-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade error estimation for time-dependent problems #233
Conversation
Visualizations of the error indicator for the CPW example with lumped ports, at 60 GHz (to show the effect of multiple wavelengths):
We see that the correction for both energy terms (kinetic + potential, or magnetic + electric fields) makes the indicator more uniform over the length of the transmission line as we might expect, instead of preferentially indicating high errors at nodes of the electric field. |
a5aafac
to
bb5b6a0
Compare
bb5b6a0
to
436be1e
Compare
3c8924a
to
cd99f8f
Compare
04c9a40
to
8af134d
Compare
cd99f8f
to
fa82852
Compare
c7915cc
to
c358bbc
Compare
fa82852
to
432c369
Compare
8c7ea22
to
96fb17c
Compare
c4a2a64
to
dc0eb1b
Compare
… due to the field energy density calculation
dc0eb1b
to
9f76946
Compare
Consider both electric flux density and magnetic field recovery error for transient problems. Note: The improved recovery is incorrect for "infinitely thin" interior boundaries applying a PEC or impedance BC. In this case these BCs break the continuity of the recovered
H
andD
fields. This will be resolved in a future PR and is a separate improvement to the changes here.TODO
Note: Based on #237