Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a portable Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
R: @Abacn can you take a look? |
|
Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control. If you'd like to restart, comment |
| // - Representation type: INT64 | ||
| // - A date without a timezone, represented by the number of days | ||
| // since the epoch. | ||
| DATE = 8 [(org.apache.beam.model.pipeline.v1.beam_urn) = |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider adding TIME as well?
| bytes <-----> BYTES | ||
| ByteString ------> BYTES | ||
| Timestamp <-----> LogicalType(urn="beam:logical_type:micros_instant:v1") | ||
| datetime.date <---> LogicalType(urn="beam:logical_type:date:v1") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Most Java SDK's IO uses joda data and time, and are serialized as joda timestamp. Then JDBCDateType and JDBCTimeType were created to accomadate them.
WIth the introducation of "ture" portable data/time logical types, we need to make sure it doesn't break existing Python JdbcIO. We can run https://github.com/apache/beam/actions/workflows/beam_PostCommit_Python_Xlang_Gcp_Direct.yml against this PR to test
| return Timestamp(seconds=int(value.seconds), micros=int(value.micros)) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| # @LogicalType._register_internal |
There was already a Java Date logical type. This PR creates an equivalent Python logical type and adds it to the Beam model to standardize it