Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adição de validador agência bancária #301

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 25, 2024

Conversation

tnas
Copy link
Contributor

@tnas tnas commented Oct 16, 2024

O validador de agência bancária foi implementado seguindo o algoritmo disponível em
https://www.cadcobol.com.br/cobol_dv_verifica_banco_do_brasil.htm

Para testar o cômputo de dígito verificador, a seguinte tabela de agências do banco do brasil pode ser útil:
https://www.bb.com.br/docs/portal/digov/RelacaoAgContaDtAbertura.pdf

@tnas
Copy link
Contributor Author

tnas commented Oct 16, 2024

Opa @angeliski,
Aqui a outra metade do PR original, agora contemplando apenas o novo validador de agência bancária

@angeliski
Copy link
Member

Salve mestre @tnas , você pode atualizar com a master? Atualizamos a versão do Java e ativamos o GH Actions

@tnas
Copy link
Contributor Author

tnas commented Oct 18, 2024

Opa @angeliski , atualizada com a master

@angeliski
Copy link
Member

Curioso que ele não ativou o CI 🤔

Vou pegar os testes pra rodar local e faço o Merge depois

@tnas
Copy link
Contributor Author

tnas commented Oct 23, 2024

Estranho mesmo. Localmente, os testes do stella-core rodaram 100%

Copy link
Member

@angeliski angeliski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Show de bola, os testes passaram :)
image

@angeliski angeliski merged commit c11de0e into caelum:master Oct 25, 2024
1 check passed
@tnas tnas deleted the validador-agencia-bancaria branch November 5, 2024 19:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants