Activision & callofduty.com share credentials

[ellieayla]

Overall Checklist

• I agree to the project's Developer Certificate of Origin
• The top-level JSON objects are sorted alphabetically
• There are no open pull requests for the same update

for password-rules.json

• The given rule isn't particularly standard and obvious for password managers
• Generated passwords have been tested from this rule using the Password Rules Validation Tool
• Information has been included about the website's requirements (eg. screenshots, error messages, steps during experimentation, etc.)
• The PR isn't documenting something that would be a common practice among password managers (e.g. minimal length of 6)

for change-password-URLs.json

• There is no Well-Known URL for Changing Passwords (https://example.com/.well-known/change-password)
• The URL either makes the experience better or no worse than being directed to just the domain in a non-logged-in state

for shared-credentials.json

• There's evidence the domains are currently related (SSL certificates, DNS entries, valid links between sites, legal documents etc.)
• If using shared, the new group serves login pages on each of the included domains, and those login pages accept accounts from the others. (For example, we wouldn't use a shared association from google.co.il to google.com, because google.co.il redirects to accounts.google.com for sign in.)
• If using from and to, the new group, the from domain(s) redirect to the to domain to log in.

for shared-credentials-historical.json

• You believe that the domains were associated at some point in the past and can explain that relationship

[ellieayla]

I'm not sure whether sorting different is required, but otherwise I think this is correct. Feedback appreciated.

[rmondello]

@ellieayla The change does look good to me, but you were right — it's not sorted properly. Would you consider applying the quirk to all of activision.com?

[ellieayla]

I don't find a login page directly on activision.com anywhere, only on the subdomain. It doesn't seem to make sense being sorted under S (but I think that's what the test demands). C? Dunno.

[rmondello]

Thanks for the contribution @ellieayla!