Skip to content

Conversation

alexeagle
Copy link
Member

@alexeagle alexeagle commented Sep 25, 2025

Testing locally isn't working on MacOS arm64:

ERROR: /private/var/tmp/_bazel_alexeagle/ac5c25dfb9cf2a4fcbea5ab9eb6f568e/external/gawk/BUILD.bazel:52:11: Linking external/gawk/libsupport.a [for tool] failed: (Exit 1): llvm-ar failed: error executing CppArchive command (from target @@gawk//:support) external/llvm_toolchain/bin/llvm-ar @bazel-out/darwin_arm64-opt-exec-ST-a828a81199fe/bin/external/gawk/libsupport.a-2.params

Use --sandbox_debug to see verbose messages from the sandbox and retain the sandbox build root for debugging
external/llvm_toolchain/bin/llvm-ar: error: only one operation may be specified
OVERVIEW: LLVM Archiver

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 25, 2025

e2e/use_release folder: LCOV of commit 437ba48 during CI #1989

Summary coverage rate:
  lines......: 100.0% (2 of 2 lines)
  functions..: 100.0% (1 of 1 function)
  branches...: no data found

Files changed coverage rate: n/a

Co-authored-by: UebelAndre <github@uebelandre.com>
Copy link

aspect-workflows bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Test

7 test targets passed

Targets
//py/tests/py_image_layer:my_app_layers_test_test [k8-fastbuild]                          44ms
//py/tests/py_image_layer:py_image_test [k8-fastbuild]                                    4s
//py/tests/py_venv_image_layer:my_app_amd64_layers_test [k8-fastbuild]                    100ms
//py/tests/py_venv_image_layer:my_app_arm64_layers_test [k8-fastbuild]                    48ms
//py/tests/py_venv_image_layer:py_amd64_image_command_test [k8-fastbuild]                 6s
//py/tests/py_venv_image_layer:py_amd64_image_content_test [k8-fastbuild]                 269ms
//py/tests/py_venv_image_layer:py_arm64_image_content_test [k8-fastbuild]                 2s

Total test execution time was 12s. 38 tests (84.4%) were fully cached saving 1m 14s.

Copy link

@UebelAndre UebelAndre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will take a look at the build issue separately but the changes otherwise seem fine to me 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants