backport #11301(rowconverter) to Flink 1.19 and 1.18#11826
backport #11301(rowconverter) to Flink 1.19 and 1.18#11826abharath9 wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
|
@abharath9 is this a clean back port? It is marked as a draft now. is it ready for review? |
|
@stevenzwu It is not yet ready for review. I want #11838 to merge before backporting. |
|
I don't understand why this back port depends on PR #11838 , which seems to be a operate issue. |
|
This pull request has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s incorrect or this pull request requires a review, please simply write any comment. If closed, you can revive the PR at any time and @mention a reviewer or discuss it on the dev@iceberg.apache.org list. Thank you for your contributions. |
|
This pull request has been closed due to lack of activity. This is not a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It is just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable. If you think that is incorrect, or the pull request requires review, you can revive the PR at any time. |
|
What is the state of this backport @abharath9? |
|
This pull request has been marked as stale due to 30 days of inactivity. It will be closed in 1 week if no further activity occurs. If you think that’s incorrect or this pull request requires a review, please simply write any comment. If closed, you can revive the PR at any time and @mention a reviewer or discuss it on the dev@iceberg.apache.org list. Thank you for your contributions. |
|
This pull request has been closed due to lack of activity. This is not a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It is just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable. If you think that is incorrect, or the pull request requires review, you can revive the PR at any time. |
|
@abharath9: Do we need this backport? |
|
@abharath9 @pvary @stevenzwu Since this backport has been kept as a Draft with no response for a long time, can I open a new PR to continue and finish this backport? |
|
Thanks @Guosmilesmile! |
4 participants
No description provided.