Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DPE-4861] Add test to ensure correct k8s endpoints created for clusters with the same name #508

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2024

Conversation

shayancanonical
Copy link
Contributor

Issue

We are missing an integration test for #501

Solution

Add integration test

Copy link
Contributor

@paulomach paulomach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😍


@pytest.mark.group(1)
@pytest.mark.abort_on_fail
async def test_labeling_of_k8s_endpoints(ops_test: OpsTest):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the one thing to dispute here is the test being under ha tests, but I guess it's due usage of helpers, and not about being ha. we may need to shuffle some of the helpers for organization sake

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

agreed, let's rearrange furniture in a separate PR allowing a better classification of integration tests

Copy link
Contributor

@taurus-forever taurus-forever left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@shayancanonical shayancanonical merged commit 61db833 into main Sep 19, 2024
97 of 99 checks passed
@shayancanonical shayancanonical deleted the feature/endpoint_selector_test branch September 19, 2024 11:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants