Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: updated documents Committee ExpertGroup ReleaseManagement #116

Conversation

MaximilianHauer
Copy link

  • removed spelling errors
  • small adjustments regarding wording
  • added a new section for responsibilities & roles

* removed spelling errors
* small adjustments regarding wording
* added a new section for responsibilities & roles
Copy link
Contributor

@Grand-Thibault Grand-Thibault left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please change the structure in the Expert Group Member section


Each Expert Group is required to elect both a Lead and a Co-Lead. These roles serve as the primary points of contact for all inquiries and requests directed towards the Committee.
#### Election and Contact Points
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please dont use 4. level headings. Instead use - xyz or think about a new page

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

using markdownlint for this and it recommended this structure. didnt we align on this addon ?

The Lead roles are designed to be "first among equals," responsible for maintaining cohesion and coordination within the Expert Group.
They ensure that all efforts align with the Committee's objectives and facilitate efficient progress towards achieving them.

### Expert Group Members
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All points are valid but I think it is too long. Descriptions in the working model should be short. Also I hope that some of the responsibilities (joining meetings etc.) should be expected. Otherwise I would put them higher up in the page hierachy as they apply also for other association bodies.

Copy link
Author

@MaximilianHauer MaximilianHauer Sep 16, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i thought this structures provides an easy readability but we could also condense it like this

"The Leads serve as the primary points of contact, ensuring the effective delivery of the product strategy by the Expert Group. They have the authority to delegate tasks and create additional roles as needed. The Leads are also responsible for monitoring member participation, escalating issues with underperforming members, and maintaining cohesion and coordination within the Expert Group to align with the Committee's objectives"

@MaximilianHauer MaximilianHauer closed this by deleting the head repository Sep 17, 2024
@MaximilianHauer
Copy link
Author

learned that i create the PR on the wrong repo
new one is here https://github.com/catenax-eV/cx-working-model/pull/66

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants