Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for setitem in inferencedata #2374

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024

Conversation

OriolAbril
Copy link
Member

@OriolAbril OriolAbril commented Aug 28, 2024

Description

Support idata[group] = dataset

Checklist

  • Follows official PR format
  • New features are properly documented (with an example if appropriate)?
  • Includes new or updated tests to cover the new feature
  • Code style correct (follows pylint and black guidelines)
  • Changes are listed in changelog

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://arviz--2374.org.readthedocs.build/en/2374/

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 29, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 86.98%. Comparing base (5a928fb) to head (0c42cd1).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
arviz/data/inference_data.py 80.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2374      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.99%   86.98%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         124      124              
  Lines       12862    12867       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits        11189    11193       +4     
- Misses       1673     1674       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@OriolAbril OriolAbril merged commit c94536b into arviz-devs:main Sep 11, 2024
13 checks passed
@OriolAbril OriolAbril deleted the setitem branch September 11, 2024 13:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants