Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(objectarium): make clearer description for pinning mechanism #588

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 24, 2024

Conversation

ccamel
Copy link
Member

@ccamel ccamel commented Jun 21, 2024

Addresses #551 by improving the description of pinning mechanisms and their potential consequences.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated descriptions for object pinning operations to clarify persistence and accessibility behavior in the user guide and API documentation.

@ccamel ccamel self-assigned this Jun 21, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 21, 2024

Walkthrough

In this update, the msg.rs file underwent refinements to enhance the documentation and descriptions for object pinning in the system. The changes focus on clarifying the behavior and implications of pinning objects regarding their persistence, accessibility, and conditions for removal. The accompanying documentation was updated to reflect these enhancements, ensuring a consistent and clear understanding for users and developers.

Changes

Files Change Summary
contracts/axone-objectarium/src/msg.rs Updated documentation comments for StoreObject, ForgetObject, PinObject, and UnpinObject in ExecuteMsg to clarify pinning behavior.
docs/axone-objectarium.md Refined explanations regarding object pinning, emphasizing persistence and removal conditions.

Poem

In the land of code where bytes do sing,
We pinned our objects with a mighty ring.
Now they persist, steady and clear,
Not disappearing, always near.
Unpin the bits when no longer dear,
And watch them vanish without fear.
A system refined, worthy to cheer!

🐰✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ccamel ccamel linked an issue Jun 21, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@bot-anik
Copy link
Member

size-limit report 📦

Path Size
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/axone_objectarium.wasm 400.67 KB (0%)
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/axone_law_stone.wasm 599.48 KB (0%)
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/axone_cognitarium.wasm 762.25 KB (0%)
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/axone_dataverse.wasm 622.17 KB (0%)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Files Coverage Δ
contracts/axone-objectarium/src/msg.rs 99.00% <ø> (ø)

@ccamel ccamel marked this pull request as ready for review June 21, 2024 17:40
@ccamel ccamel requested review from amimart and bdeneux June 21, 2024 17:40
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8e93919 and 2f54ef6.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • contracts/axone-objectarium/src/msg.rs (3 hunks)
  • docs/axone-objectarium.md (5 hunks)
Additional context used
Markdownlint
docs/axone-objectarium.md

301-301: null (MD034, no-bare-urls)
Bare URL used


148-148: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


175-175: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


177-177: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


178-178: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


186-186: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


187-187: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


195-195: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


196-196: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


204-204: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


205-205: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


217-217: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


225-225: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


226-226: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


234-234: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


245-245: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


246-246: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


254-254: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


257-257: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


267-267: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


270-270: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


275-275: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


276-276: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


279-279: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


290-290: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


291-291: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


292-292: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


293-293: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


294-294: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


295-295: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


313-313: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


314-314: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


324-324: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


325-325: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


369-369: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


370-370: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


371-371: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


425-425: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


426-426: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


427-427: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


428-428: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


429-429: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


430-430: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


438-438: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


439-439: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers

Additional comments not posted (10)
contracts/axone-objectarium/src/msg.rs (5)

38-42: Clarification on pinning mechanism added to the documentation.

The updated comments in the StoreObject enum provide a clearer explanation of the pinning mechanism's implications, which is crucial for users to understand the persistence and accessibility of stored objects. This change aligns with the PR's objective to enhance documentation clarity.


52-53: Enhanced description for the pin parameter.

The addition of a detailed description for the pin parameter in the StoreObject struct is a valuable update. It explicitly states the benefits of pinning, ensuring users are fully aware of the feature's functionality.


62-65: Updated comments for ForgetObject.

The comments for ForgetObject have been updated to provide a comprehensive explanation of the conditions under which an object is removed from storage. This update is crucial for understanding the operational mechanics of the ForgetObject function.


69-71: Reiteration of pinning behavior in PinObject.

The comments for PinObject effectively reiterate the non-operation condition if the object is already pinned, and the persistent protection provided by pinning. This consistency in documentation helps prevent operational errors by users.


75-77: Clear documentation for UnpinObject.

The comments for UnpinObject clearly outline the conditions under which an object can be unpinned and potentially removed from storage. This clarity is essential for users managing the lifecycle of stored objects.

docs/axone-objectarium.md (5)

169-169: Enhanced clarity in documentation regarding pinning.

The documentation now clearly explains the optional nature of pinning and its implications for object persistence and accessibility. This aligns with the PR's goal to clarify the pinning mechanism in the documentation.


178-178: Explicit pinning requirement stated in documentation.

The updated documentation mandates pinning for certain operations, ensuring that users understand the conditions under which objects remain persistent.

Tools
Markdownlint

178-178: null (MD037, no-space-in-emphasis)
Spaces inside emphasis markers


182-182: Detailed operational conditions for ForgetObject.

The documentation now includes detailed conditions under which an object can be forgotten, which is crucial for users to manage object lifecycle effectively.


191-191: Clarification on pinning behavior in PinObject.

The documentation for PinObject clearly states the no-operation condition if the object is already pinned, which helps in avoiding redundant operations.


200-200: Detailed behavior of UnpinObject documented.

The updated documentation for UnpinObject outlines the precise behavior when an object is not pinned, enhancing user understanding of object management.

Copy link
Member

@amimart amimart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Copy link
Contributor

@bdeneux bdeneux left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@ccamel ccamel merged commit 796db8f into main Jun 24, 2024
17 checks passed
@amimart amimart deleted the docs/pin-description-improvement branch August 12, 2024 09:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

🛡️ Unauthorized Object Deletion Triggers Denial of Service
4 participants