-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename ResultOrder
enum to OrderBy
#185
Conversation
ResultOrder
enum to OrderBy
WalkthroughThe changes involve renaming the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Sources/AblyChat/Messages.swift (1)
Line range hint
71-77
: Note: Stable wire protocol maintainedThe rename from
ResultOrder
toOrderBy
is purely for API clarity. The underlying wire protocol remains stable as the enum cases still map to the same direction values ("forwards"/"backwards").
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Sources/AblyChat/Messages.swift
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Sources/AblyChat/Messages.swift (3)
41-41
: LGTM!
The property type update is consistent with the enum rename.
Line range hint 46-51
: LGTM! Consider updating documentation
The initializer changes are consistent with the enum rename. However, we should verify if there's any associated documentation that needs to be updated.
✅ Verification successful
No documentation updates needed for the enum rename
Since our searches didn't find any references to "ResultOrder" in documentation files or source code comments, it appears there's no documentation that needs to be updated. The enum rename from ResultOrder
to OrderBy
is clean and doesn't have any lingering documentation references.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any documentation files that might reference ResultOrder
fd -e md | xargs rg "ResultOrder"
# Check for DocC documentation
fd -e docc | xargs rg "ResultOrder"
Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for any documentation or comments mentioning ResultOrder
# This includes source files as they might contain documentation comments
rg -i "resultorder" --type-add 'swift:*.swift' --type swift -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 69
33-36
: Verify breaking API change impact
The rename from ResultOrder
to OrderBy
is a breaking API change that could affect downstream dependencies.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, btw why oldestFirst is the default? In chat apps I believe loading the newest messages first by default makes more sense.
where are you seeing that? |
Per CHADR-074.
Summary by CodeRabbit