Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
no dash
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Co-authored-by: Jon Atack <jon@atack.com>
  • Loading branch information
psztorc and jonatack authored Sep 23, 2024
1 parent 90b67cb commit f886644
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion bip-0301.mediawiki
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ However, traditional MM has two drawbacks:

We use notation side:\* and main:\* in front of otherwise ambiguous words (such as "block", "node", or "chain"), to distinguish the mainchain version from its sidechain/alt-chain counterpart. We name all sidechain users "Simon", and name all mainchain miners "Mary".

Furthermore, here is an example of BIP-301 in use. Imagine that a side:block contains 20,000 txns, each paying a $0.10 fee; therefore, the side:block is worth $2000 of fee revenue. In BIP-301, the sidechain's coinbase txn will pay this $2000 to "Simon". Simon does no hashing, but instead makes one L1 txn paying $1999 to the L1 miners ("Mary"). Thus, Mary ends up with all of the fee-revenue, even though she didn't do anything on the sidechain.
Furthermore, here is an example of BIP-301 in use. Imagine that a side:block contains 20,000 txns, each paying a $0.10 fee; therefore, the side:block is worth $2000 of fee revenue. In BIP-301, the sidechain's coinbase txn will pay this $2000 to "Simon". Simon does no hashing, but instead makes one L1 txn paying $1999 to the L1 miners ("Mary"). Thus, Mary ends up with all of the fee revenue, even though she didn't do anything on the sidechain.


{| class="wikitable"
Expand Down

0 comments on commit f886644

Please sign in to comment.