Skip to content

Conversation

@Smith-Cruise
Copy link
Contributor

@Smith-Cruise Smith-Cruise commented Nov 30, 2025

Which issue does this PR close?

It's very simple, do I need to propose an issue?

  • Closes #.

Rationale for this change

We don't need to clone ExectuionPlan when repartitioned() didn't happened.

What changes are included in this PR?

Very simple, just remove extra clone().

Are these changes tested?

Compile passed.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No

Signed-off-by: Smith Cruise <chendingchao1@126.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the datasource Changes to the datasource crate label Nov 30, 2025
@crepererum crepererum added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 1, 2025
Merged via the queue into apache:main with commit 901aaca Dec 1, 2025
28 checks passed
ShashidharM0118 pushed a commit to ShashidharM0118/datafusion that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2025
## Which issue does this PR close?

<!--
We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases.
You can link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example
`Closes apache#123` indicates that this PR will close issue apache#123.
-->
It's very simple, do I need to propose an issue?
- Closes #.

## Rationale for this change

<!--
Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly
in the issue then this section is not needed.
Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand
your changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.
-->

We don't need to clone `ExectuionPlan` when `repartitioned()` didn't
happened.

## What changes are included in this PR?

<!--
There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it
is sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this
PR.
-->

Very simple, just remove extra `clone()`.

## Are these changes tested?

<!--
We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code

If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example,
are they covered by existing tests)?
-->

Compile passed.

## Are there any user-facing changes?

<!--
If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be
updated before approving the PR.
-->

<!--
If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please add the `api
change` label.
-->

No

Signed-off-by: Smith Cruise <chendingchao1@126.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

datasource Changes to the datasource crate

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants