Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor/submitclaims claims #582

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 7, 2024
Merged

Refactor/submitclaims claims #582

merged 2 commits into from
Aug 7, 2024

Conversation

ccamel
Copy link
Member

@ccamel ccamel commented Jun 18, 2024

Addresses #580.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated documentation to reflect the new submit_claims.claims parameter for enhanced data integrity.
  • Refactor

    • Renamed the metadata field to claims in the SubmitClaims message structure for clarity and consistency.

@ccamel ccamel self-assigned this Jun 18, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes primarily involve renaming the metadata field to claims within the SubmitClaims struct and associated functions. This update aims to clarify the purpose and nature of the data, enhancing readability and reducing ambiguity in the codebase.

Changes

File Change Summary
contracts/axone-dataverse/src/contract.rs Renamed metadata to claims in SubmitClaims within the execute function.
contracts/axone-dataverse/src/execute.rs Updated submit_claims function signature to accept claims instead of data.
contracts/axone-dataverse/src/msg.rs Updated ExecuteMsg enum's SubmitClaims variant, replacing metadata with claims.
docs/axone-dataverse.md Updated the DataIntegrity section to reflect the renaming from metadata to claims.

Possibly related issues

Poem

In a realm of code so vast and grand,
We renamed fields with a gentle hand.
Metadata became claims, so clear and bright,
Making structures simple, pure delight.
Now every line speaks truth and grace,
A better contract in its place. 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ccamel ccamel force-pushed the refactor/submitclaims-claims branch from 83d4795 to ca69888 Compare June 18, 2024 13:04
@ccamel ccamel linked an issue Jun 18, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Files Coverage Δ
contracts/axone-dataverse/src/contract.rs 96.22% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
contracts/axone-dataverse/src/msg.rs 60.00% <ø> (ø)

@bot-anik
Copy link
Member

bot-anik commented Jun 18, 2024

size-limit report 📦

Path Size
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/axone_objectarium.wasm 458.07 KB (0%)
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/axone_law_stone.wasm 649.42 KB (0%)
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/axone_cognitarium.wasm 831.35 KB (0%)
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/axone_dataverse.wasm 670.4 KB (-0.01% 🔽)

@ccamel ccamel marked this pull request as ready for review June 18, 2024 13:14
@ccamel ccamel requested review from amimart and bdeneux June 18, 2024 13:14
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 922c757 and ca69888.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • contracts/axone-dataverse/src/contract.rs (8 hunks)
  • contracts/axone-dataverse/src/msg.rs (1 hunks)
  • docs/axone-dataverse.md (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Gitleaks
contracts/axone-dataverse/src/contract.rs

357-357: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)

LanguageTool
docs/axone-dataverse.md

[style] ~23-~23: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative. (EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH)
Context: ...gital Resources are identified by a URI in conjunction with the Service responsible for their provi...


[misspelling] ~29-~29: Use “an” instead of ‘a’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’. (EN_A_VS_AN)
Context: ...ould be an individual, organization, or a any kind of resource (dataset, algorith...


[style] ~37-~37: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym. (ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
Context: ... about a Resource identified by a DID. Claims play a pivotal role in the governance f...


[misspelling] ~147-~147: This word is normally spelled with a hyphen. (EN_COMPOUNDS_HUMAN_READABLE)
Context: ...address. | ## Definitions ### Addr A human readable address. In Cosmos, this is typically ...


[misspelling] ~149-~149: This word is normally spelled as one. (EN_COMPOUNDS_MULTI_CHAIN)
Context: ...is is typically bech32 encoded. But for multi-chain smart contracts no assumptions should b...


[uncategorized] ~149-~149: Possible missing comma found. (AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
Context: ...ch32 encoded. But for multi-chain smart contracts no assumptions should be made other tha...


[style] ~151-~151: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym. (ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
Context: ...dr = deps.api.addr_validate(input)?3. Uselet checked: Addr = deps.api.addr_huma...


[typographical] ~153-~153: Should there be a question mark at the end of this sentence? (MISSING_QUESTION_MARK2)
Context: ...)and operate on thatString` instance. | type | | ----------- | | **st...


[style] ~198-~198: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘very’, consider replacing this phrase. (EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)
Context: ...y. The limit is used to prevent storing very large triples, especially literals. Default t...


[style] ~212-~212: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘very’, consider replacing this phrase. (EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)
Context: ...y. The limit is used to prevent storing very large triples, especially literals. Default t...

Markdownlint
docs/axone-dataverse.md

7-7: null (MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
Multiple headings with the same content


227-227: null (MD025, single-title, single-h1)
Multiple top-level headings in the same document


109-109: Punctuation: ':' (MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)
Trailing punctuation in heading


52-52: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


53-53: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


101-101: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


102-102: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


115-115: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


116-116: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


130-130: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


140-140: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


141-141: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


191-191: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


192-192: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers

Additional comments not posted (2)
contracts/axone-dataverse/src/msg.rs (1)

59-62: The renaming of the field from metadata to claims in the SubmitClaims action is consistent with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summary. However, ensure that all references to this field in the codebase have been updated to reflect this change.

Verification successful

The renaming of the field from metadata to claims in the SubmitClaims action has been successfully applied across the codebase. No instances of the old metadata field were found.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all references to `SubmitClaims` use the new `claims` field.

# Test: Search for the old `metadata` field usage. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type rust $'SubmitClaims {.*metadata.*}'

Length of output: 170



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all references to `SubmitClaims` use the new `claims` field.

# Test: Search for the old `metadata` field usage. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type rust 'SubmitClaims \{.*metadata.*\}'

Length of output: 48

docs/axone-dataverse.md (1)

99-103: The documentation has been updated to reflect the renaming of metadata to claims in the SubmitClaims message. Ensure that this change is consistently applied across all documentation and help materials.

Tools
Markdownlint

101-101: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


102-102: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers

contracts/axone-dataverse/src/contract.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ccamel ccamel force-pushed the refactor/submitclaims-claims branch 2 times, most recently from 58b1266 to caac62b Compare June 18, 2024 13:35
Copy link
Contributor

@bdeneux bdeneux left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good 👍

Copy link
Member

@amimart amimart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I propose to finish all the security audit related fixed before merging this one, so we can make a proper release of the contracts with only security fixed before breaking changes the APIs, if that's ok :)

@ccamel ccamel marked this pull request as draft June 20, 2024 13:32
@ccamel ccamel force-pushed the refactor/submitclaims-claims branch from caac62b to fee04b5 Compare August 7, 2024 10:58
@ccamel ccamel marked this pull request as ready for review August 7, 2024 10:58
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ca69888 and fee04b5.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • contracts/axone-dataverse/src/contract.rs (9 hunks)
  • contracts/axone-dataverse/src/msg.rs (1 hunks)
  • docs/axone-dataverse.md (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Markdownlint
docs/axone-dataverse.md

101-101: null
Spaces inside emphasis markers

(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)


102-102: null
Spaces inside emphasis markers

(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)

Additional comments not posted (5)
contracts/axone-dataverse/src/msg.rs (1)

59-62: LGTM! The renaming improves clarity.

The metadata field has been renamed to claims, which enhances the semantic understanding of the code. The documentation comments have been updated accordingly.

contracts/axone-dataverse/src/contract.rs (3)

77-79: LGTM! The renaming improves clarity.

The metadata field has been renamed to claims, which enhances the semantic understanding of the code.


96-96: LGTM! The renaming improves clarity.

The parameter in the submit_claims function has been renamed from data to claims, which enhances the semantic understanding of the code.


98-98: LGTM! The logic remains unchanged.

The claims parameter is used to create a BufReader, which is then processed to read RDF quads and verify the Verifiable Credential. The renaming does not affect the functionality.

docs/axone-dataverse.md (1)

99-103: LGTM! The documentation updates enhance clarity.

The metadata parameter has been replaced with claims, and the description has been updated accordingly. This ensures that users understand the requirements for submitting claims in the dataverse context.

Tools
Markdownlint

101-101: null
Spaces inside emphasis markers

(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)


102-102: null
Spaces inside emphasis markers

(MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)

@ccamel
Copy link
Member Author

ccamel commented Aug 7, 2024

Alright. Now that version 6.0.0 has been released, including all the security fixes from the audit, we can proceed with merging this PR.

@ccamel ccamel merged commit 80cb9db into main Aug 7, 2024
17 checks passed
@ccamel ccamel deleted the refactor/submitclaims-claims branch August 7, 2024 11:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

♻️ Rename "metadata" field in SubmitClaims struct to "claims"
4 participants