Preserve duplicate keys for scan resumptions #5957
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
DomGarguilo
added
blocker
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #5951
When a scan contained multiple duplicate keys and the scan broke or cut before returning all of those duplicates, the remainder of those duplicate keys were dropped and not returned when the scan resumed. This happened because when the scan cut, we did not store the
MemKeywhich contains an additional field,kvCountwhich when used, distinguishes otherwise duplicate keys. When we resumed the scan without these MemKey details, the scanned picked back up after the logical key we left off on, which incorrectly skips the remaining duplicate keys in the scan. We now store the full MemKey and when the scan resumes on the same key, skips only the one entry we already returned so the other duplicate keys are correctly returned now.The new test case fails without the rest of the changes and passes with them.