CI: rules_docker failing on macOS #4173

laszlocsomor · 2017-11-27T14:10:57Z

bazel-nightly's downstream project "rules_docker " is failing:

https://ci.bazel.io/job/Global/job/rules_docker/294/consoleFull

[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] FAILED: Build did NOT complete successfully (75 packages loaded)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] FAILED: Build did NOT complete successfully (75 packages loaded)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] java.lang.RuntimeException: Unrecoverable error while evaluating node 'CONFIGURED_TARGET://testdata:java_bin_as_lib_image e4509483ce5a4ed4ff6e50c5e4b8b8b6 (1167560220 1611918777)' (requested by nodes )
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.skyframe.AbstractParallelEvaluator$Evaluate.run(AbstractParallelEvaluator.java:414)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.concurrent.AbstractQueueVisitor$WrappedRunnable.run(AbstractQueueVisitor.java:352)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid EvalException:
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] java.lang.NullPointerException
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.rules.java.JavaInfo.getTransitiveRuntimeJars(JavaInfo.java:213)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.callMethod(FuncallExpression.java:297)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.DotExpression.eval(DotExpression.java:115)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.DotExpression.doEval(DotExpression.java:54)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Expression.eval(Expression.java:67)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.evalArguments(FuncallExpression.java:686)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.callFunction(FuncallExpression.java:746)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.doEval(FuncallExpression.java:719)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Expression.eval(Expression.java:67)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.LValue.assignAugmented(LValue.java:177)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execAugmentedAssignment(Eval.java:57)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execDispatch(Eval.java:185)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.exec(Eval.java:173)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execStatements(Eval.java:221)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execIfBranch(Eval.java:62)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execDispatch(Eval.java:188)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.exec(Eval.java:173)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execIf(Eval.java:119)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execDispatch(Eval.java:204)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.exec(Eval.java:173)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.UserDefinedFunction.call(UserDefinedFunction.java:88)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.BaseFunction.call(BaseFunction.java:430)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.callFunction(FuncallExpression.java:747)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.doEval(FuncallExpression.java:719)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Expression.eval(Expression.java:67)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.LValue.assignAugmented(LValue.java:177)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execAugmentedAssignment(Eval.java:57)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execDispatch(Eval.java:185)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.exec(Eval.java:173)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.UserDefinedFunction.call(UserDefinedFunction.java:88)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.BaseFunction.call(BaseFunction.java:430)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.skylark.SkylarkRuleConfiguredTargetUtil.buildRule(SkylarkRuleConfiguredTargetUtil.java:92)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.ConfiguredTargetFactory.createRule(ConfiguredTargetFactory.java:347)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.ConfiguredTargetFactory.createConfiguredTarget(ConfiguredTargetFactory.java:233)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.skyframe.SkyframeBuildView.createConfiguredTarget(SkyframeBuildView.java:500)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.skyframe.ConfiguredTargetFunction.createConfiguredTarget(ConfiguredTargetFunction.java:589)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.skyframe.ConfiguredTargetFunction.compute(ConfiguredTargetFunction.java:245)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.skyframe.AbstractParallelEvaluator$Evaluate.run(AbstractParallelEvaluator.java:340)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.concurrent.AbstractQueueVisitor$WrappedRunnable.run(AbstractQueueVisitor.java:352)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.EvalException.<init>(EvalException.java:112)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.EvalException$EvalExceptionWithJavaCause.<init>(EvalException.java:209)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.EvalException$EvalExceptionWithJavaCause.<init>(EvalException.java:217)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.callMethod(FuncallExpression.java:330)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.DotExpression.eval(DotExpression.java:115)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.DotExpression.doEval(DotExpression.java:54)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Expression.eval(Expression.java:67)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.evalArguments(FuncallExpression.java:686)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.callFunction(FuncallExpression.java:746)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.doEval(FuncallExpression.java:719)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Expression.eval(Expression.java:67)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.LValue.assignAugmented(LValue.java:177)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execAugmentedAssignment(Eval.java:57)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execDispatch(Eval.java:185)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.exec(Eval.java:173)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execStatements(Eval.java:221)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execIfBranch(Eval.java:62)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execDispatch(Eval.java:188)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.exec(Eval.java:173)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execIf(Eval.java:119)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execDispatch(Eval.java:204)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.exec(Eval.java:173)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.UserDefinedFunction.call(UserDefinedFunction.java:88)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.BaseFunction.call(BaseFunction.java:430)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.callFunction(FuncallExpression.java:747)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.doEval(FuncallExpression.java:719)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Expression.eval(Expression.java:67)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.LValue.assignAugmented(LValue.java:177)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execAugmentedAssignment(Eval.java:57)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execDispatch(Eval.java:185)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.exec(Eval.java:173)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.UserDefinedFunction.call(UserDefinedFunction.java:88)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.BaseFunction.call(BaseFunction.java:430)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.skylark.SkylarkRuleConfiguredTargetUtil.buildRule(SkylarkRuleConfiguredTargetUtil.java:92)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.ConfiguredTargetFactory.createRule(ConfiguredTargetFactory.java:347)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.ConfiguredTargetFactory.createConfiguredTarget(ConfiguredTargetFactory.java:233)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.skyframe.SkyframeBuildView.createConfiguredTarget(SkyframeBuildView.java:500)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.skyframe.ConfiguredTargetFunction.createConfiguredTarget(ConfiguredTargetFunction.java:589)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.skyframe.ConfiguredTargetFunction.compute(ConfiguredTargetFunction.java:245)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.skyframe.AbstractParallelEvaluator$Evaluate.run(AbstractParallelEvaluator.java:340)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	... 4 more
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] java.lang.RuntimeException: Unrecoverable error while evaluating node 'CONFIGURED_TARGET://testdata:java_bin_as_lib_image e4509483ce5a4ed4ff6e50c5e4b8b8b6 (1167560220 1611918777)' (requested by nodes )
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.skyframe.AbstractParallelEvaluator$Evaluate.run(AbstractParallelEvaluator.java:414)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.concurrent.AbstractQueueVisitor$WrappedRunnable.run(AbstractQueueVisitor.java:352)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid EvalException:
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] java.lang.NullPointerException
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.rules.java.JavaInfo.getTransitiveRuntimeJars(JavaInfo.java:213)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.callMethod(FuncallExpression.java:297)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.DotExpression.eval(DotExpression.java:115)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.DotExpression.doEval(DotExpression.java:54)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Expression.eval(Expression.java:67)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.evalArguments(FuncallExpression.java:686)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.callFunction(FuncallExpression.java:746)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.doEval(FuncallExpression.java:719)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Expression.eval(Expression.java:67)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.LValue.assignAugmented(LValue.java:177)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execAugmentedAssignment(Eval.java:57)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execDispatch(Eval.java:185)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.exec(Eval.java:173)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execStatements(Eval.java:221)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execIfBranch(Eval.java:62)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execDispatch(Eval.java:188)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.exec(Eval.java:173)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execIf(Eval.java:119)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execDispatch(Eval.java:204)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.exec(Eval.java:173)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.UserDefinedFunction.call(UserDefinedFunction.java:88)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.BaseFunction.call(BaseFunction.java:430)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.callFunction(FuncallExpression.java:747)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.doEval(FuncallExpression.java:719)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Expression.eval(Expression.java:67)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.LValue.assignAugmented(LValue.java:177)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execAugmentedAssignment(Eval.java:57)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execDispatch(Eval.java:185)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.exec(Eval.java:173)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.UserDefinedFunction.call(UserDefinedFunction.java:88)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.BaseFunction.call(BaseFunction.java:430)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.skylark.SkylarkRuleConfiguredTargetUtil.buildRule(SkylarkRuleConfiguredTargetUtil.java:92)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.ConfiguredTargetFactory.createRule(ConfiguredTargetFactory.java:347)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.ConfiguredTargetFactory.createConfiguredTarget(ConfiguredTargetFactory.java:233)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.skyframe.SkyframeBuildView.createConfiguredTarget(SkyframeBuildView.java:500)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.skyframe.ConfiguredTargetFunction.createConfiguredTarget(ConfiguredTargetFunction.java:589)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.skyframe.ConfiguredTargetFunction.compute(ConfiguredTargetFunction.java:245)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.skyframe.AbstractParallelEvaluator$Evaluate.run(AbstractParallelEvaluator.java:340)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.concurrent.AbstractQueueVisitor$WrappedRunnable.run(AbstractQueueVisitor.java:352)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.EvalException.<init>(EvalException.java:112)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.EvalException$EvalExceptionWithJavaCause.<init>(EvalException.java:209)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.EvalException$EvalExceptionWithJavaCause.<init>(EvalException.java:217)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.callMethod(FuncallExpression.java:330)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.DotExpression.eval(DotExpression.java:115)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.DotExpression.doEval(DotExpression.java:54)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Expression.eval(Expression.java:67)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.evalArguments(FuncallExpression.java:686)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.callFunction(FuncallExpression.java:746)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.doEval(FuncallExpression.java:719)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Expression.eval(Expression.java:67)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.LValue.assignAugmented(LValue.java:177)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execAugmentedAssignment(Eval.java:57)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execDispatch(Eval.java:185)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.exec(Eval.java:173)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execStatements(Eval.java:221)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execIfBranch(Eval.java:62)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execDispatch(Eval.java:188)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.exec(Eval.java:173)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execIf(Eval.java:119)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execDispatch(Eval.java:204)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.exec(Eval.java:173)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.UserDefinedFunction.call(UserDefinedFunction.java:88)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.BaseFunction.call(BaseFunction.java:430)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.callFunction(FuncallExpression.java:747)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.FuncallExpression.doEval(FuncallExpression.java:719)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Expression.eval(Expression.java:67)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.LValue.assignAugmented(LValue.java:177)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execAugmentedAssignment(Eval.java:57)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.execDispatch(Eval.java:185)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.Eval.exec(Eval.java:173)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.UserDefinedFunction.call(UserDefinedFunction.java:88)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.syntax.BaseFunction.call(BaseFunction.java:430)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.skylark.SkylarkRuleConfiguredTargetUtil.buildRule(SkylarkRuleConfiguredTargetUtil.java:92)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.ConfiguredTargetFactory.createRule(ConfiguredTargetFactory.java:347)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.analysis.ConfiguredTargetFactory.createConfiguredTarget(ConfiguredTargetFactory.java:233)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.skyframe.SkyframeBuildView.createConfiguredTarget(SkyframeBuildView.java:500)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.skyframe.ConfiguredTargetFunction.createConfiguredTarget(ConfiguredTargetFunction.java:589)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.lib.skyframe.ConfiguredTargetFunction.compute(ConfiguredTargetFunction.java:245)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	at com.google.devtools.build.skyframe.AbstractParallelEvaluator$Evaluate.run(AbstractParallelEvaluator.java:340)
[variation=,node=darwin-x86_64] 	... 4 more

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

mattmoor · 2017-11-28T23:14:56Z

What's going on with this?

laszlocsomor · 2017-11-29T08:44:50Z

@mattmoor : Do you need more information? I was going to assign this bug to someone who maintains https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_docker but I see you are one. :)

Capstan · 2017-11-29T13:24:20Z

I don't think this is rules_docker's fault. It was caused in-between commits to that repo, and coincided with the most recent release of bazel. If I go back to 0.7.0, it doesn't break the same way.

Capstan · 2017-11-29T13:27:48Z

This is also not MacOS-specific.

Capstan · 2017-11-29T22:23:52Z

Moreover I think this was one of the cherrypicks into 0.8, since I had put a travis build of a early testing release of 0.8-rc2 and it didn't have the same problem (bazelbuild/rules_docker#214 (comment))

Capstan · 2017-11-29T22:31:28Z

https://travis-ci.org/bazelbuild/rules_docker/builds/299556420 is the run against the then-testing 0.8.0 release plus my changes that succeeded.

mattmoor · 2017-11-29T23:07:58Z

@laszlocsomor As @Capstan indicates, this is almost certainly a Bazel 0.8 bug.

If there is a workaround in rules_docker, I'm happy to apply it, but I don't even know where to begin parsing that monstrous stack trace.

@damienmg FYI

davido · 2017-11-30T06:57:36Z

@mattmoor As always, try to create a minimal reproducer fot this problem.

damienmg · 2017-11-30T07:09:03Z

@dslomov: Can you investigate and cherrypick a fix in 0.8.1? I saw the failure on the release candidate: https://ci.bazel.io/view/Bazel%20bootstrap%20and%20maintenance/job/bazel/job/release/328/Downstream_projects/

dslomov · 2017-11-30T16:00:57Z

The problematic commit in Bazel is this 7c605cf, which is old but only got released in 0.8.0. I suspect something happened is rules_docker or their dependencies to trigger this. Assigning to @iirina for triage: can we make a fix that can be cherry-picked to 0.8.0?

dslomov · 2017-11-30T16:07:26Z

the commit where this started to fail in rules_docker is bazelbuild/rules_docker@2bfd21e

dslomov · 2017-11-30T16:08:43Z

repro is:

git clone git@github.com:bazelbuild/rules_docker.git
cd rules_docker
bazel build //...

mattmoor · 2017-11-30T16:09:55Z

(shameless plug) @iirina is the reviewer on the Groovy version of this PR, which needs love too :)

mattmoor · 2017-11-30T21:19:45Z

Ugh, CI for rules_docker is just dead. How do we avoid this in the future? Are there Bazel CI legs that can be added to test against HEAD?

What's the timeline on a fix? I'm guessing not the 0.9 RC since that cuts tomorrow... :(

dslomov · 2017-11-30T21:52:32Z

We will block cutting 0.9 RC on fixing this.

damienmg · 2017-12-01T06:40:24Z

Ftr we should do a patch release. Also we do test with head and we have the breakage on ci too.

…

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017, 10:52 PM Dmitry Lomov ***@***.***> wrote: We will block cutting 0.9 RC on fixing this. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4173 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADjHf5fLbx4PGOTxCN3bFaqxi7B6Vw9mks5s7yOmgaJpZM4QrsPF> .

dslomov · 2017-12-01T08:17:42Z

#4196 (see above) tracks a potential patch release.

damienmg · 2017-12-01T08:35:47Z

Thanks!

…

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 9:17 AM Dmitry Lomov ***@***.***> wrote: #4196 <#4196> (see above) tracks a potential patch release. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4173 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADjHf0MQ34-l2WXSSaTOr9C8IhnvqYjsks5s77YrgaJpZM4QrsPF> .

iirina · 2017-12-01T10:12:23Z

Hi,

I'm working on a fix. I tried to reproduce the issue with my custom bazel but ran into another error:

ERROR: /home/elenairina/testnpe/rules_docker/testdata/BUILD:131:1: ImageLayer testdata/base_with_entrypoint-layer.tar failed (Exit 1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/elenairina/.cache/bazel/_bazel_elenairina/0c66a61696353126ad55bd3793c13ec8/bazel-sandbox/6324190021707892768/execroot/io_bazel_rules_docker/bazel-out/host/bin/container/build_tar.runfiles/io_bazel_rules_docker/container/build_tar.py", line 23, in <module>
    from third_party.py import gflags
  File "/home/elenairina/.cache/bazel/_bazel_elenairina/0c66a61696353126ad55bd3793c13ec8/bazel-sandbox/6324190021707892768/execroot/io_bazel_rules_docker/bazel-out/host/bin/container/build_tar.runfiles/bazel_tools/third_party/py/gflags/__init__.py", line 1, in <module>
    from gflags import *
  File "/home/elenairina/.cache/bazel/_bazel_elenairina/0c66a61696353126ad55bd3793c13ec8/bazel-sandbox/6324190021707892768/execroot/io_bazel_rules_docker/bazel-out/host/bin/container/build_tar.runfiles/bazel_tools/third_party/py/gflags/gflags/__init__.py", line 871, in <module>
    _helpers.SPECIAL_FLAGS)
  File "/home/elenairina/.cache/bazel/_bazel_elenairina/0c66a61696353126ad55bd3793c13ec8/bazel-sandbox/6324190021707892768/execroot/io_bazel_rules_docker/bazel-out/host/bin/container/build_tar.runfiles/bazel_tools/third_party/py/gflags/gflags/__init__.py", line 560, in DEFINE_string
    DEFINE(parser, name, default, help, flag_values, serializer, **args)
  File "/home/elenairina/.cache/bazel/_bazel_elenairina/0c66a61696353126ad55bd3793c13ec8/bazel-sandbox/6324190021707892768/execroot/io_bazel_rules_docker/bazel-out/host/bin/container/build_tar.runfiles/bazel_tools/third_party/py/gflags/gflags/__init__.py", line 392, in DEFINE
    flag_values, module_name)
  File "/home/elenairina/.cache/bazel/_bazel_elenairina/0c66a61696353126ad55bd3793c13ec8/bazel-sandbox/6324190021707892768/execroot/io_bazel_rules_docker/bazel-out/host/bin/container/build_tar.runfiles/bazel_tools/third_party/py/gflags/gflags/__init__.py", line 413, in DEFINE_flag
    fv[flag.name] = flag
  File "/home/elenairina/.cache/bazel/_bazel_elenairina/0c66a61696353126ad55bd3793c13ec8/bazel-sandbox/6324190021707892768/execroot/io_bazel_rules_docker/bazel-out/host/bin/container/build_tar.runfiles/bazel_tools/third_party/py/gflags/gflags/flagvalues.py", line 442, in __setitem__
    raise exceptions.DuplicateFlagError.from_flag(name, self)
gflags.exceptions.DuplicateFlagError: The flag 'flagfile' is defined twice. First from third_party.py.gflags.gflags, Second from third_party.py.gflags.  Description from first occurrence: Insert flag definitions from the given file into the command line.

Any thoughts how I can test that I fixed this with rules_docker?

Capstan · 2017-12-01T10:40:31Z

Hm. That looks like gflags/python-gflags#9, but like gflags self-hosed. Given this is pulling from bazel_tools (i.e., the bazel you've built), perhaps there's another issue recently introduced? (e.g., 8fd0f4a)

Capstan · 2017-12-01T10:41:43Z

Or rather fb15f0f#diff-3189aae2901c56b0748876200a1d7a3c

iirina · 2017-12-01T13:24:08Z

@Capstan thanks! I reverted fb15f0f locally before I built bazel and I managed to build rules_docker succesfully! Fix will land anytime now.

Capstan · 2017-12-01T13:34:06Z

Is there something tracking the gflags weirdness yet? (is it known outside of the rules_docker issue?)

iirina · 2017-12-01T13:35:07Z

Not that I know of. I will open a new bug about it now.

Fixes #4173. RELNOTES: None. PiperOrigin-RevId: 177582228

mattmoor · 2017-12-01T14:58:27Z

thanks for getting this resolved!

Fixes #4173. RELNOTES: None. PiperOrigin-RevId: 177582228

This was referenced Nov 28, 2017

travis CI is broken with bazel 0.8.0 bazelbuild/rules_docker#247

Closed

Release - November 2017 - Target RC date: 2017-11-06 - name: 0.8.0 #3772

Closed

damienmg assigned dslomov Nov 30, 2017

damienmg added breakage P1 I'll work on this now. (Assignee required) Release blocker type: bug labels Nov 30, 2017

damienmg mentioned this issue Nov 30, 2017

Release - December 2017 - Target RC date: 2017-12-01 - name: 0.9.0 #3773

Closed

dslomov mentioned this issue Nov 30, 2017

Patch release 0.8.1 #4196

Closed

dslomov assigned iirina and dslomov and unassigned dslomov Nov 30, 2017

iirina mentioned this issue Dec 1, 2017

rules_docker fails to build with bazel @ HEAD #4206

Closed

bazel-io closed this as completed in 49008a3 Dec 1, 2017

dslomov pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 1, 2017

Avoid NPEs when providers are not found in JavaInfo.

74ea92e

Fixes #4173. RELNOTES: None. PiperOrigin-RevId: 177582228

dslomov pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 4, 2017

Avoid NPEs when providers are not found in JavaInfo.

a385ad4

Fixes #4173. RELNOTES: None. PiperOrigin-RevId: 177582228

dslomov pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 4, 2017

Avoid NPEs when providers are not found in JavaInfo.

6f67cb1

Fixes #4173. RELNOTES: None. PiperOrigin-RevId: 177582228

hwright mentioned this issue Dec 4, 2017

Update for python 3 compatibility bazelbuild/rules_docker#255

Merged

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

CI: rules_docker failing on macOS #4173

CI: rules_docker failing on macOS #4173

laszlocsomor commented Nov 27, 2017

mattmoor commented Nov 28, 2017

laszlocsomor commented Nov 29, 2017

Capstan commented Nov 29, 2017

Capstan commented Nov 29, 2017

Capstan commented Nov 29, 2017

Capstan commented Nov 29, 2017

mattmoor commented Nov 29, 2017

davido commented Nov 30, 2017

damienmg commented Nov 30, 2017

dslomov commented Nov 30, 2017

dslomov commented Nov 30, 2017

dslomov commented Nov 30, 2017

mattmoor commented Nov 30, 2017

mattmoor commented Nov 30, 2017

dslomov commented Nov 30, 2017

damienmg commented Dec 1, 2017 via email

dslomov commented Dec 1, 2017

damienmg commented Dec 1, 2017 via email

iirina commented Dec 1, 2017

Capstan commented Dec 1, 2017

Capstan commented Dec 1, 2017

iirina commented Dec 1, 2017

Capstan commented Dec 1, 2017

iirina commented Dec 1, 2017

mattmoor commented Dec 1, 2017

CI: rules_docker failing on macOS #4173

CI: rules_docker failing on macOS #4173

Comments

laszlocsomor commented Nov 27, 2017

mattmoor commented Nov 28, 2017

laszlocsomor commented Nov 29, 2017

Capstan commented Nov 29, 2017

Capstan commented Nov 29, 2017

Capstan commented Nov 29, 2017

Capstan commented Nov 29, 2017

mattmoor commented Nov 29, 2017

davido commented Nov 30, 2017

damienmg commented Nov 30, 2017

dslomov commented Nov 30, 2017

dslomov commented Nov 30, 2017

dslomov commented Nov 30, 2017

mattmoor commented Nov 30, 2017

mattmoor commented Nov 30, 2017

dslomov commented Nov 30, 2017

damienmg commented Dec 1, 2017 via email

dslomov commented Dec 1, 2017

damienmg commented Dec 1, 2017 via email

iirina commented Dec 1, 2017

Capstan commented Dec 1, 2017

Capstan commented Dec 1, 2017

iirina commented Dec 1, 2017

Capstan commented Dec 1, 2017

iirina commented Dec 1, 2017

mattmoor commented Dec 1, 2017