Feat：Add SVE (Scalable Vector Extension) support for SimdUtil-inl.h

[KAlbert2333]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #54

Type of Change

• 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• 🚀 Performance improvement (optimization)
• ⚠️ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• 🔨 Refactoring (no logic changes)
• 🔧 Build/CI or Infrastructure changes
• 📝 Documentation only

Description

Constructed the xsimd extension of SVE and implemented SVE optimization for some Simd functions.

Performance Impact

• No Impact: This change does not affect the critical path (e.g., build system, doc, error handling).

• Positive Impact: I have run benchmarks.

  Click to view Benchmark Results

  TPCDS99 1T results.
  Before: 1565s
  After: 1530s  (+2%)
  

• Negative Impact: Explained below (e.g., trade-off for correctness).

Release Note

Please describe the changes in this PR

Release Note:

Release Note:
- Constructed an xsimd extension for SVE and provided vectorized implementations of functions such as BitMask, Gather, MaskGather, Pack32, Permute, Filter, etc

Checklist (For Author)

• I have added/updated unit tests (ctest).
• I have verified the code with local build (Release/Debug).
• I have run clang-format / linters.
• (Optional) I have run Sanitizers (ASAN/TSAN) locally for complex C++ changes.
• No need to test or manual test.

Breaking Changes

• No

• Yes (Description: ...)

  Click to view Breaking Changes

  Breaking Changes:
  - Description of the breaking change.
  - Possible solutions or workarounds.
  - Any other relevant information.
  

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[fzhedu]

can you add some tests about the simd code? besides, it is better to report the performance gain by comparing to the scalar code

[kexianda]

It won't work on the old ARM platform which only support Neon?
Is any compiler flag to detect this? The specified preprocessor macro SVE_BITS does not work on all the hardware platforms

[KAlbert2333]

It won't work on the old ARM platform which only support Neon? Is any compiler flag to detect this? The specified preprocessor macro SVE_BITS does not work on all the hardware platforms

Added 'lscpu' to determine if the current CPU supports the 'sve' instruction set

[KAlbert2333]

can you add some tests about the simd code? besides, it is better to report the performance gain by comparing to the scalar code

We will provide reports on scalar and vector differences soon