-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
HIVE-28801 Iceberg: Refactor HMS table parameter setting to be able to reuse #5676
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
2bccf44
to
f0ea137
Compare
iceberg/iceberg-catalog/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/hive/HMSTablePropertyHelper.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
iceberg/iceberg-catalog/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/hive/HMSTablePropertyHelper.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
iceberg/iceberg-catalog/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/hive/HMSTablePropertyHelper.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
iceberg/iceberg-catalog/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/hive/HiveTableOperations.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There are test failures with error like |
LGTM +1, pending tests and #5676 (comment) |
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
public static void setSchema(Schema schema, Map<String, String> parameters, long maxHiveTablePropertySize) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we declare public methods at the top of class declaration?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1, pending green build
… reuse Change-Id: I307f09032d1ed8ee5a6eea78394939d2de48b54b
|
…to reuse (Zoltán Rátkai, reviewed by Denys Kuzmenko, Dmitriy Fingerman) Closes apache#5676, Iceberg #12461
HIVE-28801 Iceberg: Refactor HMS table parameter setting to be able to reuse
Change-Id: I317cee162f1bc39ee9e385bd3ac82bea3414a06e
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Refactoring HMS table parameter setting to be able to reuse
Why are the changes needed?
To be able to reuse existing code.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
Is the change a dependency upgrade?
No.
How was this patch tested?
Unit test.