Skip to content

Conversation

@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

Resolves #295. @jpdna I'll test this and let you know if this winds up being much of an accuracy change. Thanks for catching this! Also, this needs some more tests to catch the bad behavior.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 19, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 79.929% when pulling c0ab9ff on fnothaft:issues/295-fix-qual-index into e0979dd on bigdatagenomics:master.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/avocado-prb/231/
Test PASSed.

@fnothaft fnothaft added this to the 0.2.0 milestone Jun 9, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants