Skip to content

Explore
By company size
By use case
By industry
View all solutions
Topics
- AI
- DevOps
- Security
- Software Development
- View all
Explore
- GitHub Sponsors
  Fund open source developers
- The ReadME Project
  GitHub community articles
Repositories
- Enterprise platform
  AI-powered developer platform
Available add-ons
Pricing

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Search

Clear

Search syntax tips

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Include my email address so I can be contacted

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Name

Query

To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.

Sign in

Sign up

You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.

Dismiss alert

bitcoin-core / secp256k1 Public

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings
Fork 1k
Star 2.1k

Code
Issues 96
Pull requests 53
Discussions
Actions
Projects
Security
Insights

Additional navigation options

Code
Issues
Pull requests
Discussions
Actions
Projects
Security
Insights

CI

cmake: Improve handling of `SECP256K1_APPEND_*FLAGS` options #646

Sign in to view logs

Sign in to view logs

cmake: Improve handling of `SECP256K1_APPEND_*FLAGS` options

cmake: Improve handling of `SECP256K1_APPEND_*FLAGS` options #646

Summary
Jobs
Run details
- Usage
- Workflow file

Usage Workflow file

x64 (MSVC): Windows (VS 2022, int128_struct with __(u)mulh)

succeeded Dec 17, 2024 in 5m 6s

Loading

Re-running jobs...

You can’t perform that action at this time.

cmake: Improve handling of SECP256K1_APPEND_*FLAGS options #646

x64 (MSVC): Windows (VS 2022, int128_struct with __(u)mulh)

x64 (MSVC): Windows (VS 2022, int128_struct with __(u)mulh)

Re-running jobs...

cmake: Improve handling of `SECP256K1_APPEND_*FLAGS` options #646