Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix generic ssrf tests #2256

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Feb 13, 2025
Merged

Fix generic ssrf tests #2256

merged 18 commits into from
Feb 13, 2025

Conversation

liquidsec
Copy link
Collaborator

@liquidsec liquidsec commented Feb 6, 2025

No description provided.

@liquidsec liquidsec marked this pull request as draft February 6, 2025 16:13
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.33333% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 93%. Comparing base (dd546f6) to head (b1e8d11).
Report is 45 commits behind head on dev.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
bbot/test/conftest.py 87% 3 Missing ⚠️
...st_step_2/module_tests/test_module_generic_ssrf.py 96% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##             dev   #2256   +/-   ##
=====================================
- Coverage     93%     93%   -0%     
=====================================
  Files        378     378           
  Lines      29363   29409   +46     
=====================================
+ Hits       27156   27197   +41     
- Misses      2207    2212    +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@liquidsec
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Also implementing #2230

@liquidsec
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Seems to be JUST parrot security now, and its always fails with 29 out of 30 events.....

@liquidsec
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pain

@liquidsec liquidsec merged commit bd2e659 into dev Feb 13, 2025
14 checks passed
@liquidsec liquidsec deleted the generic-ssrf-rework branch February 13, 2025 14:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants