feat!: sync with mainline ABCI

README.md

@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
 
 celestia-core is a fork of [cometbft/cometbft](https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft), an implementation of the Tendermint protocol, with the following changes:
 
-1. Early adoption of the ABCI++ methods: `PrepareProposal` and `ProcessProposal` because they haven't yet landed in a CometBFT release.
-1. Modifications to how `DataHash` in the block header is determined. In CometBFT, `DataHash` is based on the transactions included in a block. In Celestia, block data (including transactions) are erasure coded into a data square to enable data availability sampling. In order for the header to contain a commitment to this data square, `DataHash` was modified to be the Merkle root of the row and column roots of the erasure coded data square. See [ADR 008](https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-core/blob/v0.34.x-celestia/docs/celestia-architecture/adr-008-updating-to-tendermint-v0.35.x.md?plain=1#L20) for the motivation or [celestia-app/pkg/da/data_availability_header.go](https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-app/blob/2f89956b22c4c3cfdec19b3b8601095af6f69804/pkg/da/data_availability_header.go) for the implementation. Note on the implementation: celestia-app computes the hash in prepare_proposal and returns it to CometBFT via [`blockData.Hash`](https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-app/blob/5bbdac2d3f46662a34b2111602b8f964d6e6fba5/app/prepare_proposal.go#L78) so a modification to celestia-core isn't strictly necessary but [comments](https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-core/blob/2ec23f804691afc196d0104616e6c880d4c1ca41/types/block.go#L1041-L1042) were added.
+1. Modifications to how `DataHash` in the block header is determined. In CometBFT, `DataHash` is based on the transactions included in a block. In Celestia, block data (including transactions) are erasure coded into a data square to enable data availability sampling. In order for the header to contain a commitment to this data square, `DataHash` was modified to be the Merkle root of the row and column roots of the erasure coded data square. See [ADR 008](https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-core/blob/v0.34.x-celestia/docs/celestia-architecture/adr-008-updating-to-tendermint-v0.35.x.md?plain=1#L20) for the motivation or [celestia-app/pkg/da/data_availability_header.go](https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-app/blob/2f89956b22c4c3cfdec19b3b8601095af6f69804/pkg/da/data_availability_header.go) for the implementation. The `DataHash` is computed by the application in `PrepareProposal` and returned to `CometBFT` as the second to last transaction. The last transaction is the big endian encoded uint64 of the square size. The `SquareSize` is included in the modified `Data` struct that is gossiped to peers. Similarly `CometBFT` passes the `DataHash` as the second to last tx and the `SquareSize` as the final transaction in `ProcessProposal`.
+2. A content-addressable transaction (CAT) pool was implemented using the `Mempool` interface to reduce the duplication and thus bandwidth of peers sending transactions to one another. The specification can be found [here](./mempool/cat/spec.md).
 
 
 See [./docs/celestia-architecture](./docs/celestia-architecture/) for architecture decision records (ADRs) on Celestia modifications.

abci/example/kvstore/persistent_kvstore.go

@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ func (app *PersistentKVStoreApplication) BeginBlock(req types.RequestBeginBlock)
 
 	// Punish validators who committed equivocation.
 	for _, ev := range req.ByzantineValidators {
-		if ev.Type == types.EvidenceType_DUPLICATE_VOTE {
+		if ev.Type == types.MisbehaviorType_DUPLICATE_VOTE {
 			addr := string(ev.Validator.Address)
 			if pubKey, ok := app.valAddrToPubKeyMap[addr]; ok {
 				app.updateValidator(types.ValidatorUpdate{
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ func (app *PersistentKVStoreApplication) PrepareProposal(
 
 func (app *PersistentKVStoreApplication) ProcessProposal(
 	req types.RequestProcessProposal) types.ResponseProcessProposal {
-	return types.ResponseProcessProposal{Result: types.ResponseProcessProposal_ACCEPT}
+	return types.ResponseProcessProposal{Status: types.ResponseProcessProposal_ACCEPT}
 }
 
 //---------------------------------------------

abci/types/application.go

@@ -1,7 +1,10 @@
 package types
 
 import (
-	context "golang.org/x/net/context"
+	"context"
+	"encoding/binary"
+
+	"github.com/tendermint/tendermint/crypto/tmhash"
 )
 
 // Application is an interface that enables any finite, deterministic state machine
@@ -98,11 +101,15 @@ func (BaseApplication) ApplySnapshotChunk(req RequestApplySnapshotChunk) Respons
 }
 
 func (BaseApplication) PrepareProposal(req RequestPrepareProposal) ResponsePrepareProposal {
-	return ResponsePrepareProposal{BlockData: req.BlockData}
+	// we use placeholder values for the hash and square size
+	squareSizeBytes := make([]byte, 8)
+	binary.BigEndian.PutUint64(squareSizeBytes, 0)
+	req.Txs = append(req.Txs, tmhash.Sum(nil), squareSizeBytes)
+	return ResponsePrepareProposal{Txs: req.Txs}
 }
 
 func (BaseApplication) ProcessProposal(req RequestProcessProposal) ResponseProcessProposal {
-	return ResponseProcessProposal{Result: ResponseProcessProposal_ACCEPT}
+	return ResponseProcessProposal{Status: ResponseProcessProposal_ACCEPT}
 }
 
 //-------------------------------------------------------

abci/types/result.go

@@ -41,19 +41,20 @@ func (r ResponseQuery) IsErr() bool {
 	return r.Code != CodeTypeOK
 }
 
-// IsUnknown returns true if Code is Unknown
+// IsUnknown returns true if this ResponseProcessProposal status is unknown
+
 func (r ResponseProcessProposal) IsUnknown() bool {
-	return r.Result == ResponseProcessProposal_UNKNOWN
+	return r.Status == ResponseProcessProposal_UNKNOWN
 }
 
-// IsOK returns true if Code is OK
-func (r ResponseProcessProposal) IsOK() bool {
-	return r.Result == ResponseProcessProposal_ACCEPT
+// IsAccepted returns true if this ResponseProcessProposal was accepted
+func (r ResponseProcessProposal) IsAccepted() bool {
+	return r.Status == ResponseProcessProposal_ACCEPT
 }
 
 // IsRejected returns true if this ResponseProcessProposal was rejected
 func (r ResponseProcessProposal) IsRejected() bool {
-	return r.Result == ResponseProcessProposal_REJECT
+	return r.Status == ResponseProcessProposal_REJECT
 }
 
 //---------------------------------------------------------------------------