Migrate to arrow-go #83
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| @@ -15,43 +15,43 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| module github.com/apache/spark-connect-go/v35 | |||
|
|
|||
| go 1.21 | |||
| go 1.22.0 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this change needed? Do we need to update the go version at the same time?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| @@ -115,5 +115,5 @@ jobs: | |||
| - name: golangci-lint | |||
| uses: golangci/golangci-lint-action@v6 | |||
| with: | |||
| version: v1.59 | |||
|
Wow, v18.0.0 is released formally. |
|
Looks good, I tested locally as well. Thanks a lot! |
grundprinzip
approved these changes
Oct 24, 2024
|
merging to master |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The Arrow Go has its own repo now, see
apache/arrow#44293
Why are the changes needed?
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?