Skip to content

Conversation

@limdor
Copy link
Contributor

@limdor limdor commented Dec 2, 2025

This is required to implement #517

For details see #525

@limdor
Copy link
Contributor Author

limdor commented Jan 14, 2026

@trybka @armandomontanez @pzembrod @c-mita @hvadehra could some of you provide some initial feedback? Do you think this is something that could happen or do we need to find another alternative?
Thanks!

@armandomontanez
Copy link
Collaborator

The only one I'm not confident about exposing is ToolchainConfigInfo. I suspect that one will churn slightly over time as an implementation detail. The remaining providers are straightforward enough that I don't foresee significant breaking changes.

I'm generally onboard with this idea because of the work it will unlock--it was one of my original goals to expose these after we were confident this ruleset had stabilized.

@limdor
Copy link
Contributor Author

limdor commented Jan 17, 2026

I will close the PR then, I will find another way to expose only the necessary symbols.

@limdor limdor closed this Jan 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants