Skip to content

Conversation

mandreko-bitwarden
Copy link
Contributor

🎟️ Tracking

https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/VULN-285

📔 Objective

Perform cleanup of existing workflows to be in compliance with Zizmor and bwwl.

⏰ Reminders before review

  • Contributor guidelines followed
  • All formatters and local linters executed and passed
  • Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
  • Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
  • Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
  • CI builds passed
  • Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
  • Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

  • 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
  • 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
  • ❓ (:question:) for questions
  • 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
  • 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
  • ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
  • 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
  • ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

@mandreko-bitwarden mandreko-bitwarden requested a review from a team as a code owner October 1, 2025 13:40
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2025

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details0ccf67b1-8b02-4006-89b7-3fde7cc65f13

Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request

run: echo "{\"flagValues\":$_FEATURE_FLAGS}" > "flags.json"

- name: Download extension artifact
uses: dawidd6/action-download-artifact@09f2f74827fd3a8607589e5ad7f9398816f540fe # v3.1.4
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a pretty large version jump - why was this not handled via Renovate automation?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not entirely sure on that one. I would speculate due to how the author changed the versioning to only major version, but I would think that'd be detected as well.. We'll have to watch it

Copy link
Contributor

@jprusik jprusik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One non-blocking question about the large version bump for dawidd6/action-download-artifact - otherwise seems good and BIT passes.

After merge we'll want to keep an eye on the PR commenting steps as clients repository dispatch events come in to make sure they still work, but I don't imagine there will be any issues, given these changes.

@mandreko-bitwarden mandreko-bitwarden merged commit 331370a into main Oct 6, 2025
7 checks passed
@mandreko-bitwarden mandreko-bitwarden deleted the vuln-285 branch October 6, 2025 18:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants