Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: cardinality of restriction not as intended. #216

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2023

Conversation

CBenghi
Copy link
Contributor

@CBenghi CBenghi commented Oct 31, 2023

Fix: maxOccurs of restriction within idsValue
The value has been limited to 1, this was a mistake in the schema
definition, it was alsways interpreted as 1 by the implementers.

The value has been limited to 1, this was a mistake in the schema
definition, it was alsways interpreted as 1 by the implementers.
@CBenghi
Copy link
Contributor Author

CBenghi commented Oct 31, 2023

This is related to #204

@CBenghi CBenghi linked an issue Oct 31, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@CBenghi CBenghi changed the title Issues/204 Fix: cardinality of restriction not as intended. Oct 31, 2023
@CBenghi CBenghi changed the base branch from master to development October 31, 2023 10:12
@CBenghi
Copy link
Contributor Author

CBenghi commented Oct 31, 2023

This was accepted in the call today.

@pasi-paasiala pasi-paasiala merged commit 92664f6 into buildingSMART:development Oct 31, 2023
1 check failed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Correct cardinality for restriction
2 participants