Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Jan 4, 2026

Added detailed Chinese comments to Tokenizer.js and CSTBuilder.js to make the lexical analysis and CST construction logic accessible to developers unfamiliar with AST/CST concepts.

Changes

Tokenizer.js

  • Class-level documentation explaining tokenization and the Token concept with concrete examples
  • Method documentation for all parsing logic (strings, numbers, keywords, comments, punctuation)
  • Inline comments describing character-by-character parsing decisions

CSTBuilder.js

  • Class-level documentation clarifying CST vs AST differences and why CST preserves formatting
  • Method documentation explaining the recursive descent parsing strategy
  • Step-by-step inline comments for object and array parsing, including trivia handling

Documentation approach

Comments explain:

  • What each component does and why it exists
  • Key concepts (tokens, CST, trivia) with plain language definitions
  • Concrete examples of input/output transformations
  • Step-by-step breakdown of complex parsing logic

Example from Tokenizer:

/**
 * 读取数字
 * 
 * JSON 数字格式支持:
 * 1. 整数:123
 * 2. 负数:-123
 * 3. 小数:123.456
 * 4. 科学计数法:1.23e10 或 1.23E-5
 */
readNumber() {
  const start = this.pos;
  // 1. 处理可选的负号
  if (this.text[this.pos] === "-") this.pos++;
  // ...
}
Original prompt

请用中文注释,标注清楚 Tokenizer 和 CSTBuilder 的代码实现细节,让不了解 AST/CST 的开发者能够通熟易懂的阅读


✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

Co-authored-by: axetroy <9758711+axetroy@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Add Chinese comments for Tokenizer and CSTBuilder implementation Add comprehensive Chinese documentation to Tokenizer and CSTBuilder Jan 4, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from axetroy January 4, 2026 03:21
@axetroy axetroy marked this pull request as ready for review January 4, 2026 03:27
@axetroy axetroy merged commit 21dd10d into master Jan 4, 2026
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants