BIGTOP-3907: Use self compiled leveldbjni dependency for Spark on aarch64 #1086
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kevinw66
commented
Feb 7, 2023
| rm -rf ${LEVELDB_HOME} | ||
| fi | ||
| ## BIGTOP-3907 | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These can be removed if we already built Hadoop
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This issue was brought about by the leveldbjni dependency as you mentioned.
You mean if we build Hadoop first on the same node, it appears there are no leveldbjni dependency issues with Spark, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, but we still need to delete profile aarch64 for Spark
kevinw66
changed the title
|
AFAIK, Spark is moving to rocksdb in recently version, and leveldb is not a hard dependency, instead of a workaround for leveldb, how do you think switching to rocksdb by changing the default configurations? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of PR
How was this patch tested?
For code changes: