test plan

  • cargo test 통과
  • cargo clippy -- -D warnings 통과
  • dev 머지 후 /health 체크
  • 실제 회고 상세 조회 시 currentUserStatus 필드 확인

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Retrospective detail views now display your current participation status, indicating whether you have not participated, have a draft, have submitted, or have been analyzed.

jsoonworld and others added 2 commits February 7, 2026 12:02
## 변경 사항
- Phase 3: phase-3-code-fix.md → phase-3-ai-diagnostic.md로 변경
- Phase 4: phase-4-pr-creation.md → phase-4-issue-automation.md로 변경
- Phase 5: phase-5-auto-fix-pr.md 신규 추가
- overview.md: 새 Phase 구조 반영
- 각 문서 간 참조 링크 수정

## Phase 구조
1. Event Trigger - 이벤트 수신 및 트리거
2. Issue Analysis - 이슈 분석 및 브랜치 생성
3. AI Diagnostic - Claude API 기반 진단
4. Issue Automation - GitHub Issue 자동 생성
5. Auto-Fix & PR - 자동 수정 및 PR 생성

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- RetrospectDetailResponse에 currentUserStatus 필드 추가
- CurrentUserStatus enum 정의 (NOT_PARTICIPATED/DRAFT/SUBMITTED/ANALYZED)
- member_retro 테이블에서 현재 사용자의 참여 상태 조회

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 7, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new CurrentUserStatus enum is introduced to track participation states (NotParticipated, Draft, Submitted, Analyzed) within retrospectives. The RetrospectDetailResponse is extended to include this field, which is computed from member retrospective memberships in the service layer.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Data Transfer Objects
codes/server/src/domain/retrospect/dto.rs
Added CurrentUserStatus enum with four participation variants and serialization attributes. Extended RetrospectDetailResponse with current_user_status field. Updated tests to validate field initialization and JSON serialization.
Service Logic
codes/server/src/domain/retrospect/service.rs
Implemented status computation logic that maps member retrospective statuses to CurrentUserStatus variants, defaulting to NotParticipated when no match exists. Updated imports and response construction to include the new status field.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

🐰 A status emerged from the retrospect's core,
Where bunnies now track who's done what before,
Draft, Submitted, Analyzed—or not yet in sight,
The current user's journey illuminated bright! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly describes the main change: adding a currentUserStatus field to the retrospect detail retrieval API response, which aligns with the changeset's primary objective.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/api-013-current-user-status

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2026

PR Check Passed

All validation checks have passed:

  • PR title format is valid
  • PR size labels have been applied
  • Path-based labels have been applied

This comment was automatically generated by the PR Check workflow.

@jsoonworld jsoonworld self-assigned this Feb 7, 2026
/// 현재 사용자의 회고 참여 상태
#[derive(Debug, Serialize, ToSchema)]
#[serde(rename_all = "SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE")]
pub enum CurrentUserStatus {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[Suggestion] CurrentUserStatus enum이 main.rs#[derive(OpenApi)] schemas 목록에 등록되어 있지 않습니다. RetrospectDetailResponse가 이 타입을 참조하므로, Swagger UI에서 enum 값이 제대로 표시되지 않을 수 있습니다.

// main.rs schemas에 추가 필요:
CurrentUserStatus,

/// 해당 회고의 질문 리스트 (index 기준 오름차순 정렬, 최대 5개)
pub questions: Vec<RetrospectQuestionItem>,
/// 현재 요청 사용자의 회고 참여 상태
pub current_user_status: CurrentUserStatus,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[Suggestion] API 스펙 문서(docs/api-specs/013-retrospect-detail.md)에 currentUserStatus 필드가 아직 추가되지 않았습니다. 응답 필드 목록과 예시 JSON에 새 필드를 반영해주세요.

| currentUserStatus | string (Enum) | 현재 요청 사용자의 회고 참여 상태 (NOT_PARTICIPATED / DRAFT / SUBMITTED / ANALYZED) |

Copy link
Contributor

@catturtle123 catturtle123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

코드 리뷰 요약

✅ 잘된 점

  • CurrentUserStatus enum이 SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE serde 규칙으로 잘 정의되어 있고, RetrospectStatus 엔티티와 일관된 매핑이 깔끔합니다
  • 기존 member_retros 데이터를 재활용하여 추가 DB 쿼리 없이 상태를 판단하는 효율적인 구현입니다
  • unwrap_or(CurrentUserStatus::NotParticipated) 로 참여하지 않은 사용자 케이스를 안전하게 처리했습니다
  • 테스트에서 Submitted, NotParticipated, Draft 등 다양한 상태를 검증하고 있습니다

📝 개선 제안

  1. OpenAPI 스키마 등록 누락: CurrentUserStatus enum이 main.rs#[derive(OpenApi)] schemas 목록에 등록되지 않았습니다. Swagger UI에서 정상적으로 표시되려면 추가가 필요합니다
  2. API 스펙 문서 미반영: docs/api-specs/013-retrospect-detail.mdcurrentUserStatus 필드가 반영되지 않았습니다. 응답 예시와 필드 목록 업데이트가 필요합니다

ℹ️ 참고

  • PR에 docs/ai-automation/ 문서 변경이 대량 포함되어 있는데 (+2196 -1324), 이 변경들은 currentUserStatus 기능과 무관합니다. 별도 PR로 분리하면 리뷰가 더 수월할 것 같습니다

📁 변경 파일: 12개 (+2240 -1326)

📊 리뷰 요약
🟡 개선 제안: 2건
⚪ 참고: 1건

총 2개 인라인 코멘트 작성됨


🤖 Reviewed by Claude Code

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants