Add bip-txrelayv2

[ariard]

If we find a better way to implement reject unrequested transactions in a backward compatible fashion, I’ll withdraw it.

ML post: https://groups.google.com/g/bitcoindev/c/nWUcXBQbLGU
Bitcoin Core conceptual discussion: bitcoin/bitcoin#30572

Re-opening there is tx-relay work-in-progress available here: https://bitcoinbackbone.org/.

Open comments on #1663 have been fixed.

[ariard]

By the way I have a question about the BIPs, and not sure where to ask.

I’m on re-implementing BIP324 in backbone and in my humble opinion there are some sections that could be more well-defined or clarified not only in pseudo-code (e.g around FSChaCha20Poly1305 and FSChaCha20), i.e adding precise typing, use more strict cryptographic vocabulary sometimes, etc.

When I have a list of erratas and suggestions ready to submit, what should be the process, like I’m opening a pull request for review ? There are not technical changes per se, more clarifying the vocabulary for re-implementators and ease the work there. cc @jonatack @murchandamus

[jonatack]

When I have a list of erratas and suggestions ready to submit, what should be the process, like I’m opening a pull request for review ?

Hi @ariard, yes, open a pull request to this repository.