Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename ResultOrder enum to OrderBy #185

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2024

Conversation

lawrence-forooghian
Copy link
Collaborator

@lawrence-forooghian lawrence-forooghian commented Dec 9, 2024

Per CHADR-074.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated terminology for message ordering, enhancing clarity in the user interface.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Ensured consistency in the usage of message ordering across the application.

@lawrence-forooghian lawrence-forooghian changed the title Rename ResultOrder enum to OrderBy Rename ResultOrder enum to OrderBy Dec 9, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve renaming the ResultOrder enum to OrderBy within the QueryOptions struct in the Sources/AblyChat/Messages.swift file. This includes updating the property orderBy to use the new enum type and modifying the initializer of QueryOptions to accept the new type. The cases within the enum, oldestFirst and newestFirst, remain unchanged, and there are no alterations to the logic or control flow of the existing code.

Changes

File Change Summary
Sources/AblyChat/Messages.swift Renamed ResultOrder enum to OrderBy, updated orderBy property type, and modified initializer to accept OrderBy type.

Poem

🐇 In the land of code where rabbits play,
The ResultOrder found a new way.
Now OrderBy leads the hop,
With oldestFirst and newestFirst on top.
A change so bright, it makes us cheer,
For clearer paths, we hold so dear! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Sources/AblyChat/Messages.swift (1)

Line range hint 71-77: Note: Stable wire protocol maintained

The rename from ResultOrder to OrderBy is purely for API clarity. The underlying wire protocol remains stable as the enum cases still map to the same direction values ("forwards"/"backwards").

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ee6194b and e2040e3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Sources/AblyChat/Messages.swift (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Sources/AblyChat/Messages.swift (3)

41-41: LGTM!

The property type update is consistent with the enum rename.


Line range hint 46-51: LGTM! Consider updating documentation

The initializer changes are consistent with the enum rename. However, we should verify if there's any associated documentation that needs to be updated.

✅ Verification successful

No documentation updates needed for the enum rename

Since our searches didn't find any references to "ResultOrder" in documentation files or source code comments, it appears there's no documentation that needs to be updated. The enum rename from ResultOrder to OrderBy is clean and doesn't have any lingering documentation references.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any documentation files that might reference ResultOrder
fd -e md | xargs rg "ResultOrder"

# Check for DocC documentation
fd -e docc | xargs rg "ResultOrder"

Length of output: 69


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for any documentation or comments mentioning ResultOrder
# This includes source files as they might contain documentation comments
rg -i "resultorder" --type-add 'swift:*.swift' --type swift -A 3 -B 3

Length of output: 69


33-36: Verify breaking API change impact

The rename from ResultOrder to OrderBy is a breaking API change that could affect downstream dependencies.

Copy link
Collaborator

@maratal maratal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, btw why oldestFirst is the default? In chat apps I believe loading the newest messages first by default makes more sense.

@lawrence-forooghian
Copy link
Collaborator Author

btw why oldestFirst is the default?

where are you seeing that?

@lawrence-forooghian lawrence-forooghian merged commit 2ffb663 into main Dec 9, 2024
12 checks passed
@lawrence-forooghian lawrence-forooghian deleted the rename-ResultOrder-to-OrderBy branch December 9, 2024 16:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants