20260115 applyWithType SVE implement

[sugar-little-bit]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #127

Type of Change

• 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• 🚀 Performance improvement (optimization)
• ⚠️ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• 🔨 Refactoring (no logic changes)
• 🔧 Build/CI or Infrastructure changes
• 📝 Documentation only

Description

Added SVE vectorized implement for bytedance::bolt::functions::sparksql::hash::applyWithType

Performance Impact

• No Impact: This change does not affect the critical path (e.g., build system, doc, error handling).

• Positive Impact: I have run benchmarks.

  Click to view Benchmark Results

  Compared to before the optimization, there is an overall improvement of 2.5% in tpcds 1T database.
  

• Negative Impact: Explained below (e.g., trade-off for correctness).

Release Note

Please describe the changes in this PR

Release Note:

Release Note:
- Added SVE vectorized implement for bytedance::bolt::functions::sparksql::hash::applyWithType.

Checklist (For Author)

• I have added/updated unit tests (ctest).
• I have verified the code with local build (Release/Debug).
• I have run clang-format / linters.
• (Optional) I have run Sanitizers (ASAN/TSAN) locally for complex C++ changes.
• No need to test or manual test.

Breaking Changes

• No

• Yes (Description: ...)

  Click to view Breaking Changes

  Breaking Changes:
  - Description of the breaking change.
  - Possible solutions or workarounds.
  - Any other relevant information.
  

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.

---

liangruifeng (A) seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[yangzhg]

Is this file exist on x86 machines?

[sugar-little-bit]

No, the arm_sve.h header file does not exist on standard x86 machines, as it is specific to the ARM architecture. I will modify the code to be compatible with both arm64 and x86 architectures.

If the current architecture is x86, then follow the original logic.