forked from greenplum-db/diskquota-archive
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Merge pull request #11 from arenadata/2.1.0-sync
2.1.0 sync
- Loading branch information
Showing
82 changed files
with
5,189 additions
and
991 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@ | ||
# Security Release Process | ||
|
||
Greenplum Database has adopted this security disclosure and response policy to | ||
ensure we responsibly handle critical issues. | ||
|
||
## Reporting a Vulnerability - Private Disclosure Process | ||
|
||
Security is of the highest importance and all security vulnerabilities or | ||
suspected security vulnerabilities should be reported to Greenplum Database | ||
privately, to minimize attacks against current users of Greenplum Database | ||
before they are fixed. Vulnerabilities will be investigated and patched on the | ||
next patch (or minor) release as soon as possible. This information could be | ||
kept entirely internal to the project. | ||
|
||
If you know of a publicly disclosed security vulnerability for Greenplum | ||
Database, please **IMMEDIATELY** contact the Greenplum Database project team | ||
(security@greenplum.org). | ||
|
||
**IMPORTANT: Do not file public issues on GitHub for security vulnerabilities!** | ||
|
||
To report a vulnerability or a security-related issue, please contact the email | ||
address with the details of the vulnerability. The email will be fielded by the | ||
Greenplum Database project team. Emails will be addressed promptly, including a | ||
detailed plan to investigate the issue and any potential workarounds to perform | ||
in the meantime. Do not report non-security-impacting bugs through this | ||
channel. Use [GitHub issues](https://github.com/greenplum-db/gpdb/issues) | ||
instead. | ||
|
||
## Proposed Email Content | ||
|
||
Provide a descriptive subject line and in the body of the email include the | ||
following information: | ||
|
||
* Basic identity information, such as your name and your affiliation or company. | ||
* Detailed steps to reproduce the vulnerability (POC scripts, screenshots, and | ||
logs are all helpful to us). | ||
* Description of the effects of the vulnerability on Greenplum Database and the | ||
related hardware and software configurations, so that the Greenplum Database | ||
project team can reproduce it. | ||
* How the vulnerability affects Greenplum Database usage and an estimation of | ||
the attack surface, if there is one. | ||
* List other projects or dependencies that were used in conjunction with | ||
Greenplum Database to produce the vulnerability. | ||
|
||
## When to report a vulnerability | ||
|
||
* When you think Greenplum Database has a potential security vulnerability. | ||
* When you suspect a potential vulnerability but you are unsure that it impacts | ||
Greenplum Database. | ||
* When you know of or suspect a potential vulnerability on another project that | ||
is used by Greenplum Database. | ||
|
||
## Patch, Release, and Disclosure | ||
|
||
The Greenplum Database project team will respond to vulnerability reports as | ||
follows: | ||
|
||
1. The Greenplum project team will investigate the vulnerability and determine | ||
its effects and criticality. | ||
2. If the issue is not deemed to be a vulnerability, the Greenplum project team | ||
will follow up with a detailed reason for rejection. | ||
3. The Greenplum project team will initiate a conversation with the reporter | ||
promptly. | ||
4. If a vulnerability is acknowledged and the timeline for a fix is determined, | ||
the Greenplum project team will work on a plan to communicate with the | ||
appropriate community, including identifying mitigating steps that affected | ||
users can take to protect themselves until the fix is rolled out. | ||
5. The Greenplum project team will also create a | ||
[CVSS](https://www.first.org/cvss/specification-document) using the [CVSS | ||
Calculator](https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.0). The Greenplum project | ||
team makes the final call on the calculated CVSS; it is better to move quickly | ||
than making the CVSS perfect. Issues may also be reported to | ||
[Mitre](https://cve.mitre.org/) using this [scoring | ||
calculator](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln-metrics/cvss/v3-calculator). The CVE will | ||
initially be set to private. | ||
6. The Greenplum project team will work on fixing the vulnerability and perform | ||
internal testing before preparing to roll out the fix. | ||
7. A public disclosure date is negotiated by the Greenplum Database project | ||
team, and the bug submitter. We prefer to fully disclose the bug as soon as | ||
possible once a user mitigation or patch is available. It is reasonable to | ||
delay disclosure when the bug or the fix is not yet fully understood, or the | ||
solution is not well-tested. The timeframe for disclosure is from immediate | ||
(especially if it’s already publicly known) to a few weeks. The Greenplum | ||
Database project team holds the final say when setting a public disclosure | ||
date. | ||
8. Once the fix is confirmed, the Greenplum project team will patch the | ||
vulnerability in the next patch or minor release, and backport a patch release | ||
into earlier supported releases as necessary. Upon release of the patched | ||
version of Greenplum Database, we will follow the **Public Disclosure | ||
Process**. | ||
|
||
## Public Disclosure Process | ||
|
||
The Greenplum project team publishes a [public | ||
advisory](https://github.com/greenplum-db/gpdb/security/advisories?state=published) | ||
to the Greenplum Database community via GitHub. In most cases, additional | ||
communication via Slack, Twitter, mailing lists, blog and other channels will | ||
assist in educating Greenplum Database users and rolling out the patched | ||
release to affected users. | ||
|
||
The Greenplum project team will also publish any mitigating steps users can | ||
take until the fix can be applied to their Greenplum Database instances. | ||
|
||
## Mailing lists | ||
|
||
* Use security@greenplum.org to report security concerns to the Greenplum | ||
Database project team, who uses the list to privately discuss security issues | ||
and fixes prior to disclosure. | ||
|
||
## Confidentiality, integrity and availability | ||
|
||
We consider vulnerabilities leading to the compromise of data confidentiality, | ||
elevation of privilege, or integrity to be our highest priority concerns. | ||
Availability, in particular in areas relating to DoS and resource exhaustion, | ||
is also a serious security concern. The Greenplum Database project team takes | ||
all vulnerabilities, potential vulnerabilities, and suspected vulnerabilities | ||
seriously and will investigate them in an urgent and expeditious manner. | ||
|
||
Note that we do not currently consider the default settings for Greenplum | ||
Database to be secure-by-default. It is necessary for operators to explicitly | ||
configure settings, role based access control, and other resource related | ||
features in Greenplum Database to provide a hardened Greenplum Database | ||
environment. We will not act on any security disclosure that relates to a lack | ||
of safe defaults. Over time, we will work towards improved safe-by-default | ||
configuration, taking into account backwards compatibility. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1 +1 @@ | ||
2.0.1 | ||
2.1.0 |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.