Skip to content

Conversation

pyansys-ci-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pyansys-ci-bot pyansys-ci-bot commented May 26, 2025

This PR was migrated from a fork to allow secrets to run in workflows. Check the original PR for more details.

Closes #3949

Summary by Sourcery

Documentation:

  • Insert two 'asdf' lines below badges in README.md

@pyansys-ci-bot pyansys-ci-bot requested a review from a team as a code owner May 26, 2025 19:50
Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented May 26, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

This PR migrates the original forked changes and introduces a minor update by inserting placeholder text into the project’s README without impacting functionality.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Added placeholder lines to README
  • Inserted 'asdf' on two new lines
README.md

Assessment against linked issues

Issue Objective Addressed Explanation

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@ansys-reviewer-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying:

@ansys-reviewer-bot review

@github-actions github-actions bot added the enhancement Improve any current implemented feature label May 26, 2025
@germa89 germa89 closed this May 26, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 26, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.28%. Comparing base (232d59a) to head (86d4c38).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3950      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.33%   88.28%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         187      187              
  Lines       14906    14906              
==========================================
- Hits        13167    13160       -7     
- Misses       1739     1746       +7     
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@germa89 germa89 deleted the migration/pr-3949 branch June 16, 2025 10:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improve any current implemented feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants