Update the neutral recycling regression test; with a resolution of 22… #931
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…4x16x8 it reproduces the neutral temperature in figure 3b of T. N. Bernard, et al. PoP 29, 052501 (2022) even just run to 3/10 of Lz/cs (the original test was ran to 3 Lz/cs). Reduced t_end so it runs in 40 s.
tnbernard
approved these changes
Jan 22, 2026
| double n_src = pow(n0,2.0)*8e-21; // Source number density. | ||
| double T_src = 10.0*eV; // Source temperature. | ||
|
|
||
| int Nz = 224; // Number of cells along magnetic field. |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would reduce the Nz to 64 to reduce the run time. Even though it may produce some negativity, we know that the high resolution case matches the Bernard 2022 PoP paper now.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…4x16x8 it reproduces the neutral temperature in figure 3b of T. N. Bernard, et al. PoP 29, 052501 (2022) even just run to 3/10 of Lz/cs (the original test was ran to 3 Lz/cs). Reduced t_end so it runs in 40 s.