Skip to content

Conversation

@pxrl
Copy link
Collaborator

@pxrl pxrl commented Dec 4, 2025

This implementation seems prone to misreporting, and invalid fills is supported separately anyway, so this method should be superfluous.

This implementation seems prone to misreporting, and invalid fills is
supported separately anyway, so this method should be superfluous.
@pxrl pxrl added the do not merge Don't merge until label is removed label Dec 4, 2025
@pxrl
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pxrl commented Dec 4, 2025

nb. throwing this up for now with do not merge. It has some behavioural quirks that I want to understand before we remove it.

Copy link
Contributor

@dijanin-brat dijanin-brat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is good to merge!
This is a leftover from SVM launch days and its not even working properly :) the reportInvalidFills is reporting on both EVM and SVM invalid fills

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do not merge Don't merge until label is removed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants