Fixed the issues discussed in the meeting #435
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request encompasses several frontend modifications across different components and utility files. The changes primarily focus on improving text handling in CSS, adjusting dashboard metric naming, streamlining progress steps, and enhancing code snippet functionality. The updates include CSS property additions for better text wrapping, metric name corrections, removal of a page from the onboarding process, and implementing a clipboard copy feature for code snippets. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Labels
Suggested Reviewers
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
frontend/src/scenes/progressSteps/ProgressStepsMain.jsx (1)
206-210: Potential for a unified navigation function
Knees might be weak, but the code is sturdy. Consider merging the increment and decrement logic into one function with direction parameters for slightly cleaner code.frontend/src/scenes/settings/CodeTab/CodeTab.jsx (1)
80-94: Dynamic code snippet
Great job injecting the server URL into your snippet. This blocks any stage-fright when your snippet goes live. Double-check to ensure the final script source is correct, so you don’t choke at the last second.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
frontend/src/products/Hint/HintComponent.css(1 hunks)frontend/src/products/Popup/PopupComponent.module.css(2 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/dashboard/Dashboard.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/progressSteps/ProgressSteps/ProgressSteps.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/progressSteps/ProgressStepsMain.jsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/scenes/settings/CodeTab/CodeTab.jsx(2 hunks)frontend/src/utils/constants.js(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- frontend/src/scenes/progressSteps/ProgressSteps/ProgressSteps.jsx
🔇 Additional comments (12)
frontend/src/scenes/progressSteps/ProgressStepsMain.jsx (2)
200-204: New increment logic is spot on
No vomit on the sweater here—this logic handles the upper boundary nicely. Great job at referencing pages.length to avoid stepping out of bounds.
215-215: Verify that step count matches the intended content
Before you serve mom’s spaghetti, double-check that stepData aligns with the pages array length and that your content array uses consistent indexing if one page is removed.
frontend/src/utils/constants.js (2)
3-3: Local environment now in play
This switch to the local URL stands tall like a champion. Just ensure that all references to the staging URL have gracefully bowed out in the codebase. Knees weak, arms spaghetti – but it’s solid.
6-6: Staging URL comment-out
The staging URL is now on the bench! Confirm no external references are still expecting the old domain. Sweat the details so we don’t lose ourselves in the moment.
[approve]
frontend/src/scenes/dashboard/Dashboard.jsx (3)
16-26: Metric naming symphony
Renaming these to “Popup views,” “Hint views,” etc., clarifies usage. No more spaghetti confusion! Strong alignment with the changed status for each guide type.
[approve]
37-37: Only the chosen ones
Specifically filtering for ‘popup,’ ‘banner,’ and ‘link’ is crisp and targeted. Just ensure these are the only metric types you want to display, or else 8 Mile might become 9.
43-43: Filtering logic
The new filter approach is easy to read and aligns well with the rest of your code. Keep your eyes sharp to confirm that other metrics remain intentionally excluded.
[approve]
frontend/src/scenes/settings/CodeTab/CodeTab.jsx (3)
96-104: Clipboard copy function
The handleCopy function is short and sweet. Next time you drop the mic with a copy feature, keep an eye out for legacy browsers that may not fully support navigator.clipboard.
128-135: Iconic copy
Attaching the copy function to the icon is neat. This encourages more user engagement than a plain text link. Make sure the spaghetti doesn’t slip away.
[approve]
138-138: Displayed code snippet
Rendering the snippet in <pre><code>... ensures it’s visually clear. If it’s a real whopper of text, consider adding some code highlight or scroll.
[approve]
frontend/src/products/Hint/HintComponent.css (1)
42-45: Break-word game
Adding word-wrap and overflow-wrap is a subtle improvement that cuts down on horizontal scrolling. Users can focus on the real progress, not fiddling with overflow.
[approve]
frontend/src/products/Popup/PopupComponent.module.css (1)
13-14: Yo, these text-wrapping properties are straight fire! 🔥
The addition of both word-wrap and overflow-wrap properties is a solid approach for handling text overflow across different browsers. This should effectively fix the overflow issues mentioned in the PR objectives.
Let's make sure we've got all our bases covered with this script:
✅ Verification successful
Yo dawg, these text-wrapping styles are consistent across the codebase! 🍝
Just dropped some mad beats through the codebase and found we're keeping it real with the same text overflow handling in other components too! The word-wrap and overflow-wrap combo appears in:
- HintComponent.css (both properties)
- Toast.module.scss (using
word-wrap)
This consistency is exactly what we want, fam! Your changes to PopupComponent are following the established pattern, especially matching the style in HintComponent. That's some clean code harmony right there!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if we're consistently handling text overflow across components
rg -g '*.css' -g '*.scss' 'word-wrap:|overflow-wrap:'
Length of output: 508
PopupPreviewandHintPreview