fix: Cropped Module Permissions #979
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ssionView by a lot - fixed cropped and unreachable permissions if a certain amount of permissions are requested - might need adjusting if at some point more permissions are added
dlamkins
approved these changes
Sep 12, 2024
|
Thank you! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Decreases the vertical padding between permissions in the
ModulePermissionViewby a lot.Discussed and disregarded alternatives
ModulePermissionViewmainFlowPanelDiscussion Reference
All new features must be discussed prior to code review. This is to ensure that the implementation aligns with other design considerations. Please link to the Discord discussion:
https://discord.com/channels/531175899588984842/536970543736291346/1283174876751986719
Is this a breaking change?
Breaking changes require additional review prior to merging. If you answer yes, please explain what breaking changes have been made.
No