[AMORO-2979] Support K8S Pod Template From KubernetesOptimizer (#2979)

[wangyuxiang123]

Why are the changes needed?

Close #2979.

Brief change log

• Support K8S Pod Template From KubernetesOptimizer
• Remove redundant comments

How was this patch tested?

• Add some test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible
• Add screenshots for manual tests if appropriate
• Run test locally before making a pull request

Documentation

• Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
• If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)

[czy006]

@wangyuxiang123

Thanks for your initial contribution, your code needs to make the following adjustments

• code needs to have relevant unit tests to ensure that it does not affect existing functionality
• use the spotless plugin to format the code and remove the comment code

[czy006]

Thank you for your first contribution, I will give you some suggestions for modifications

[czy006]

Add PodTemplate Doc with Deploy AMS On Kubernetes

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 22.48%. Comparing base (f6e74aa) to head (1ad71fe).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (f6e74aa) and HEAD (1ad71fe). Click for more details.

HEAD has 2 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (f6e74aa)	HEAD (1ad71fe)
core	2	0

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #3072      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     29.10%   22.48%   -6.62%     
+ Complexity     3647     2283    -1364     
============================================
  Files           567      379     -188     
  Lines         47025    38022    -9003     
  Branches       6193     5442     -751     
============================================
- Hits          13686     8549    -5137     
+ Misses        32359    28736    -3623     
+ Partials        980      737     -243     

Flag	Coverage Δ
core	?
trino	22.48% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[czy006]

I give some suggestions for modifications

[czy006]

LGTM