Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding support for Select in ScanEnhancedRequest #5451

Closed

Conversation

shetsa-amzn
Copy link
Contributor

Adding support for Select in ScanEnhancedRequest

Motivation and Context

#5382

Modifications

Adding support for Select Attribute in ScanEnhancedRequest

Testing

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
  • [x ] Local run of mvn install succeeds
  • My code follows the code style of this project
  • [] My change requires a change to the Javadoc documentation
  • I have updated the Javadoc documentation accordingly
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • All new and existing tests passed
  • I have added a changelog entry. Adding a new entry must be accomplished by running the scripts/new-change script and following the instructions. Commit the new file created by the script in .changes/next-release with your changes.
  • My change is to implement 1.11 parity feature and I have updated LaunchChangelog

License

  • I confirm that this pull request can be released under the Apache 2 license

@shetsa-amzn shetsa-amzn requested a review from a team as a code owner August 1, 2024 14:01
@shetsa-amzn shetsa-amzn marked this pull request as draft August 1, 2024 16:24
@shetsa-amzn shetsa-amzn marked this pull request as ready for review August 14, 2024 14:46
@shetsa-amzn shetsa-amzn deleted the shetsa-amzn/scan_enchanced_select branch August 27, 2024 21:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant