chore: Modified bug issue template to add checkbox to report potential regression.

[ashishdhingra]

Motivation and Context

Label potential-regression would make issue standout in the list and help engineers to handle high severity issues effectively.

Modifications

• Modified bug issue template to add checkbox to report potential regression.
• Added GitHub action to add/remove label potential-regression when issue is created/edited.

NOTE:

• The GitHub action code was ported from CDK repo.
• The label potential-regression would need to be created manually (we could use color #FF6700 and description Marking this issue as a potential regression to be checked by team member to make it consistent across SDK repos)

Testing

N/A

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Checklist

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
• Local run of mvn install succeeds
• My code follows the code style of this project
• My change requires a change to the Javadoc documentation
• I have updated the Javadoc documentation accordingly
• I have added tests to cover my changes
• All new and existing tests passed
• I have added a changelog entry. Adding a new entry must be accomplished by running the scripts/new-change script and following the instructions. Commit the new file created by the script in .changes/next-release with your changes.
• My change is to implement 1.11 parity feature and I have updated LaunchChangelog

License

• I confirm that this pull request can be released under the Apache 2 license

[debora-ito]

Can you add a check in the regression labeler to see if the repo is aws/aws-sdk-java-v2? This is to prevent the workflow from running in forks (ref: https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-java-v2/pull/5107/files)

[ashishdhingra]

Can you add a check in the regression labeler to see if the repo is aws/aws-sdk-java-v2? This is to prevent the workflow from running in forks (ref: https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-java-v2/pull/5107/files)

Done. Please review.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud