Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

merge upstream develop #29

Merged
merged 104 commits into from
Sep 9, 2024
Merged

merge upstream develop #29

merged 104 commits into from
Sep 9, 2024

Conversation

bwbohl
Copy link
Member

@bwbohl bwbohl commented Aug 29, 2024

No description provided.

dependabot bot and others added 30 commits June 17, 2024 07:32
Bumps [actions/checkout](https://github.com/actions/checkout) from 4.1.6 to 4.1.7.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/checkout/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/actions/checkout/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](actions/checkout@a5ac7e5...692973e)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: actions/checkout
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
…/checkout-4.1.7

Bump actions/checkout from 4.1.6 to 4.1.7
Before this commit, Edirom Online assumed that an annotation would only be shown if it matched both category and priority filters; this was a problem for editions that would not use, e.g., priorities at all. Consequently, the priorities filter would be empty, and the annotation would always return false for that filter.
After this commit, there is a value 'undefined' for visibleCategorie and visibleAnnotations, and the filter corresponding result for an annotation will be set to true if the corresponding visibleCategorie or visiblePriorities is 'undefined',
Merge pull request #390 from Edirom/fix/getAnnotationOverlay
bwbohl and others added 29 commits August 15, 2024 11:38
Signed-off-by: Benjamin W. Bohl <b.w.bohl@gmail.com>
this commit introduces a PR template.

Refs #406
The former content of this file (styleguide content) was moved to its own file STYLE-GUIDE.md with PR #404. Contribution guidelines were set up now.

Refs #227
information regarding how to test the code before starting a pull request was added, the description was taken from the README.md. 

Refs #408
thanks @riedde for reviewing. i like your updates :)

Co-authored-by: Dennis Ried <dennis.ried@uni-paderborn.de>
this commit adds a lot of information to this file, eg mission statement and project examples.
the small description part how to test was moved to CONTRIBUTING, since the whole description of contribution is living in this file. 
the paragraph "Starting an Edirom instance locally" was written by @daniel-jettka, thanks to this great improvement to help others to get their edirom started with this guidance!
... images will be added quite soon

Refs #399
this commit adds 3 screenshots to support getting an impression of the described showcases
this commit reacts to a review remark by @peterstadler by translating a work to english and delete some links that are already included in the introduction ti improve the reading flow.
thanks for improving the text with your review, Peter :)

Refs #399
thanks @peterstadler for your review. i accept all of your ideas!

Co-authored-by: Peter Stadler <stadlerpeter@yahoo.fr>
Co-authored-by: Peter Stadler <stadlerpeter@yahoo.fr>
thanks for your patience!

Co-authored-by: Peter Stadler <stadlerpeter@yahoo.fr>
[ftr] Set up CONTRIBUTING.md

Thank you.
Bumps [actions/upload-artifact](https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact) from 4.3.4 to 4.4.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact/releases)
- [Commits](actions/upload-artifact@0b2256b...5076954)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: actions/upload-artifact
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Salome and I were testing the current build artifact and realized that the TEI Stylesheets were missing in the EOL xar which caused the Edirom to fail miserably. 
Introducing `submodules: 'recursive'` will hopefully fix this – or is there any reason to exclude the submodules from the build here?
checkout repository recursively in Github action
…erialize-options-with-output-options

replace proprietary `exist:serialize` options
…/upload-artifact-4.4.0

Bump actions/upload-artifact from 4.3.4 to 4.4.0
@bwbohl bwbohl merged commit 52a8c2f into baz-ga:develop Sep 9, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants