Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create All.yml #69

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 28, 2025
Merged

Create All.yml #69

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 28, 2025

Conversation

bearycool11
Copy link
Owner

@bearycool11 bearycool11 commented Jan 28, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Workflow Configuration
    • Added comprehensive GitHub Actions workflow for pull request management
    • Implemented automated jobs for first interactions, reviewer assignments, code reviews, and merging
    • Integrated CodeRabbit AI for code analysis and testing
    • Established notification mechanisms for workflow completion

Signed-off-by: J. K. Edwards <joed6834@colorado.edu>
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 28, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a comprehensive GitHub Actions workflow configuration in .workflow/All.yml. The workflow manages various stages of pull request interactions, including first interactions, reviewer assignments, review submissions, and merging. It establishes a structured automation process with multiple jobs that handle different events like pull request opening, review submission, and merging, while also incorporating CodeRabbit AI code analysis and team notifications.

Changes

File Change Summary
.workflow/All.yml Added comprehensive workflow configuration with multiple jobs:
- First interaction handling
- Step assignment tracking
- Review submission management
- Merge process tracking
- CodeRabbit AI code analysis
- Team notification system

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

documentation, enhancement

Poem

🐰 Workflow magic, lines of code so bright,
Automation dancing with GitHub's might,
Reviewers assigned, steps tracked with care,
CodeRabbit AI watching everywhere,
Pull requests flowing, smooth and light! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.workflow/All.yml (1)

3-12: Consider adding more event triggers for comprehensive coverage.

The workflow could benefit from additional triggers such as:

  • pull_request_target for handling fork PRs securely
  • issue_comment for handling PR comments
  • pull_request_review_comment for handling review comments
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8d96ac4 and 15e2859.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .workflow/All.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.workflow/All.yml

[error] 176-176: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 177-177: syntax error: expected , but found ''

(syntax)


[error] 181-181: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 187-187: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 189-189: duplication of key "name" in mapping

(key-duplicates)


[error] 196-196: duplication of key "on" in mapping

(key-duplicates)


[error] 203-203: duplication of key "permissions" in mapping

(key-duplicates)


[error] 208-208: duplication of key "jobs" in mapping

(key-duplicates)


[error] 253-253: duplication of key "name" in mapping

(key-duplicates)


[error] 260-260: duplication of key "on" in mapping

(key-duplicates)


[error] 268-268: duplication of key "permissions" in mapping

(key-duplicates)


[error] 273-273: duplication of key "jobs" in mapping

(key-duplicates)


[warning] 367-367: too many blank lines

(3 > 2) (empty-lines)


[warning] 384-384: too many blank lines

(3 > 2) (empty-lines)


[warning] 390-390: too many blank lines

(3 > 2) (empty-lines)


[warning] 408-408: too many blank lines

(3 > 2) (empty-lines)


[warning] 420-420: too many blank lines

(3 > 2) (empty-lines)


[warning] 448-448: too many blank lines

(3 > 2) (empty-lines)


[warning] 456-456: too many blank lines

(3 > 2) (empty-lines)


[warning] 482-482: too many blank lines

(3 > 2) (empty-lines)


[warning] 498-498: too many blank lines

(3 > 2) (empty-lines)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Summary

Comment on lines +177 to +521

# Get the current step to only run the main job when the learner is on the same step.

get_current_step:

name: Check current step number

runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps:

- name: Checkout

uses: actions/checkout@v4

- id: get_step

run: |

echo "current_step=$(cat ./.github/steps/-step.txt)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT

outputs:

current_step: ${{ steps.get_step.outputs.current_step }}



on_open_a_pull_request:

name: On open a pull request

needs: get_current_step



# We will only run this action when:

# 1. This repository isn't the template repository.

# 2. The step is currently 1.

# 3. The head branch name is `update-game`.

# Reference: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/contexts

# Reference: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/learn-github-actions/expressions

if: >-

${{ !github.event.repository.is_template

&& needs.get_current_step.outputs.current_step == 1

&& github.head_ref == 'update-game' }}

# We'll run Ubuntu for performance instead of Mac or Windows.

runs-on: ubuntu-latest



steps:

# We'll need to check out the repository so that we can edit the README.

- name: Checkout

uses: actions/checkout@v4

with:

fetch-depth: 0 # Let's get all the branches.

ref: update-game # Important, as normally `pull_request` event won't grab other branches.



# In README.md, switch step 1 for step 2.

- name: Update to step 2

uses: skills/action-update-step@v2

with:

token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

from_step: 1

to_step: 2

branch_name: update-game
Footer

© 2025 GitHub, Inc.
Footer navigation
Terms
Privacy
Security
name: Step 3, Leave a review
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Split the workflow into separate files to fix YAML syntax issues.

The current file structure has several critical issues:

  1. Multiple workflow definitions in a single file
  2. Duplicate keys (name, on, permissions, jobs)
  3. Invalid YAML syntax

This violates GitHub Actions best practices and will cause workflow failures.

Move each workflow definition to a separate file in the .github/workflows directory:

  1. first-interaction.yml
  2. assign-reviewer.yml
  3. review-submission.yml
  4. merge.yml
  5. coderabbit.yml
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 177-177: syntax error: expected , but found ''

(syntax)


[error] 181-181: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 187-187: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 189-189: duplication of key "name" in mapping

(key-duplicates)


[error] 196-196: duplication of key "on" in mapping

(key-duplicates)


[error] 203-203: duplication of key "permissions" in mapping

(key-duplicates)


[error] 208-208: duplication of key "jobs" in mapping

(key-duplicates)


[error] 253-253: duplication of key "name" in mapping

(key-duplicates)


[error] 260-260: duplication of key "on" in mapping

(key-duplicates)


[error] 268-268: duplication of key "permissions" in mapping

(key-duplicates)


[error] 273-273: duplication of key "jobs" in mapping

(key-duplicates)


[warning] 367-367: too many blank lines

(3 > 2) (empty-lines)


[warning] 384-384: too many blank lines

(3 > 2) (empty-lines)


[warning] 390-390: too many blank lines

(3 > 2) (empty-lines)


[warning] 408-408: too many blank lines

(3 > 2) (empty-lines)


[warning] 420-420: too many blank lines

(3 > 2) (empty-lines)


[warning] 448-448: too many blank lines

(3 > 2) (empty-lines)


[warning] 456-456: too many blank lines

(3 > 2) (empty-lines)


[warning] 482-482: too many blank lines

(3 > 2) (empty-lines)


[warning] 498-498: too many blank lines

(3 > 2) (empty-lines)

Comment on lines +14 to +16
permissions:
contents: write
pull-requests: write
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance workflow security.

Consider these security improvements:

  1. Limit permissions to the minimum required for each job
  2. Add permissions: read-all as default and explicitly grant write permissions only where needed
  3. Consider using environment protection rules for sensitive operations

Apply this diff to improve security:

 permissions:
-  contents: write
-  pull-requests: write
+  contents: read
+  pull-requests: read
+
+jobs:
+  first_interaction_job:
+    permissions:
+      pull-requests: write

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines +135 to +167
# CodeRabbitAI Workflow Job
run-coderabbit-ai:
name: Code Review with CodeRabbitAI
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: github.event_name == 'push' || github.event_name == 'pull_request' || github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch'
steps:
- name: Checkout Code
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Setup Node.js
uses: actions/setup-node@v3
with:
node-version: "18.x"
- name: Install CodeRabbit AI CLI
run: npm install -g coderabbit-cli
- name: Run CodeRabbit Analysis
run: |
coderabbit analyze \
--branch ${{ github.head_ref || github.ref_name }} \
--output report.json \
--token ${{ secrets.CODERABBIT_API_TOKEN }}
- name: Annotate Pull Request with Results
run: |
coderabbit upload \
--branch ${{ github.head_ref || github.ref_name }} \
--token ${{ secrets.CODERABBIT_API_TOKEN }}
- name: Run Tests
if: always()
run: npm test
- name: Complete Workflow
run: echo "CodeRabbit AI analysis completed."

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling and optimize the CodeRabbit AI job.

  1. Add error handling for CLI installation
  2. Add caching for npm dependencies
  3. Check if package.json exists before running tests

Apply this diff to improve the job:

  run-coderabbit-ai:
    name: Code Review with CodeRabbitAI
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    if: github.event_name == 'push' || github.event_name == 'pull_request' || github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch'
    steps:
      - name: Checkout Code
        uses: actions/checkout@v4
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0
      - name: Setup Node.js
        uses: actions/setup-node@v3
        with:
          node-version: "18.x"
+     - name: Cache npm dependencies
+       uses: actions/cache@v3
+       with:
+         path: ~/.npm
+         key: npm-${{ hashFiles('package.json') }}
+         restore-keys: npm-
      - name: Install CodeRabbit AI CLI
+       continue-on-error: true
+       id: install-cli
        run: npm install -g coderabbit-cli
+     - name: Check CLI Installation
+       if: steps.install-cli.outcome == 'failure'
+       run: |
+         echo "Failed to install CodeRabbit AI CLI"
+         exit 1
      - name: Run CodeRabbit Analysis
        run: |
          coderabbit analyze \
            --branch ${{ github.head_ref || github.ref_name }} \
            --output report.json \
            --token ${{ secrets.CODERABBIT_API_TOKEN }}
      - name: Annotate Pull Request with Results
        run: |
          coderabbit upload \
            --branch ${{ github.head_ref || github.ref_name }} \
            --token ${{ secrets.CODERABBIT_API_TOKEN }}
      - name: Run Tests
        if: always()
+       run: |
+         if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
+           npm test
+         else
+           echo "No package.json found, skipping tests"
+         fi
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
# CodeRabbitAI Workflow Job
run-coderabbit-ai:
name: Code Review with CodeRabbitAI
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: github.event_name == 'push' || github.event_name == 'pull_request' || github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch'
steps:
- name: Checkout Code
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Setup Node.js
uses: actions/setup-node@v3
with:
node-version: "18.x"
- name: Install CodeRabbit AI CLI
run: npm install -g coderabbit-cli
- name: Run CodeRabbit Analysis
run: |
coderabbit analyze \
--branch ${{ github.head_ref || github.ref_name }} \
--output report.json \
--token ${{ secrets.CODERABBIT_API_TOKEN }}
- name: Annotate Pull Request with Results
run: |
coderabbit upload \
--branch ${{ github.head_ref || github.ref_name }} \
--token ${{ secrets.CODERABBIT_API_TOKEN }}
- name: Run Tests
if: always()
run: npm test
- name: Complete Workflow
run: echo "CodeRabbit AI analysis completed."
# CodeRabbitAI Workflow Job
run-coderabbit-ai:
name: Code Review with CodeRabbitAI
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: github.event_name == 'push' || github.event_name == 'pull_request' || github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch'
steps:
- name: Checkout Code
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Setup Node.js
uses: actions/setup-node@v3
with:
node-version: "18.x"
- name: Cache npm dependencies
uses: actions/cache@v3
with:
path: ~/.npm
key: npm-${{ hashFiles('package.json') }}
restore-keys: npm-
- name: Install CodeRabbit AI CLI
continue-on-error: true
id: install-cli
run: npm install -g coderabbit-cli
- name: Check CLI Installation
if: steps.install-cli.outcome == 'failure'
run: |
echo "Failed to install CodeRabbit AI CLI"
exit 1
- name: Run CodeRabbit Analysis
run: |
coderabbit analyze \
--branch ${{ github.head_ref || github.ref_name }} \
--output report.json \
--token ${{ secrets.CODERABBIT_API_TOKEN }}
- name: Annotate Pull Request with Results
run: |
coderabbit upload \
--branch ${{ github.head_ref || github.ref_name }} \
--token ${{ secrets.CODERABBIT_API_TOKEN }}
- name: Run Tests
if: always()
run: |
if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
npm test
else
echo "No package.json found, skipping tests"
fi
- name: Complete Workflow
run: echo "CodeRabbit AI analysis completed."

@bearycool11 bearycool11 merged commit 2439a3b into main Jan 28, 2025
1 of 14 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant