Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[HACKATHON] feat(evm): add initial contracts to intent settlement and validation #344

Draft
wants to merge 16 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

[HACKATHON] feat(evm): add initial contracts to intent settlement and validation #344

wants to merge 16 commits into from

Conversation

topocount
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@changeset-bot changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 19, 2024 •
edited
Loading

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: ae17070

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions github-actions bot added the EVM label Dec 19, 2024
@sammccord
Copy link
Contributor

Fails
🚫 Please add some non-placeholder details to the PR description.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against ce7e1dd

@topocount topocount force-pushed the art/feature/intentional-intent-hacking-hacker branch from 9ab943b to b0b59a1 Compare December 19, 2024 15:55
@topocount topocount force-pushed the art/feature/intentional-intent-hacking-hacker branch from b0b59a1 to bd002d1 Compare December 19, 2024 15:56
@sammccord
Copy link
Contributor

Fails
🚫 Please add some non-placeholder details to the PR description.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against bd002d1

2 similar comments
@sammccord
Copy link
Contributor

Fails
🚫 Please add some non-placeholder details to the PR description.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against bd002d1

@sammccord
Copy link
Contributor

Fails
🚫 Please add some non-placeholder details to the PR description.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against bd002d1

@sammccord
Copy link
Contributor

Fails
🚫 Please add some non-placeholder details to the PR description.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 751ac1a

@topocount
chore(evm): deploy relevant intent artifacts
c0e7607 
We are deploying the DestinationSettler and the IntentValidator. The
existing OriginSettler on Odyssey will suffice for our purposes.
@sammccord
Copy link
Contributor

Fails
🚫 Please add some non-placeholder details to the PR description.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against c0e7607

@sammccord
Copy link
Contributor

Fails
🚫 Please add some non-placeholder details to the PR description.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against d69e07e

@topocount
chore(evm): deploy relevant intent artifacts
8f35fbb 
We are deploying the DestinationSettler and the IntentValidator. The
existing OriginSettler on Odyssey will suffice for our purposes.
@topocount
fix(evm): make imports consistent so wagmi builds
ad829bf
@sammccord
Copy link
Contributor

Fails
🚫 Please add some non-placeholder details to the PR description.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against ad829bf

@sammccord
Copy link
Contributor

Fails
🚫 Please add some non-placeholder details to the PR description.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against fa03efd

@sammccord
Copy link
Contributor

Fails
🚫 Please add some non-placeholder details to the PR description.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 7f9b7e8

@sammccord
Copy link
Contributor

Fails
🚫 Please add some non-placeholder details to the PR description.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against ae17070

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
EVM
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@topocount @sammccord @Quazia