README: Add Communication section with Forum information

[Andersson007]

SUMMARY

Dear maintainers,
As a part of the Consolidating Ansible discussion platforms initiative, this PR adds the communication section template defined by the community to the README. Similar PRs are being raised across all included collections under the ansible-collection org for now.

• If you have your forum group and/or tags related to the collection, please update corresponding lines by suggesting changes to the PR.
• If the collection is not present on the Ansible forum yet, please check out the existing tags and groups - use what suits your collection. If there is no appropritate tag and group yet, please request one. Then update corresponding lines by suggesting changes to the PR.
• Presence in the forum will soon likely become a part of the Collection inclusion requirements.

ISSUE TYPE

• Docs Pull Request

COMPONENT NAME

README.md

[Andersson007]

ready for review

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 73.40%. Comparing base (42d35bd) to head (eb0067a).
Report is 17 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #673      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   73.68%   73.40%   -0.29%     
==========================================
  Files           6        6              
  Lines         935      940       +5     
  Branches      144      145       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits          689      690       +1     
- Misses        210      211       +1     
- Partials       36       39       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Andersson007]

@rhysmeister hello, thanks for reviewing and merging. I should've highlight somehow in the changed file, not only in the description, that the following lines should've been updated before merging.
OK, i'll create a forum tag for the users w/o a request and submit a quick fix. If you need a forum group as a WG, please let me know

[rhysmeister]

My fault... really busy at the moment and obviousl ynot paying attention as much as I should. I'lll fix it.

[Andersson007]

@rhysmeister please take a look #674

[Andersson007]

it's for user-to-user interactions mostly but maintainers can also subscribe if they wish to take part in such conversations, FYI