Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Separate ConfigMap templating and creation #259

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 10, 2024
Merged

Separate ConfigMap templating and creation #259

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 10, 2024

Conversation

lllamnyp
Copy link
Collaborator

@lllamnyp lllamnyp commented Aug 12, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

This PR is part of a stacked pull request on top of #252. The big picture is documented in #181 and #207.

This commit factors out the building of a corev1.ConfigMap struct into a separate function, while leaving the logic of determining key parameters, such as the initial cluster, state, etc, as well as sending the request to the k8s API server in the already existing CreateOrUpdate function. This will be useful in the future, when this logic will be moved out of the factory library and into the reconciliation loop.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved modularity and clarity in cluster state management with the introduction of a new helper function for creating configuration maps.

  • Refactor

    • Simplified the CreateOrUpdateClusterStateConfigMap function for better readability and maintainability by delegating the configuration map creation.

This was referenced Aug 12, 2024
Merged
Merged
Open
kvaps pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2024
@lllamnyp
Add a helper set library to facilitate implementation of the new heal…
28b0def 
…th check procedure (#252)

This is the first PR in a series of [stacked
PRs](https://www.stacking.dev/), aimed ultimately at implementing the
features described in #181 and #207. The next PR in the stack can be
found at #259.
Base automatically changed from feat/new-status-check to main August 15, 2024 09:30
@lllamnyp
Separate ConfigMap templating and creation
cb2a88f 
This commit factors out the building of a corev1.ConfigMap struct into a separate function, while leaving the logic of determining key parameters, such as the initial cluster, state, etc, as well as sending the request to the k8s API server in the already existing CreateOrUpdate function. This will be useful in the future, when this logic will be moved out of the factory library and into the reconciliation loop.
@lllamnyp lllamnyp force-pushed the feat/new-status-check-pt2 branch from 6993adf to cb2a88f Compare September 10, 2024 15:56
@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 10, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The changes involve a refactor of the CreateOrUpdateClusterStateConfigMap function in the internal/controller/factory/configmap.go file. The logic for constructing the initialCluster string has been moved to a new helper function called TemplateClusterStateConfigMap. This refactoring simplifies the original function by delegating the creation of the ConfigMap, thereby enhancing code readability and maintainability.

Changes

Files Change Summary
internal/controller/factory/configmap.go Refactored CreateOrUpdateClusterStateConfigMap to use a new helper function TemplateClusterStateConfigMap for creating ConfigMap. Added the new function to encapsulate the logic for constructing the initialCluster string.

Poem

🐇 In the code where clusters grow,
A helper function steals the show!
With strings and maps now neatly spun,
The refactor's done, let’s have some fun!
Readable, clear, like a rabbit's hop,
Code so fine, it’ll never stop! 🐇

Tip

Announcements
  • The review status is no longer posted as a separate comment when there are no actionable or nitpick comments. In such cases, the review status is included in the walkthrough comment.
  • We have updated our review workflow to use the Anthropic's Claude family of models. Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.
  • Possibly related PRs: Walkthrough comment now includes a list of potentially related PRs to help you recall past context. Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.
  • Suggested labels: CodeRabbit can now suggest labels by learning from your past PRs in the walkthrough comment. You can also provide custom labeling instructions in the UI or configuration file.
  • Possibly related PRs, automatic label suggestions based on past PRs, learnings, and possibly related issues require data opt-in (enabled by default).
Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 51131a1 and cb2a88f.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • internal/controller/factory/configmap.go (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
internal/controller/factory/configmap.go (2)

43-45: LGTM! The refactoring improves code readability and maintainability.

The changes to simplify the logic for determining the cluster state and delegating the ConfigMap creation to a new helper function are approved. This refactoring enhances the code by separating concerns and improving readability.

Also applies to: 47-47

69-97: LGTM! The new helper function is implemented correctly.

The TemplateClusterStateConfigMap function is a well-designed helper function that encapsulates the logic for constructing the ConfigMap object. It takes the necessary parameters to generate the initialCluster string and sets the appropriate metadata and data for the ConfigMap.

The function aligns with the refactoring goal of separating the ConfigMap creation from the main function, improving code modularity and readability.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@lllamnyp lllamnyp merged commit e00e6cb into main Sep 10, 2024
9 checks passed
@lllamnyp lllamnyp deleted the feat/new-status-check-pt2 branch September 10, 2024 16:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Kirill-Garbar Kirill-Garbar Kirill-Garbar approved these changes

@sircthulhu sircthulhu sircthulhu approved these changes

@sergeyshevch sergeyshevch Awaiting requested review from sergeyshevch

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
controllers
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@lllamnyp @sircthulhu @Kirill-Garbar