-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(*): Add cities list to make label #13
Open
aoudiamoncef
wants to merge
1
commit into
addok:master
Choose a base branch
from
aoudiamoncef:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -37,13 +37,11 @@ | |
# Match "rue", "boulevard", "bd", etc. | ||
TYPES_PATTERN = re.compile(r'\b(' + TYPES_REGEX + r')\b', flags=re.IGNORECASE) | ||
|
||
|
||
# Match number + ordinal, once glued by glue_ordinal (or typed like this in the | ||
# search string, for example "6bis", "234ter"). | ||
FOLD_PATTERN = re.compile(r'^(\d{1,4})(' + ORDINAL_REGEX + ')$', | ||
flags=re.IGNORECASE) | ||
|
||
|
||
# Match number once cleaned by glue_ordinal and fold_ordinal (for example | ||
# "6b", "234t"…) | ||
NUMBER_PATTERN = re.compile(r'\b\d{1,4}[a-z]?\b', flags=re.IGNORECASE) | ||
|
@@ -139,28 +137,37 @@ def make_labels(helper, result): | |
housenumber = getattr(result, 'housenumber', None) | ||
|
||
def add(labels, label): | ||
labels.insert(0, label) | ||
labels.add(label) | ||
if housenumber: | ||
label = '{} {}'.format(housenumber, label) | ||
labels.insert(0, label) | ||
labels.add(label) | ||
|
||
raw_cities = result._rawattr("city") | ||
|
||
if isinstance(raw_cities, list): | ||
cities = raw_cities | ||
else: | ||
cities = [raw_cities] | ||
|
||
city = result.city | ||
postcode = result.postcode | ||
names = result._rawattr('name') | ||
if not isinstance(names, (list, tuple)): | ||
names = [names] | ||
for name in names: | ||
labels = [] | ||
label = name | ||
if postcode and result.type == 'municipality': | ||
add(labels, '{} {}'.format(label, postcode)) | ||
add(labels, '{} {}'.format(postcode, label)) | ||
add(labels, label) | ||
if city and city != label: | ||
add(labels, '{} {}'.format(label, city)) | ||
if postcode: | ||
label = '{} {}'.format(label, postcode) | ||
add(labels, label) | ||
label = '{} {}'.format(label, city) | ||
add(labels, label) | ||
result.labels.extend(labels) | ||
names = getattr(result, 'name', None) | ||
labels = set() | ||
|
||
for city in cities: | ||
if not isinstance(names, (list, tuple)): | ||
names = [names] | ||
for name in names: | ||
label = name | ||
if postcode and result.type == 'municipality': | ||
add(labels, '{} {}'.format(label, postcode)) | ||
add(labels, '{} {}'.format(postcode, label)) | ||
add(labels, label) | ||
if city and city != label: | ||
add(labels, '{} {}'.format(label, city)) | ||
if postcode: | ||
label = '{} {}'.format(label, postcode) | ||
add(labels, label) | ||
label = '{} {}'.format(label, city) | ||
add(labels, label) | ||
|
||
result.labels.extend(sorted(list(labels), key=lambda item: (len(item), item), reverse=True)) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ici je pense qu'on perd en efficacité: il faut trouver la bonne heuristique pour mettre en premier les labels les plus standards, ce qui était plus ou moins ce que le code essayait de faire. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Faut sûrement checker plus loin dans la chaîne si le fait d'avoir une liste pour
city
est bien pris en charge, notamment pour le libellé final du résultat, et y compris les clients JS.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello,
Nous avons ce code en production depuis 2 ans, j'avoue qu'il répond aux besoins mais la performance en soi, n'es pas très importante dans notre cas.