Skip to content

feat: #40 code rabbit#42

Merged
Tnalxmsk merged 5 commits intodevelopfrom
feat/#40/code-rabbit
Feb 25, 2026
Merged

feat: #40 code rabbit#42
Tnalxmsk merged 5 commits intodevelopfrom
feat/#40/code-rabbit

Conversation

@Tnalxmsk
Copy link
Contributor

@Tnalxmsk Tnalxmsk commented Feb 25, 2026

Summary

CodeRabbit를 PR 단계에 도입해 AI 코드 리뷰를 자동화하고, 팀 운영 기준(수용/보류/무시)을 문서화했습니다.
기존 CI(lint/build/e2e)와 충돌 없이 1차 품질 필터로 동작하도록 설정했습니다.

Related Issues

Changes

  • .coderabbit.yaml 추가
    • 자동 리뷰 활성화 (main, develop)
    • 리뷰 우선순위 설정(버그 > 회귀 > 테스트 누락 > 리팩터링 > 스타일)
    • 노이즈 경로 제외(lockfile, generated/report 파일 등)
  • .github/pull_request_template.md 수정
    • CodeRabbit comments reviewed and handled 체크 항목 추가
  • docs/review/coderabbit.md 추가
    • 운영 목적, 우선순위, CI와의 역할 분리, 코멘트 대응 기준(Accept/Defer/Ignore), 샘플 검증 절차 문서화

How To Test

  1. 이 PR 브랜치를 체크아웃한다.
  2. pnpm.cmd exec prettier --check .coderabbit.yaml docs/review/coderabbit.md .github/pull_request_template.md 실행해 포맷 통과를 확인한
    다.
  3. develop 대상 테스트 PR을 생성한다.
  4. CodeRabbit 자동 코멘트 생성 여부를 확인한다.
  5. 코멘트 1개 이상을 Accept/Defer/Ignore로 처리해 운영 플로우를 검증한다.

Checklist

  • Title follows the convention (e.g., feat: add global audio seek guard)
  • Build passes locally (pnpm build)
  • No breaking changes, or they are documented below
  • Tests added/updated where appropriate
  • Docs/comments updated where helpful
  • CodeRabbit comments reviewed and handled (accepted/deferred/ignored with reason)

Breaking Changes (if any)

없음.

Notes For Reviewers

  • CodeRabbit은 사람 리뷰 대체가 아니라 1차 필터 용도입니다.
  • CI 실패 시 CI 수정이 우선이며, CodeRabbit 코멘트는 도메인 맥락과 함께 판단해야 합니다.
  • 오탐이 반복되면 /.coderabbit.yaml의 path_filters, path_instructions를 조정하면 됩니다.

Screenshots / Recordings (if UI changes)

해당 없음.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Configured automated code review system with intelligent filtering rules to prioritize critical issues and reduce noise in the review process.
    • Added operating guide documentation covering code review automation setup, comment handling workflow, and integration procedures.

@Tnalxmsk Tnalxmsk self-assigned this Feb 25, 2026
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 25, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
style-me Ready Ready Preview, Comment Feb 25, 2026 7:38am

@Tnalxmsk Tnalxmsk closed this Feb 25, 2026
@Tnalxmsk Tnalxmsk reopened this Feb 25, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 25, 2026

Warning

Ignoring CodeRabbit configuration file changes. For security, only the configuration from the base branch is applied for open source repositories.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Three new files were added to establish CodeRabbit automated code review: a configuration file (.coderabbit.yaml) specifying review settings and path filters, an updated pull request template with a CodeRabbit checklist item, and documentation detailing the operating guide for CodeRabbit usage and comment handling procedures.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CodeRabbit Configuration
.coderabbit.yaml
Configuration file establishing language (ko-KR), review priority rules (bug risk, regression, tests, maintainability, style), path filters to exclude noise (lockfiles, minified files, build artifacts, coverage), and auto-review settings with incremental reviews enabled on main/develop branches.
Documentation & PR Template
.github/pull_request_template.md, docs/review/coderabbit.md
PR template updated with checklist item for CodeRabbit comment review. New documentation file defines CodeRabbit operating guide, comment handling states (Accept/Defer/Ignore), verification workflows, GitHub App setup steps, and guidance for adjusting path filters.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

🐰 A code-reviewing rabbit hops in with care,
Scanning each PR through the digital air,
Bugs and regressions beware!
With filters set and wisdom shared,
Quality checks are now prepared! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'Feat/#40/code rabbit' is partially related to the changeset but lacks clarity and convention. It includes the issue number and feature name but is vague and does not follow standard commit conventions (e.g., 'feat: integrate CodeRabbit for automated PR reviews'). Revise the title to follow convention and be more descriptive, e.g., 'feat: integrate CodeRabbit for automated PR code reviews' or 'feat: add CodeRabbit automation and documentation'.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description check ✅ Passed The PR description is comprehensive and follows the template structure. It includes summary in Korean, related issues (#40), detailed changes, testing instructions, checklist completion, and notes for reviewers, though written primarily in Korean.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed The PR successfully addresses all coding requirements from issue #40: CodeRabbit GitHub App integration via .coderabbit.yaml config, review priority ordering, noise path exclusions, PR template checkbox addition, and operational documentation with comment handling rules (Accept/Defer/Ignore).
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed All changes are directly aligned with issue #40 scope: configuration file (.coderabbit.yaml), PR template update, and operational documentation. No CI pipeline overhauls, security scanners, or automated suggestion application are included.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/#40/code-rabbit

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.coderabbit.yaml (1)

14-25: Redundant '**' include-all entry in path_filters.

When path_filters contains only exclusion patterns (prefixed with !), CodeRabbit implicitly includes all other files — the leading '**' on Line 15 is unnecessary and can be removed to keep the config minimal.

♻️ Proposed cleanup
  path_filters:
-   - '**'
    - '!pnpm-lock.yaml'
    - '!**/package-lock.json'
    - '!**/yarn.lock'
    - '!**/*.min.js'
    - '!**/*.map'
    - '!**/*.snap'
    - '!**/test-results/**'
    - '!**/playwright-report/**'
    - '!**/.next/**'
    - '!**/coverage/**'
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 14 - 25, The path_filters list includes an
unnecessary include-all entry ('**') along with only exclusion patterns; remove
the redundant "'**'" entry from path_filters so the exclusions (the '!**/...'
patterns) are sufficient and the config is minimal—update the path_filters block
to omit "'**'" while keeping all the '!...' patterns intact.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@docs/review/coderabbit.md`:
- Around line 70-76: Replace the hardcoded repository name "style-me" in the
"GitHub App Setup Steps" section with a generic placeholder or note that the
repository is repo-specific; update step 3 so it reads something like
"<this-repository>" or "your-repository" (where "style-me" currently appears)
and add a short parenthetical reminding users to select the correct repo for
their fork; keep the reference to /.coderabbit.yaml as-is.

---

Nitpick comments:
In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Around line 14-25: The path_filters list includes an unnecessary include-all
entry ('**') along with only exclusion patterns; remove the redundant "'**'"
entry from path_filters so the exclusions (the '!**/...' patterns) are
sufficient and the config is minimal—update the path_filters block to omit
"'**'" while keeping all the '!...' patterns intact.

ℹ️ Review info

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7d186fe and e5e789d.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .coderabbit.yaml
  • .github/pull_request_template.md
  • docs/review/coderabbit.md

Comment on lines +70 to +76
## GitHub App Setup Steps

1. Install `CodeRabbit` GitHub App from GitHub Marketplace.
2. Select the owner (org or personal account).
3. Grant repository access to `style-me` (recommended: selected repositories).
4. Ensure `/.coderabbit.yaml` exists on default branch.
5. Create a test PR and confirm auto comments are posted.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Hardcoded repository name style-me may become stale.

Line 74 names the repository explicitly. If this guide is ever referenced from another repo or forked, the name will need to be updated manually. Consider making the reference generic (e.g., <this-repository>) or noting that the name is repo-specific.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@docs/review/coderabbit.md` around lines 70 - 76, Replace the hardcoded
repository name "style-me" in the "GitHub App Setup Steps" section with a
generic placeholder or note that the repository is repo-specific; update step 3
so it reads something like "<this-repository>" or "your-repository" (where
"style-me" currently appears) and add a short parenthetical reminding users to
select the correct repo for their fork; keep the reference to /.coderabbit.yaml
as-is.

@Tnalxmsk Tnalxmsk merged commit 9c78cd0 into develop Feb 25, 2026
4 checks passed
@Tnalxmsk Tnalxmsk changed the title Feat/#40/code rabbit feat: #40 code rabbit Feb 25, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[chore] CodeRabbit 도입으로 PR AI 코드 리뷰 자동화 구축

1 participant