Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add info on the fraud proof changes #279

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 3 additions & 5 deletions docs/docs/learn/bob-stack/op-stack.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
---
sidebar_position: 3
sidebar_label: 'Phase 1: Optimistic BOB'
sidebar_label: "Phase 1: Optimistic BOB"
---

# Phase 1: Optimistic BOB
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -55,8 +55,6 @@ Instead of changing the execution client, necessary features including proving B

### Settlement

The OP Stack settles on Ethereum. Currently, the OP Stack is lacking fraud proofs which is a major downside of using OP Stack as users cannot prove fraudulent behavior by the sequencer.
The OP Stack settles on Ethereum. Initially, the OP Stack lacked fraud proofs which was a major downside of using OP Stack as users could not prove fraudulent behavior by the sequencer. On July 10th 2024, the OP-stack used by the BOB chain switched to a full fraud-proof enabled implementation, thus ensuring honest sequencer operation. For further information, please refer to the [OP stack documentation](https://docs.optimism.io/builders/notices/fp-changes).

However, OP Stack has a [candidate for fraud proofs in testing](https://blog.oplabs.co/open-source-and-feature-complete-fault-proofs-bring-permissionless-validation-to-the-op-sepolia-testnet/) and is actively working on increasing the efficiency of fraud proofs using ZK.

We are working towards an approach to add merged mining security to the rollup by making a PoW part of state transition. Consequently, a lack of PoW constitutes a fault by the sequencer. Thereby, Bitcoin miners validate the rollup to offset the trust in the sequencer (in both the centralized and decentralized sequencer case).
We are working towards an approach to [add merged mining security to the rollup](./merged-mining.md) by making a PoW part of state transition. Consequently, a lack of PoW constitutes a fault by the sequencer. Thereby, Bitcoin miners validate the rollup to offset the trust in the sequencer (in both the centralized and decentralized sequencer case).