Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.20.0 #76

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 12, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) 8.19.0 -> 8.20.0 age adoption passing confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) 8.19.0 -> 8.20.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v8.20.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin: [consistent-type-assertions] add arrayLiteralTypeAssertions options (#​10565)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-deprecated] add allow options (#​10585)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-misused-spread] add new rule (#​10551)
🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-condition] don't flag optional chaining for union types with an unconstrained type parameters (#​10602)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-shadow] ignore ordering of type declarations (#​10593)
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.19.1

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-type-assertion] handle literal types (#​10523)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-deprecated] doesn't report on shorthand property in an object expression (#​10550)
  • eslint-plugin: [strict-boolean-expressions] remove remaining (unsafe) autofixes (#​10548)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-shadow] report correctly on parameters of functions declared with the declare keyword (#​10543)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-base-to-string] check array generic type (#​10437)
❤️ Thank You
  • Kirk Waiblinger
  • mdm317
  • Ronen Amiel
  • Yukihiro Hasegawa @​y-hsgw

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v8.20.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.19.1

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "* 0-3 * * 1" in timezone Asia/Tokyo, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner January 12, 2025 16:30
@renovate renovate bot requested review from sankichi92 January 12, 2025 16:30
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.19.1 Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.20.0 Jan 13, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 2fe00e7 to a6f5a82 Compare January 14, 2025 23:08
@sankichi92 sankichi92 enabled auto-merge (squash) January 15, 2025 08:29
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from a6f5a82 to 2633daf Compare January 15, 2025 08:29
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 2633daf to 2527fd2 Compare January 15, 2025 08:31
@sankichi92 sankichi92 merged commit 4351c92 into main Jan 15, 2025
3 checks passed
@sankichi92 sankichi92 deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch January 15, 2025 08:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant