Implement diataxis #1742
Implement diataxis #1742
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes significant updates across several documentation files and a configuration file for a VitePress site. The Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@jcstein i have a few questions:
Thank you! |
yep! will review once done
let's try to keep the broken links to a minimum here if possible. wdyt? |
|
i'm going to take some time to review this and give you better answers on these points. as i realize this Issue inherently breaks a lot of links |
🔥
|
might be more organized, but yeah it'll break a lot of links |
Thanks for reviewing! |
I'm working on scoping out server-level redirects so this won't be an issue!
you're welcome! it was exciting to see. |
|
do you think adding subfolders in categories is necessary? I kind of like the shorter links, but am not sure. here's a table showing the old paths and the new paths that they should redirect to:
This table covers all the paths that have changed from the |
i don't think it's necessary, plus now that you outlined it like this, it does look more visually appealing😅 |
|
yeah my only real nitpick is that the links would get long! |
right. any other changes to be made? i think this is the best thing I've worked on so far😁 |
|
just waiting to hear back on redirects. agreed, this is awesome! |
|
and we'll get #1603 in once this is all done |
|
can you please double-check the link changes in the table of my comment above, before we make this live @Mackenzie-OO7 ? |
sure! hang on |
all good! |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (67)
index.md (2)
26-28: LGTM: New "How-to guides" feature aligns with diataxis framework.The addition of the "How-to guides" feature, replacing "Run a node", is a positive change that aligns well with the diataxis framework. It provides a clear category for step-by-step guides, which should improve user navigation and content accessibility.
Consider capitalizing "How-to Guides" in the title for consistency with other feature titles:
- title: How-to guides + title: How-to Guides
Line range hint
16-32: Overall changes align well with diataxis implementation.The updates to the homepage layout consistently reflect the implementation of the diataxis framework:
- The hero section link update directs users to more specific content.
- The new "How-to Guides" feature provides a clear category for step-by-step instructions.
- The "Tutorials" feature replacement offers a dedicated space for interactive learning content.
These changes should significantly improve content organization and user navigation, aligning with the PR objectives and the discussions in the comments.
To ensure a smooth transition, consider the following:
- Update any internal links in other documents that may be affected by these changes.
- Review and update the site's navigation menu to reflect the new structure.
- Consider creating redirects from old URLs to new ones to prevent broken links for existing users.
how-to-guides/sp1-blobstream-deploy.md (1)
Line range hint
7-38: LGTM! Consider adding a brief introduction.The new content is well-structured and provides comprehensive instructions for deploying SP1 Blobstream. It aligns perfectly with the "how-to guides" category of the diataxis framework.
Consider adding a brief introductory paragraph before the steps to provide context. For example:
SP1 Blobstream is a powerful tool for [brief description of its purpose]. This guide will walk you through the process of deploying SP1 Blobstream to a new chain, ensuring you have everything set up correctly for optimal performance.This addition would help users understand the importance of the deployment process before diving into the technical steps.
how-to-guides/celestia-app-wallet.md (1)
Line range hint
1-63: Consider a comprehensive documentation review.The changes in this file are consistent with the implementation of the diataxis framework and improve the organization of the documentation. However, given that these changes are likely part of a larger restructuring effort, it would be beneficial to conduct a comprehensive review of the entire documentation to ensure consistency and prevent broken links.
Consider the following steps:
- Perform a full documentation audit to identify all affected files and links.
- Update all cross-references throughout the documentation to reflect the new structure.
- Implement redirects for commonly accessed pages to prevent broken links for existing users.
- Update any external references to the documentation (e.g., in README files, external websites) to reflect the new structure.
- Consider creating a change log or migration guide for users familiar with the old documentation structure.
Would you like assistance in generating a script to perform a comprehensive link check across the entire documentation?
tutorials/integrate-celestia.md (1)
Line range hint
1-101: Overall changes align with diataxis implementation.The changes made to this document are minimal but significant in terms of improving the documentation structure. The updated links reflect the reorganization of content according to the diataxis framework, which should enhance the overall user experience. The content of the document remains accurate and comprehensive for service providers looking to integrate with Celestia.
Consider reviewing other documents in the documentation to ensure consistent link updates and organization according to the diataxis framework.
how-to-guides/blobstreamx.md (1)
Line range hint
1-100: Great progress on implementing the diataxis framework!The changes in this file demonstrate a clear move towards organizing the documentation according to the diataxis framework. By moving deployment and usage instructions to the "how-to-guides" section, you're improving the overall structure and navigability of the documentation.
A few points to consider as you continue this implementation:
- Consistency: Ensure all similar content across the documentation is moved to appropriate sections (e.g., all deployment guides to "how-to-guides").
- Navigation: Consider updating any navigation menus or indexes to reflect these new locations.
- Redirects: To minimize the impact of broken links, consider implementing redirects from the old URLs to the new ones.
To help manage this transition, consider creating a mapping document that tracks old URLs to new URLs. This can help in setting up redirects and updating any external references to your documentation.
how-to-guides/celestia-node.md (3)
Line range hint
1-73: LGTM! Improved installation instructions.The changes in the "Installing from source" section enhance clarity and provide more options for users. The addition of code groups for different network tags and the experimental build option are valuable improvements.
Consider adding a brief explanation of the differences between Mainnet Beta, Mocha, and Arabica networks to help users choose the appropriate version.
Line range hint
75-107: Great addition of pre-built binary information!The expanded section on installing pre-built binaries provides valuable information about supported operating systems and architectures. This will help users quickly determine if a pre-built binary is available for their system.
Consider adding instructions or a command for installing specific versions of the pre-built binary. This would be helpful for users who need to install a particular version for compatibility or testing purposes.
Line range hint
1-141: Overall: Excellent improvements aligned with diataxis implementation.The changes in this file significantly contribute to the PR's objective of implementing the diataxis framework and improving documentation structure. The enhancements include:
- More detailed and organized installation instructions
- Clear separation of installation methods (from source and pre-built binaries)
- Updated reference paths reflecting the new documentation structure
These improvements will enhance the user experience by making the documentation more accessible and easier to navigate.
As you continue implementing diataxis across the documentation:
- Ensure consistent naming conventions for directories (e.g., 'tutorials', 'how-to-guides') across all documentation files.
- Consider creating a documentation map or index that outlines the new structure, helping users and contributors understand the diataxis implementation.
how-to-guides/full-storage-node.md (2)
Line range hint
115-120: LGTM! Consider a minor clarification.The added tip provides valuable information about using Arabica devnet tokens for sovereign rollup testing. It's well-placed and relevant to the context.
Consider slightly rewording the last sentence for clarity:
- Mocha testnet as well, it is just mostly used for validator operations. + Mocha testnet, but it is primarily used for validator operations.This minor change enhances readability and precision.
Line range hint
126-146: LGTM! Consider a minor consistency improvement.The addition of network-specific commands in labeled code blocks greatly improves clarity and usability. This change aligns well with the PR objectives and documentation best practices.
For consistency with earlier sections, consider adding a note about Mainnet Beta not requiring a network declaration:
+ :::tip + You do not need to declare a network for Mainnet Beta. + :::This addition would reinforce the information provided earlier in the document.
how-to-guides/feegrant-for-blobs.md (1)
The "Granting fee allowances using celestia-node" section does not display any removed or replaced code as initially highlighted.
- Please ensure that all code changes, including removals and replacements, are clearly documented in the guide.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
28-61: Acknowledge streamlined instructions for granting fee allowances.The instructions for granting fee allowances have been streamlined, maintaining essential commands while improving clarity. This enhancement aligns with the overall goal of improving documentation usability.
To ensure the accuracy of the streamlined instructions:
The previous script encountered a syntax error and did not retrieve the intended section. Please run the corrected script below to extract the "Granting fee allowances using celestia-node" section for verification:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Display the content of the "Granting fee allowances" section for manual verification sed -n '/^## Granting fee allowances using celestia-node/,/^##/p' how-to-guides/feegrant-for-blobs.mdLength of output: 289
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Display the content of the "Granting fee allowances" section for manual verification sed -n '/^## Granting fee allowances using celestia-node/,/^## /p' how-to-guides/feegrant-for-blobs.mdLength of output: 1336
how-to-guides/instantiate-testnet.md (4)
Line range hint
23-45: LGTM: Improved clarity in working directory initializationThe changes in this section enhance the guide's clarity by providing specific examples and explaining the variables used in the commands. This will help users better understand and follow the instructions.
Consider adding a note explaining that users should replace
validator1with their own chosen validator name for clarity.
Line range hint
61-81: LGTM: Improved clarity for adding genesis accounts and validatorsThe changes in these sections enhance the guide's clarity, especially regarding the use of
$KEY_NAMEand the process for adding multiple validators. The highlighted note about sharing thegenesis.jsonfile is particularly important for multi-validator setups.Consider adding a brief explanation of the
utiadenomination in theTIA_AMOUNTvariable for users who might be unfamiliar with it.
Line range hint
106-134: LGTM: Improved structure and clarity for genesis JSON file creationThe restructured section provides a clearer process for creating and sharing the final
genesis.jsonfile. The detailed steps for collecting gentx files and updating thegenesis.jsonwill help users avoid potential mistakes.Consider adding a note about the importance of backing up the
genesis.jsonfile, as it's crucial for network recovery in case of issues.
Line range hint
136-177: LGTM: Improved network configuration and peering instructionsThe clarified instructions for modifying the config file and the new section on adding your node as a persistent peer significantly improve the guide. These changes will help users set up their network connections more effectively.
Consider adding a brief explanation of why persistent peers are important for network stability and how they differ from other types of peers.
how-to-guides/blobstream-contracts.md (7)
Line range hint
1-6: LGTM! Consider adding a description meta tag.The updates to the sidebar label and description provide more clarity about the content. The link change aligns with the new documentation structure.
Consider adding a
keywordsmeta tag to improve SEO. For example:keywords: Blobstream, L2, onchain logic, integration, Celestia
Line range hint
8-36: LGTM! Consider adding a version specification.The "Getting started" section provides clear and concise instructions for setting up the development environment and installing the Blobstream contracts. The note about the minimum Solidity compiler version is particularly helpful.
Consider specifying a version for the Blobstream contracts in the installation command to ensure reproducibility:
forge install celestiaorg/blobstream-contracts@<version> --no-commitReplace
<version>with the latest stable version or a specific commit hash.
Line range hint
38-89: LGTM! Consider adding comments and a note about the stub function.The example Solidity contract effectively demonstrates how to integrate with Blobstream for data verification in a ZK rollup context. The code is well-structured and includes necessary imports.
- Consider adding more inline comments to explain the purpose of each step in the
submitRollupBlockfunction.- Add a note explaining that the
verifyZKPfunction is a stub for demonstration purposes and should be replaced with actual ZK proof verification logic in a real implementation.- Consider adding error messages to the
requirestatements for better debugging:require( blobstream.verifyAttestation(_blobstream_nonce, _tuple, _proof), "Blobstream attestation verification failed" ); require(verifyZKP(_rollup_block_hash, _zk_proof, _tuple.dataRoot), "ZKP verification failed");
Line range hint
91-104: LGTM! Consider adding a visual representation.The explanations of the
DataRootTupleandBinaryMerkleProofstructures are clear and concise. The links to the source code are helpful for developers who want to explore further.Consider adding a simple diagram or visual representation of how
DataRootTuples are organized in the Merkle tree. This could help visual learners better understand the concept.
Line range hint
106-114: LGTM! Consider adding a code snippet.The explanation of the
IDAOracleinterface and itsverifyAttestationmethod is clear and concise. The analogy to verifying a block header in the Celestia chain helps in understanding the concept.Consider adding a small code snippet showing the function signature of
verifyAttestationto give developers a quick reference. For example:function verifyAttestation( uint256 nonce, DataRootTuple calldata tuple, BinaryMerkleProof calldata proof ) external view returns (bool);
Line range hint
116-124: LGTM! Consider expanding on the DAVerifier library.The links to additional documentation on proof queries and fraud proofs are helpful. The mention of the
DAVerifierlibrary is important for developers working on fraud-proof based L2s.
- Consider adding a brief explanation of what the
DAVerifierlibrary does and why it's important for fraud-proof based L2s.- If possible, provide a small code snippet demonstrating how to use the
DAVerifierlibrary in conjunction with theIDAOracleinterface.- Add a note about the importance of understanding these concepts for developers working on L2 solutions that interact with Celestia.
Line range hint
126-190: LGTM! Consider adding code examples and a summary table.The detailed explanations of the
DAVerifierlibrary functions are thorough and provide valuable information for developers. The descriptions effectively highlight the responsibilities of the user, which is crucial for correct usage.
- Consider adding short code snippets demonstrating how to call each function, including typical parameter values.
- Add a summary table at the beginning or end of this section, listing each function with a one-line description of its purpose. This would provide a quick reference for developers.
- Consider adding a note about error handling and potential edge cases for each function.
- The link to the next section is good, but consider adding a brief preview of what developers can expect to learn in the "blobstream-offchain.md" section.
how-to-guides/arbitrum-integration.md (3)
25-32: LGTM: Key components section enhanced with new content and improved structure.The addition of the table of contents and the new subsection on the Ethereum fallback mechanism improves the document's structure and aligns well with the diataxis framework. This enhancement will help readers navigate the document more easily.
Consider adding a brief explanation of what the Ethereum fallback mechanism is in the additional paragraph (line 32) to give readers a quick overview before they reach the detailed section.
Line range hint
33-58: LGTM: DA provider implementation section provides valuable information.The added details about running a Batch Poster node and a Nitro node are informative and helpful for users implementing the integration. The section effectively explains the key components and considerations.
Consider using an absolute link instead of a relative link for the community RPC endpoints (line 50). This will ensure the link remains valid even if the file structure changes in the future.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[typographical] ~51-~51: The word “otherwise” is an adverb that can’t be used like a conjunction, and therefore needs to be separated from the sentence.
Context: ... in BlobstreamX and if the verification succeeds, otherwise it will discard the batch. Since it wil...(THUS_SENTENCE)
Line range hint
96-116: LGTM: New Ethereum fallback mechanism section is informative and well-integrated.The addition of this section enhances the document's completeness and aligns well with the diataxis framework. It provides valuable information about the Ethereum fallback mechanism and its implementation in the Celestia integration.
Consider adding a brief explanation of why the Ethereum fallback mechanism is important for the integration. This would help readers understand its significance in the context of the Celestia-Arbitrum integration.
community/foundation-delegation-program.md (3)
Line range hint
89-90: Enhanced eligibility criteriaThe additions to the eligibility criteria provide valuable specificity:
- Requiring a fully archival bridge node for both Mainnet Beta and Mocha enhances data availability and network robustness.
- Prohibiting infrastructure in Hetzner or OVH promotes network diversity and resilience.
These changes align well with the program's objectives and the diataxis framework implementation.
Consider adding a brief explanation or link to why Hetzner and OVH are prohibited, to provide context for applicants who may not be familiar with these restrictions.
Line range hint
108-115: Clarified undelegation criteriaThe expanded undelegation criteria provide valuable clarity:
- Specifying the consequences of multiple jailings during the delegation period.
- Setting a clear timeframe for node upgrades (24 hours or less).
- Adding a clause for compliance with applicable law and Foundation discretion.
These additions enhance the transparency and fairness of the program, aligning well with the diataxis framework implementation.
For consistency, consider specifying the exact number of times a validator can be jailed before undelegation (e.g., "Getting jailed more than twice during the cohort's applicable delegation period").
Line range hint
186-186: Consider relocating the important noteThe addition of the note emphasizing the requirement for fully archival bridge nodes is valuable. However, its current placement at the end of the document might reduce its visibility.
Consider moving this important note to a more prominent location, such as:
- Directly under the "Eligibility criteria" section.
- In a new "Key Requirements" section near the beginning of the document.
- As a callout box or highlighted section within the "Eligibility criteria".
This relocation would ensure that this critical information is not overlooked by potential applicants.
how-to-guides/blobstream.md (3)
Line range hint
1-38: LGTM! Consider adding a brief explanation of diataxis.The introduction and "What is Blobstream?" section have been significantly improved. The content is clear, informative, and aligns well with the PR objectives of implementing diataxis.
To further enhance the documentation's alignment with diataxis principles, consider adding a brief explanation of how this guide fits into the diataxis framework (e.g., whether it's a tutorial, how-to guide, explanation, or reference).
Line range hint
73-111: LGTM! Consider adding a brief comparison with Blobstream X.The "What is SP1 Blobstream?" section provides a comprehensive explanation of SP1 Blobstream, its functionality, and its role in bridging Celestia's data to Ethereum. The content is well-structured and informative.
To further improve this section, consider adding a brief comparison between SP1 Blobstream and Blobstream X, highlighting the key differences or improvements. This would provide readers with a clearer understanding of the evolution of Blobstream implementations.
Line range hint
113-145: LGTM! Consider adding estimated integration time.The "Integrate with SP1 Blobstream" section provides comprehensive integration instructions and valuable links to resources. The structure aligns well with diataxis principles by clearly separating different aspects of integration.
To further enhance this section, consider adding an estimated time for completing the integration process. This would help developers plan their work more effectively.
how-to-guides/validator-node.md (1)
Line range hint
252-293: LGTM! Great addition of the FAQ section. Consider a minor clarification.The addition of the FAQ section is valuable and provides clear instructions for resolving a common issue. This enhances the overall usefulness of the document for users setting up and maintaining validator nodes.
For improved clarity, consider adding a brief explanation of what the error means before diving into the resolution steps. This context can help users better understand the issue they're facing.
Consider adding a brief explanation at the beginning of the FAQ entry, such as:
### `+2/3 committed an invalid block: wrong Block.Header.Version` This error occurs when your node is running an outdated version of the software that is incompatible with the current network state. It typically happens after a network upgrade. Here's how to resolve it: [existing content follows]how-to-guides/ibc-relayer.md (1)
Line range hint
1-24: Summary: Changes align well with diataxis implementationThe updates made to this file are consistent with the PR objective of implementing the diataxis framework for documentation organization. Both link changes appropriately move content to the "how-to-guides" section, which improves the structure and accessibility of the documentation.
If you need any assistance with updating other files or ensuring consistency across the documentation, please let me know, and I'd be happy to help or provide guidance.
how-to-guides/blobstream-offchain.md (5)
Line range hint
1-54: LGTM! Consider adding a brief explanation of zero-knowledge proofs.The introductory section and initial code block provide a clear and concise overview of Blobstream integration for rollups. The structure definitions are well-commented and align with the Blobstream requirements.
To enhance clarity for readers who might be less familiar with the concept, consider adding a brief explanation or link to resources about zero-knowledge proofs when mentioning them in the introduction.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~108-~108: Consider using a more formal alternative.
Context: ...lestia.org/). Additionally, if you need more information on how to run a light node, you can [ch...(MORE_INFO)
Line range hint
95-160: LGTM! Consider elaborating on the p2p network suggestion.The Rollup Sequencer section provides clear explanations of the roles and responsibilities of the sequencer and full node. The interface definitions for
CelestiaLightNodeClientandEthereumClientare well-structured and include the necessary methods for Blobstream integration.The note about potentially improving the header retrieval process by using a p2p network or direct sequencer communication is valuable. Consider expanding on this suggestion by briefly explaining the potential benefits and trade-offs of this approach compared to waiting for the head to be posted to Ethereum.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~108-~108: Consider using a more formal alternative.
Context: ...lestia.org/). Additionally, if you need more information on how to run a light node, you can [ch...(MORE_INFO)
Line range hint
198-268: LGTM! Consider adding error handling for signature creation.The Creating Blocks section provides a clear and accurate explanation of the block creation process and header posting to Ethereum. The
ProduceBlockandUpdateHeadersmethods are well-implemented and align with the described processes.One minor suggestion for improvement:
In the
ProduceBlockmethod, consider adding error handling for the signature creation:- signature := s.key.Sign(header.SignBytes()) + signature, err := s.key.Sign(header.SignBytes()) + if err != nil { + return Block{}, fmt.Errorf("failed to sign header: %w", err) + }This change would make the error handling more robust and consistent with the rest of the method.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~108-~108: Consider using a more formal alternative.
Context: ...lestia.org/). Additionally, if you need more information on how to run a light node, you can [ch...(MORE_INFO)
Line range hint
270-340: LGTM! Consider adding a check for the previous block hash.The Rollup Full Node section provides a comprehensive explanation of different mechanisms for downloading blocks. The
AddBlockandGetLatestBlockmethods are well-implemented and align with the described processes.One suggestion for improvement:
In the
AddBlockmethod, consider adding a check for the previous block hash to ensure the integrity of the blockchain:if b.Header.Height != uint64(len(f.Blocks)+1) { return fmt.Errorf("failure to add block: expected block height %d, got %d", len(f.Blocks)+1, b.Header.Height) } + if len(f.Blocks) > 0 && !bytes.Equal(b.Header.PreviousHash, f.Blocks[len(f.Blocks)-1].Header.Hash()) { + return fmt.Errorf("failure to add block: invalid previous block hash") + } // Check the sequencer's signature if !b.Header.SequencerSignature.IsValid(f.SequencerAddress) { return fmt.Errorf("failure to add block: invalid sequencer signature") }This additional check would enhance the security and consistency of the blockchain.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~108-~108: Consider using a more formal alternative.
Context: ...lestia.org/). Additionally, if you need more information on how to run a light node, you can [ch...(MORE_INFO)
Line range hint
342-365: LGTM! Consider adding a brief introduction to the More Documentation section.The More Documentation section provides valuable links to additional resources on key topics related to Blobstream integration. The brief descriptions accompanying each link give readers a clear idea of what to expect from the additional documentation.
To improve the section further, consider adding a brief introduction explaining the purpose of these additional resources and how they complement the main guide. For example:
### More Documentation The following resources provide in-depth information on specific aspects of Blobstream integration. These documents will help you implement and understand the technical details of the processes described in this guide.This addition would provide more context for the reader and reinforce the structure of the documentation.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~108-~108: Consider using a more formal alternative.
Context: ...lestia.org/). Additionally, if you need more information on how to run a light node, you can [ch...(MORE_INFO)
how-to-guides/blobstream-x-deploy.md (7)
Line range hint
12-86: Enhance security and error handling in deployment instructionsThe instructions for deploying the SuccinctGateway contract are comprehensive and well-structured. However, consider the following improvements:
- Add a step to verify the contract source code after deployment.
- Include instructions for securely managing the
.envfile, such as adding it to.gitignore.- Suggest using a hardware wallet for increased security when deploying contracts.
- Add error handling instructions, such as what to do if the deployment fails.
Consider adding these additional steps to enhance the security and robustness of the deployment process.
Line range hint
88-122: Add context and security considerations for function verifier deploymentThe instructions for deploying function verifiers are clear. However, consider the following additions:
- Explain the importance of function verifiers in the overall Blobstream X architecture.
- Emphasize the security implications of these verifiers and the need for careful management.
- Suggest a process for verifying the integrity of downloaded binaries.
- Add a note about keeping the function verifier contracts updated and the potential need for upgrades.
These additions would provide more context and highlight the critical nature of these components in the system.
Line range hint
124-186: Enhance explanations for function verifier registration and whitelistingThe instructions for registering function verifiers and managing whitelisting are detailed. Consider the following improvements:
- Provide more context on the implications of each whitelist status (Default, Custom, Disabled).
- Explain the security considerations for each whitelisting option.
- Add examples of scenarios where each whitelist status might be appropriate.
- Include a note about monitoring and auditing registered function verifiers and whitelisted provers.
These additions would help users make more informed decisions about their deployment configuration and understand the potential impacts on system security and performance.
Line range hint
188-275: Enhance explanations and security considerations for BlobstreamX deploymentThe instructions for deploying the BlobstreamX contract are detailed and well-structured. Consider the following additions:
- Provide more context on the importance of the trusted header and the potential risks of using an outdated or compromised header.
- Explain the implications of different
GENESIS_HEIGHTvalues and how they affect the system's security and performance.- Add a note about the importance of securely managing the
PRIVATE_KEYandGUARDIAN_ADDRESS.- Include instructions for verifying the deployed contract and its initial state.
These additions would help users understand the critical nature of the deployment process and the potential long-term impacts of their configuration choices.
Line range hint
277-334: Provide more context on prover options and trade-offsThe instructions for running a local prover and a proof replayer are clear. Consider the following additions:
- Provide a comparison table of the pros and cons of running a local prover vs. using a proof replayer.
- Explain the performance implications and hardware requirements for each option in more detail.
- Add guidance on choosing between the two options based on different deployment scenarios or requirements.
- Include information about monitoring and maintaining the prover or replayer over time.
These additions would help users make a more informed decision about which option to choose for their specific use case and understand the long-term operational implications.
Line range hint
336-435: Enhance context and guidance for regenerating artifactsThe instructions for regenerating the verifier build and building circuits are detailed and informative. Consider the following additions:
- Provide more context on when and why users might need to regenerate these artifacts.
- Explain the potential risks and benefits of using regenerated artifacts vs. downloaded ones.
- Add a note about verifying the integrity of the regenerated artifacts.
- Include guidance on version control and documentation for regenerated artifacts.
These additions would help users understand the implications of regenerating artifacts and make informed decisions about whether to use this option.
Line range hint
1-435: Comprehensive update to Blobstream X deployment guideThe extensive updates to this deployment guide significantly improve the documentation for Blobstream X. The new content provides detailed, step-by-step instructions for deploying and running various components of the system.
Consider the following high-level improvements:
- Add an introduction section explaining the overall architecture of Blobstream X and how the different components interact.
- Include a glossary of key terms and concepts used throughout the guide.
- Create a troubleshooting section addressing common issues that might arise during deployment.
- Add diagrams or flowcharts to visually represent the deployment process and system architecture.
These additions would further enhance the guide's usability and help users better understand the system they are deploying.
how-to-guides/blobstream-rollups.md (2)
54-54: Link update is correct, but consider formatting.The link for "data root tuple proof to the data root tuple" has been correctly updated to the new path structure. However, to maintain consistent formatting with the numbered list, consider adjusting the indentation:
- 4. [data root tuple proof to the data root tuple](https://docs.celestia.org/how-to-guides/blobstream-proof-queries#the-commitment-scheme): + 4. [data root tuple proof to the data root tuple](https://docs.celestia.org/how-to-guides/blobstream-proof-queries#the-commitment-scheme):This will ensure the numbered list remains properly formatted.
301-301: Minor: Consider line length.Markdownlint has flagged this line as exceeding the recommended 80-character limit (current length: 96). While this is a minor issue, you may want to consider breaking this line for improved readability:
-[proof queries](https://docs.celestia.org/how-to-guides/blobstream-proof-queries) documentation. +[proof queries](https://docs.celestia.org/how-to-guides/blobstream-proof-queries) +documentation.However, this is a low-priority change and can be addressed at your discretion.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
301-301: Expected: 80; Actual: 96
Line length(MD013, line-length)
tutorials/node-tutorial.md (6)
36-36: LGTM! Minor suggestion for consistency.The changes in this section improve the clarity and navigation of the tutorial. The updated links to the how-to guides are helpful for users.
For consistency, consider updating the link text in line 36 to match the others:
-[guide to sync from trusted hash and height](../how-to-guides/celestia-node-trusted-hash.md). +[guide to sync from trusted hash and height](../how-to-guides/celestia-node-trusted-hash.md).Also applies to: 57-58
98-100: LGTM! Consider adding a note about network selection.The updates to this section greatly improve the clarity of the instructions and provide options for users on different networks. The added tip about RPC endpoints is valuable information.
Consider adding a brief note before the code blocks explaining that users should choose the appropriate command based on their target network. This could help prevent confusion for new users.
Also applies to: 128-130
159-160: LGTM! Consider adding a note about mainnet funding.The updates to this section provide excellent guidance for setting up and funding wallets, especially for testnet users.
Consider adding a brief note about how users can obtain tokens for Mainnet Beta, as the current instructions focus on testnet faucets. This could be helpful for users who are working with the mainnet.
255-255: LGTM! Consider adding a note about gas estimation.The updates to the RPC CLI guide section significantly improve its usability. The added examples and explanations are very helpful for users.
In the section about setting gas price (around line 577), consider adding a brief note about how users can estimate the appropriate gas price for their transactions. This could help users avoid overpaying or having their transactions fail due to insufficient gas.
Also applies to: 577-577
577-577: LGTM! Consider adding a note about example customization.The expanded examples section is excellent, providing a wide range of practical use cases for the RPC CLI.
Consider adding a brief note at the beginning of the examples section encouraging users to modify the example commands to fit their specific needs (e.g., replacing addresses, amounts, etc. with their own values). This could help prevent copy-paste errors.
577-577: LGTM! Consider adding a security note.The additional resources section provides valuable information for advanced users and addresses common issues effectively.
In the section about submitting a blob using curl, consider adding a brief security note reminding users to be cautious when using authentication tokens in curl commands, especially on shared systems. This could help prevent accidental exposure of sensitive information.
how-to-guides/arbitrum-deploy.md (5)
37-39: LGTM! Minor suggestion for improvement.The updates to the links for the Mocha testnet light node and faucet are correct and reflect the new documentation structure. Specifying the version of the light node (v0.13.2) is a good practice for ensuring compatibility.
Consider adding a note explaining why this specific version (v0.13.2) is required, or if it's the minimum supported version. This would help users understand the importance of using this particular version.
Line range hint
228-258: Excellent addition! Consider a minor clarification.The new step explaining the importance of using a WebSocket (WSS) connection for the Batch Poster is a crucial addition. It clearly explains why this is necessary and provides a helpful guide on obtaining a WSS URL from Alchemy.
Consider adding a brief note mentioning alternative RPC providers that offer WSS connections for Arbitrum Sepolia, in case users prefer options other than Alchemy. This would provide more flexibility for users setting up their environments.
Line range hint
280-301: Great addition of Celestia DA configuration! Consider a minor enhancement.The new
celestia-cfgconfiguration object innodeConfig.jsonis a crucial addition for enabling Celestia DA in the Arbitrum chain. The explanation of each parameter is clear and helpful.Consider adding a brief example or explanation of how to generate or obtain a valid
namespace-id. While you mention usingopenssl rand -hex 10, it might be helpful to explain any constraints or best practices for choosing a namespace ID.
Line range hint
415-421: Excellent update to the compatibility matrix!The updated compatibility matrix provides crucial information about the specific versions of Nitro, Contracts, Orbit SDK, and celestia-node that are compatible with this integration. The inclusion of links to specific releases and commits is very helpful.
Consider adding a note about how often this compatibility matrix is updated or where users can find the most up-to-date compatibility information. This would help future-proof the documentation and ensure users always have access to the latest compatibility details.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~417-~417: Consider using “incompatible” to avoid wordiness.
Context: ...rbit-sdk/releases/tag/v0.8.2) | This is not compatible with Orbit SDK v0.8.2 or with the lates...(NOT_ABLE_PREMIUM)
Line range hint
423-507: Comprehensive addition of deployment details!The new sections for Arbitrum Sepolia and Base Sepolia deployments provide crucial information for users setting up their systems. The organization of the contract addresses is clear and easy to reference.
Consider adding a brief note at the beginning of this section mentioning how frequently these addresses are updated or where users can verify the latest deployment addresses. This would help with the long-term maintainability of the documentation and ensure users always have access to the most current deployment information.
.vitepress/config.ts (3)
25-139: Consider implementing dark mode favicons and ensure privacy complianceThe head configuration is comprehensive, but there are two points to consider:
- There are commented-out sections for dark mode favicons. Consider implementing these for better user experience in dark mode.
- Analytics scripts (Chatbase and Plausible) are included. Ensure that their usage complies with relevant privacy regulations (e.g., GDPR, CCPA) and that users are properly informed about data collection.
142-179: LGTM: Theme configuration is well-structuredThe theme configuration is comprehensive and well-organized. The use of separate functions for navigation and sidebar structures is a good practice for maintainability.
Consider evaluating the trade-offs between the current local search provider and potential external search providers in terms of performance and feature set, especially if the documentation grows significantly in size.
181-231: Optimize font file matching in transformHead functionThe preloading of custom fonts is a good practice for performance. However, the regular expressions used to find the font files could be more specific to avoid potential false matches.
Consider updating the regular expressions to be more precise:
- const ruberoidLightFont = assets.find( - (file) => /Ruberoid-Light\.\w+\.otf/, - ); + const ruberoidLightFont = assets.find( + (file) => /Ruberoid-Light\.\w+\.otf$/.test(file) + );Apply similar changes for
ruberoidRegularFontandruberoidBoldFont.how-to-guides/blobstream-proof-queries.md (5)
Line range hint
11-37: Consider enhancing error handling in the code snippetThe prerequisites section is informative and provides a useful code snippet. However, the error handling in the code could be improved for better robustness.
Consider updating the error handling as follows:
trpc, err := http.New("<rpc_endpoint>", "/websocket") if err != nil { - ... + return fmt.Errorf("failed to create RPC client: %w", err) } err = trpc.Start() if err != nil { - return err + return fmt.Errorf("failed to start RPC client: %w", err) } defer func(trpc *http.HTTP) { err := trpc.Stop() if err != nil { - ... + log.Printf("failed to stop RPC client: %v", err) } }(trpc)This change provides more context in error messages and uses proper error wrapping.
Line range hint
116-146: Improve formatting of go.mod noteThe introduction to the hands-on demonstration is clear and informative. However, the formatting of the go.mod note could be improved for better readability.
Consider updating the note as follows:
-:::tip NOTE -For the go client snippets, make sure to have the following replaces in -your `go.mod`: +:::tip NOTE +For the go client snippets, ensure your `go.mod` file includes the following replace directives: + +```go +replace ( + github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk => github.com/celestiaorg/cosmos-sdk v1.18.3-sdk-v0.46.14 + github.com/gogo/protobuf => github.com/regen-network/protobuf v1.3.3-alpha.regen.1 + github.com/syndtr/goleveldb => github.com/syndtr/goleveldb v1.0.1-0.20210819022825-2ae1ddf74ef7 + github.com/tendermint/tendermint => github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-core v1.32.0-tm-v0.34.29 +) +``` -<!-- markdownlint-disable MD013 --> - -```go -// go.mod - github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk => github.com/celestiaorg/cosmos-sdk v1.18.3-sdk-v0.46.14 - github.com/gogo/protobuf => github.com/regen-network/protobuf v1.3.3-alpha.regen.1 - github.com/syndtr/goleveldb => github.com/syndtr/goleveldb v1.0.1-0.20210819022825-2ae1ddf74ef7 - github.com/tendermint/tendermint => github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-core v1.32.0-tm-v0.34.29 - -) -``` - -<!-- markdownlint-enable MD013 --> - Also, make sure to update the versions to match the latest `github.com/celestiaorg/cosmos-sdk` and `github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-core` versions. :::This change improves the readability of the go.mod replace directives and removes unnecessary markdown comments.
Line range hint
148-262: Enhance visibility of base64 encoding noteThe explanation of the data root inclusion proof is comprehensive and well-illustrated with both HTTP and Golang examples. However, the important note about base64 encoding could be made more prominent.
Consider updating the note as follows:
-> **_NOTE:_** These values are base64 encoded. For these to be usable -> with the solidity smart contract, they need to be converted to `bytes32`. -> Check the next section for more information. +:::warning +**Base64 Encoding Notice** +The values returned by this query are base64 encoded. To use them with Solidity smart contracts, they must be converted to `bytes32`. +Refer to the next section for details on this conversion process. +:::This change makes the note more visible and emphasizes its importance to the reader.
Line range hint
264-568: Consider breaking down the example for better readabilityThe full example provided is comprehensive and covers the entire process of proving Celestia block commitment. However, the length of the code snippet might be overwhelming for readers.
Consider breaking down this example into smaller, more focused sections. For instance:
- Initialization and setup
- Querying the transaction and block
- Retrieving the nonce and event data
- Creating and submitting the proof
Each section could have its own code snippet and explanation. This would make the example easier to follow and understand. Additionally, consider adding inline comments to explain key steps in the process.
For example:
// 1. Initialization and setup func verify() error { ctx := context.Background() // Initialize Tendermint RPC client trpc, err := http.New("tcp://localhost:26657", "/websocket") if err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("failed to create RPC client: %w", err) } // ... (rest of the initialization) // 2. Querying the transaction and block // Get the PayForBlob transaction tx, err := trpc.Tx(ctx, []byte("tx_hash"), true) if err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("failed to get transaction: %w", err) } // Get the block containing the transaction blockRes, err := trpc.Block(ctx, &tx.Height) if err != nil { return fmt.Errorf("failed to get block: %w", err) } // 3. Retrieving the nonce and event data // ... (code for retrieving nonce and event data) // 4. Creating and submitting the proof // ... (code for creating and submitting the proof) }This structure would make the example more digestible and easier to follow.
Line range hint
570-705: Enhance and standardize base64 encoding noteThe explanation of the transaction inclusion proof is clear and well-illustrated with both HTTP and Golang examples. However, the note about base64 encoding could be made more prominent and consistent with the previous similar note.
Consider updating the note as follows:
-> > **_NOTE:_** The values are base64 encoded. For these to be usable -> with the solidity smart contract, they need to be converted to `bytes32`. -> Check the next section for more information. +:::warning +**Base64 Encoding Notice** +The values returned by this query are base64 encoded. To use them with Solidity smart contracts, they must be converted to `bytes32`. +Refer to the next section for details on this conversion process. +:::This change makes the note more visible, emphasizes its importance to the reader, and maintains consistency with the previous similar note.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (50)
- .vitepress/config.ts (1 hunks)
- community/foundation-delegation-program.md (1 hunks)
- how-to-guides/arabica-devnet.md (1 hunks)
- how-to-guides/arbitrum-bridge.md (1 hunks)
- how-to-guides/arbitrum-deploy.md (2 hunks)
- how-to-guides/arbitrum-integration.md (2 hunks)
- how-to-guides/blobstream-contracts.md (1 hunks)
- how-to-guides/blobstream-offchain.md (1 hunks)
- how-to-guides/blobstream-proof-queries.md (2 hunks)
- how-to-guides/blobstream-rollups.md (6 hunks)
- how-to-guides/blobstream-x-deploy.md (1 hunks)
- how-to-guides/blobstream-x-requesting-data-commitment-ranges.md (2 hunks)
- how-to-guides/blobstream.md (1 hunks)
- how-to-guides/blobstreamx.md (1 hunks)
- how-to-guides/bridge-node.md (2 hunks)
- how-to-guides/bubs-testnet.md (2 hunks)
- how-to-guides/build-whatever.md (1 hunks)
- how-to-guides/celestia-app-metrics.md (1 hunks)
- how-to-guides/celestia-app-vesting.md (4 hunks)
- how-to-guides/celestia-app-wallet.md (2 hunks)
- how-to-guides/celestia-node-custom-networks.md (1 hunks)
- how-to-guides/celestia-node-metrics.md (1 hunks)
- how-to-guides/celestia-node-troubleshooting.md (1 hunks)
- how-to-guides/celestia-node.md (1 hunks)
- how-to-guides/decide-node.md (1 hunks)
- how-to-guides/docker-images.md (2 hunks)
- how-to-guides/ethereum-fallback.md (1 hunks)
- how-to-guides/feegrant-for-blobs.md (1 hunks)
- how-to-guides/full-storage-node.md (2 hunks)
- how-to-guides/ibc-relayer.md (2 hunks)
- how-to-guides/instantiate-testnet.md (1 hunks)
- how-to-guides/intro-to-op-stack.md (1 hunks)
- how-to-guides/light-node.md (4 hunks)
- how-to-guides/mainnet.md (0 hunks)
- how-to-guides/mocha-testnet.md (0 hunks)
- how-to-guides/optimism.md (1 hunks)
- how-to-guides/sp1-blobstream-deploy.md (1 hunks)
- how-to-guides/submit-data.md (2 hunks)
- how-to-guides/transaction-resubmission.md (1 hunks)
- how-to-guides/validator-node.md (3 hunks)
- index.md (2 hunks)
- learn/paying-for-blobspace.md (2 hunks)
- learn/staking-governance-supply.md (3 hunks)
- learn/staking.md (2 hunks)
- tutorials/celestia-node-key.md (5 hunks)
- tutorials/golang-client-tutorial.md (1 hunks)
- tutorials/integrate-celestia.md (2 hunks)
- tutorials/node-tutorial.md (7 hunks)
- tutorials/prompt-scavenger.md (2 hunks)
- tutorials/rust-client-tutorial.md (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- how-to-guides/mainnet.md
- how-to-guides/mocha-testnet.md
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (7)
- how-to-guides/arbitrum-bridge.md
- how-to-guides/celestia-node-troubleshooting.md
- how-to-guides/ethereum-fallback.md
- how-to-guides/submit-data.md
- learn/paying-for-blobspace.md
- learn/staking.md
- tutorials/golang-client-tutorial.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
how-to-guides/blobstream-rollups.md
301-301: Expected: 80; Actual: 96
Line length(MD013, line-length)
🔇 Additional comments (105)
how-to-guides/decide-node.md (1)
16-16: LGTM! Verify the new tutorial location.The hyperlink update aligns well with the diataxis framework implementation, moving the tutorial to a dedicated "tutorials" folder. This change supports better organization and categorization of documentation content.
To ensure the change doesn't introduce broken links, please run the following verification script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified! The new tutorial file exists and all references to the old path have been updated.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the new tutorial file and check for any remaining references to the old path. # Test 1: Check if the new tutorial file exists if fd -p "../tutorials/node-tutorial.md"; then echo "New tutorial file exists." else echo "Warning: New tutorial file not found at ../tutorials/node-tutorial.md" fi # Test 2: Check for any remaining references to the old path if rg --type md "../developers/node-tutorial.md"; then echo "Warning: Found references to the old tutorial path. Please update them." else echo "No references to the old tutorial path found." fiLength of output: 272
how-to-guides/celestia-node-custom-networks.md (1)
21-21: LGTM! Verify the new link and update any remaining references.The update to the reference link aligns with the PR objective of implementing diataxis and reorganizing the documentation structure. This change moves the node tutorial from the "developers" to the "tutorials" directory, which seems appropriate.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce broken links, please run the following verification steps:
Please review the results of these tests and update any remaining references to the old path if found.
index.md (2)
16-16: LGTM: Link update aligns with diataxis implementation.The change from
/developers/build-whateverto/how-to-guides/build-whateveris consistent with the PR objective of implementing the diataxis framework. This update improves the organization of content by placing it in a more specific and appropriate category.
30-32: LGTM: "Tutorials" feature update improves content organization.The replacement of the "Developers" feature with "Tutorials" is a positive change that aligns with the diataxis framework. This update provides a clearer categorization of content and should help users find relevant information more easily.
The details have been updated as per the previous suggestion, which improves clarity and specificity. The new link to
/tutorials/node-apiis consistent with the reorganized structure.how-to-guides/transaction-resubmission.md (2)
Line range hint
1-18: Summary: Changes align with diataxis implementation.The modifications in this file are consistent with the PR objectives of implementing the diataxis framework for documentation organization. The updates to the RPC provider links reflect a restructuring of the documentation, moving content from a 'nodes' directory to a 'how-to-guides' directory. This change supports better categorization and accessibility of information, which is a key principle of the diataxis approach.
The core content about transaction resubmission remains unchanged, maintaining the integrity of the technical information while improving its organization within the broader documentation structure.
17-18: LGTM! Verify new link paths.The updated links for RPC providers (Mainnet Beta, Mocha, and Arabica) align with the PR objectives of implementing the diataxis framework. The change from
../nodes/to../how-to-guides/is consistent across all three links, indicating a systematic reorganization of the documentation structure.To ensure the new links are correct and functional, please run the following script:
This script will help confirm that the new files exist in the correct location and contain the expected content.
✅ Verification successful
Links Verified Successfully
The updated RPC provider links for Mainnet Beta, Mocha, and Arabica have been verified and are correct. All links point to existing files containing the expected "production rpc endpoints" anchor.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the new link destinations # Test: Check if the new files exist fd -e md -p "how-to-guides/(mainnet|mocha-testnet|arabica-devnet).md" # Test: Verify that the files contain the expected anchor rg -i "production rpc endpoints" "how-to-guides/(mainnet|mocha-testnet|arabica-devnet).md"Length of output: 348
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that each RPC provider file contains the expected anchor files=("how-to-guides/arabica-devnet.md" "how-to-guides/mainnet.md" "how-to-guides/mocha-testnet.md") for file in "${files[@]}"; do if [ -f "$file" ]; then echo "Checking $file for 'production rpc endpoints'..." rg -i "production rpc endpoints" "$file" else echo "File $file does not exist." fi doneLength of output: 1073
how-to-guides/sp1-blobstream-deploy.md (2)
Line range hint
1-38: Overall, excellent implementation of diataxis framework.The changes in this file successfully align the documentation with the diataxis framework. The updated link structure and the addition of detailed deployment instructions enhance the user experience and improve the organization of the documentation. The content is well-suited for the "how-to guides" category, providing clear and actionable steps for users.
4-4: LGTM! Verify link consistency across documentation.The link update aligns with the diataxis framework implementation. This change improves the organization of the documentation.
To ensure consistency and prevent broken links, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Link consistency verified.
The link has been successfully updated across the documentation with no remaining references to the old structure. All links are consistent and functioning as intended.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old link structure # Test: Search for old link structure. Expect: No results. rg --type md '/developers/blobstreamx' # Test: Verify new link exists. Expect: At least one result. rg --type md '/how-to-guides/blobstreamx'Length of output: 261
how-to-guides/celestia-app-wallet.md (2)
63-63: LGTM! Verify the new troubleshooting link.The link update from
../nodes/celestia-node-troubleshooting.md#portsto../how-to-guides/celestia-node-troubleshooting.md#portsis consistent with the diataxis framework implementation. This change improves the organization of the documentation.Please run the following script to verify the existence of the new troubleshooting guide location and the presence of the #ports section:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the new troubleshooting guide location and the #ports section # Test: Check if the new troubleshooting guide exists if fd -t f "celestia-node-troubleshooting.md" how-to-guides; then echo "The troubleshooting guide exists in the new location." else echo "Warning: The troubleshooting guide was not found in the expected location." fi # Test: Check for the presence of the #ports section in the new location if rg -q "^#+\s+ports" how-to-guides/celestia-node-troubleshooting.md; then echo "The #ports section was found in the troubleshooting guide." else echo "Warning: The #ports section was not found in the troubleshooting guide." fi # Test: Check for any remaining references to the old path if rg -q "../nodes/celestia-node-troubleshooting.md" .; then echo "Warning: Found references to the old troubleshooting guide path. These may need to be updated." else echo "No references to the old troubleshooting guide path were found." fi
12-12: LGTM! Verify the new link.The link update from
../nodes/quick-start.mdto../how-to-guides/quick-start.mdaligns with the diataxis framework implementation. This change improves the organization of the documentation.Please run the following script to verify the existence of the new quick-start guide location:
how-to-guides/bubs-testnet.md (3)
Line range hint
1-100: Overall, the changes in this file look good and align with the diataxis implementation.The link updates in this file contribute to the reorganization of the documentation structure as per the diataxis framework. The changes maintain the integrity of the document while improving its categorization.
To ensure the overall consistency of the documentation structure, please run the following script to check for any inconsistencies in the link patterns across the documentation:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for inconsistent link patterns in the documentation # Test: Search for links that don't follow the new structure rg --type md -e '\[.*\]\(/developers/.*\)' -e '\[.*\]\(.*nodes/.*\)' how-to-guidesIf this script returns any results, it indicates that there might be some links that haven't been updated to the new structure. Please review and update these links as necessary to maintain consistency across the documentation.
26-26: LGTM! Verify the new link path.The update of the Mocha testnet link from "../nodes/mocha-testnet.md" to "../how-to-guides/mocha-testnet.md" is consistent with the diataxis framework implementation. This change appropriately categorizes the content under the "how-to-guides" section while maintaining the relative path structure.
Please run the following script to verify the existence of the new file path and check for any remaining references to the old path:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new file path and check for old references # Test 1: Check if the new file exists if fd -t f "mocha-testnet.md" how-to-guides; then echo "New file 'mocha-testnet.md' found in 'how-to-guides' directory." else echo "Warning: New file 'mocha-testnet.md' not found in 'how-to-guides' directory." fi # Test 2: Search for any remaining references to the old path if rg --type md "nodes/mocha-testnet.md"; then echo "Warning: Found references to the old path 'nodes/mocha-testnet.md'. Please update these." else echo "No references to the old path 'nodes/mocha-testnet.md' found." fi
5-5: LGTM! Verify the new link path.The update of the "Ethereum fallback mechanism" link from "/developers/ethereum-fallback" to "/how-to-guides/ethereum-fallback" aligns with the diataxis framework implementation. This change appropriately categorizes the content under the "how-to-guides" section.
Please run the following script to verify the existence of the new file path and check for any remaining references to the old path:
✅ Verification successful
Link path verified successfully.
The "Ethereum fallback mechanism" link has been correctly updated to "/how-to-guides/ethereum-fallback", and no references to the old path "/developers/ethereum-fallback" were found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new file path and check for old references # Test 1: Check if the new file exists if fd -t f "ethereum-fallback.md" how-to-guides; then echo "New file 'ethereum-fallback.md' found in 'how-to-guides' directory." else echo "Warning: New file 'ethereum-fallback.md' not found in 'how-to-guides' directory." fi # Test 2: Search for any remaining references to the old path if rg --type md "/developers/ethereum-fallback"; then echo "Warning: Found references to the old path '/developers/ethereum-fallback'. Please update these." else echo "No references to the old path '/developers/ethereum-fallback' found." fiLength of output: 575
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new file path and check for old references # Test 1: Check if the new file exists if fd -t f "ethereum-fallback.md" how-to-guides; then echo "New file 'ethereum-fallback.md' found in 'how-to-guides' directory." else echo "Warning: New file 'ethereum-fallback.md' not found in 'how-to-guides' directory." fi # Test 2: Search for any remaining references to the old path if rg --type md "\/developers\/ethereum-fallback" .; then echo "Warning: Found references to the old path '/developers/ethereum-fallback'. Please update these." else echo "No references to the old path '/developers/ethereum-fallback' found." fiLength of output: 538
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new file path and check for old references # Test 1: Check if the new file exists if fd -t f "ethereum-fallback.md" how-to-guides; then echo "New file 'ethereum-fallback.md' found in 'how-to-guides' directory." else echo "Warning: New file 'ethereum-fallback.md' not found in 'how-to-guides' directory." fi # Test 2: Search for any remaining references to the old path if rg --type md '/developers/ethereum-fallback' .; then echo "Warning: Found references to the old path '/developers/ethereum-fallback'. Please update these." else echo "No references to the old path '/developers/ethereum-fallback' found." fiLength of output: 436
how-to-guides/celestia-node-metrics.md (2)
Line range hint
1-100: Overall assessment: Documentation improvement with minimal changes.The update to the tutorial link appears to be the only significant change in this file. The rest of the content remains unchanged and continues to provide clear instructions for running metrics on a Celestia node. The documentation structure and clarity have been slightly improved with this update.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~9-~9: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...s on running metrics for a light node. This tutorial assumes you have already setup...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
12-12: Approve the updated tutorial link and verify its correctness.The change from
./developers/node-tutorial.mdto./tutorials/node-tutorial.mdappears to be part of a documentation restructuring. This new path is more intuitive, placing the tutorial in a dedicated 'tutorials' directory.Please run the following script to verify the existence of the new tutorial path and ensure there are no broken links:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: Updated Tutorial Link is Correct
The new tutorial file
node-tutorial.mdhas been successfully moved to thetutorialsdirectory, and there are no remaining references to the old pathdevelopers/node-tutorial.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the new tutorial path and check for any references to the old path. # Test 1: Check if the new tutorial file exists if fd -t f "node-tutorial.md" tutorials; then echo "New tutorial file found in the 'tutorials' directory." else echo "Warning: New tutorial file not found in the 'tutorials' directory." fi # Test 2: Check for any remaining references to the old path if rg -i "developers/node-tutorial" .; then echo "Warning: Found references to the old tutorial path. These may need to be updated." else echo "No references to the old tutorial path found." fiLength of output: 322
how-to-guides/blobstream-x-requesting-data-commitment-ranges.md (2)
Line range hint
1-100: Summary: Changes align with diataxis implementation.The modifications to this file, including its new location and the updated links, are consistent with the PR objective of implementing the diataxis framework for documentation organization. The content remains largely unchanged, ensuring that the existing information is preserved while improving the overall structure of the documentation.
Key points:
- The file has been moved to the "how-to-guides" section, aligning with the diataxis structure.
- Internal and external links have been updated to reflect the new organization.
- The core content and instructions remain intact, maintaining the document's value to users.
These changes contribute to a more organized and accessible documentation structure, as intended by the diataxis implementation.
57-57: LGTM! Verify the external link.The update of the link from "https://docs.celestia.org/nodes/mainnet#integrations" to "https://docs.celestia.org/how-to-guides/mainnet#integrations" is consistent with the PR objective of implementing the diataxis framework. This change correctly reflects the reorganization of the Celestia documentation.
As this is an external link, we can't directly verify its existence in our repository. Please manually check that the new URL is correct and accessible. You can use the following curl command to verify the link:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the accessibility of the new Celestia documentation link # Test: Check if the new URL is accessible if curl -s --head https://docs.celestia.org/how-to-guides/mainnet | grep "200 OK" > /dev/null; then echo "The new Celestia documentation link is accessible." else echo "Warning: The new Celestia documentation link may not be accessible. Please verify manually." fiIf the link is not yet live, coordinate with the Celestia team to ensure it will be available when these changes are published.
tutorials/integrate-celestia.md (2)
21-21: LGTM! Verify the new link path.The update of the nodes overview link from "../nodes/overview.md" to "../how-to-guides/nodes-overview.md" is in line with the diataxis framework implementation. This change should improve the organization and accessibility of the documentation.
Please run the following script to verify the existence of the new path:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the new nodes overview path # Test: Check if the new nodes overview file exists fd -t f "nodes-overview.md" how-to-guides
5-5: LGTM! Verify the new link path.The update of the wallets resource link from "/developers/wallets" to "/tutorials/wallets" aligns with the PR objectives of implementing the diataxis framework. This change should improve the organization of the documentation.
Please run the following script to verify the existence of the new path:
how-to-guides/intro-to-op-stack.md (1)
5-5: LGTM! Link updated correctly.The link update from "/developers/arbitrum-bridge" to "/how-to-guides/arbitrum-bridge" aligns with the PR objective of implementing the diataxis framework for documentation organization. This change reflects the new structure where "how-to guides" are a distinct category.
To ensure consistency across the documentation, let's verify if similar changes have been made in other files:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Link updates are consistent across documentation.
All references to the old link structure have been successfully updated to
/how-to-guides/arbitrum-bridge. No other instances of/developers/links were found, ensuring consistency with the diataxis framework implementation.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old link structure and verify the new structure is consistently used. # Test 1: Search for any remaining references to the old link structure echo "Searching for any remaining references to '/developers/arbitrum-bridge':" rg --type md '/developers/arbitrum-bridge' # Test 2: Verify the new link structure is used consistently echo "Verifying the usage of the new link structure '/how-to-guides/arbitrum-bridge':" rg --type md '/how-to-guides/arbitrum-bridge' # Test 3: Check for any other links that might need updating from '/developers/' to '/how-to-guides/' echo "Checking for other potential links that might need updating:" rg --type md '(/developers/[^"]+)'Length of output: 668
how-to-guides/optimism.md (2)
Line range hint
1-141: LGTM: Overall content is well-structured and consistent.The guide provides clear instructions for running an OP Stack rollup with Celestia. The content is well-organized, covering dependency setup, devnet deployment, and testnet deployment. The unchanged portions of the document remain consistent with the guide's purpose and the PR objectives.
18-18: LGTM: Link updated correctly.The link to the Celestia node documentation has been updated from
../nodes/celestia-node.mdto../how-to-guides/celestia-node.md. This change aligns with the PR objectives of implementing the diataxis framework and reorganizing the documentation structure.To ensure the link is correct and the file exists in the new location, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Link updated correctly.
The
celestia-node.mdfile exists in thehow-to-guidesdirectory, and there are no remaining references to the old path../nodes/celestia-node.md.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the celestia-node.md file in the how-to-guides directory # Test: Check if the file exists in the new location if fd -t f "celestia-node.md" "how-to-guides"; then echo "celestia-node.md found in how-to-guides directory" else echo "Error: celestia-node.md not found in how-to-guides directory" exit 1 fi # Test: Check for any remaining references to the old path if rg -q "../nodes/celestia-node.md" .; then echo "Warning: Found references to old path '../nodes/celestia-node.md'" rg "../nodes/celestia-node.md" . else echo "No references to old path found" fiLength of output: 289
how-to-guides/blobstreamx.md (1)
8-8: LGTM! Verify link functionality after deployment.The update of the "Requesting data commitment ranges" link from the "developers" to the "how-to-guides" section is in line with the diataxis framework implementation. This change should enhance content organization and user navigation.
To ensure no broken links are introduced, please run the following script after deployment:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the updated link is valid and the old link redirects or returns a 404. # Test: Check if the new link exists curl -I https://docs.celestia.org/how-to-guides/blobstream-x-requesting-data-commitment-ranges # Test: Ensure the old link either redirects or returns a 404 curl -I https://docs.celestia.org/developers/blobstream-x-requesting-data-commitment-rangeshow-to-guides/celestia-node.md (1)
Line range hint
109-139: Approved: Updated reference path for node RPC CLI tutorial.The change in the reference path from '../developers/node-tutorial.md' to '../tutorials/node-tutorial.md' aligns with the PR objectives of implementing diataxis and restructuring the documentation.
To ensure the new path is correct and no links are broken, please run the following verification script:
✅ Verification successful
Approved: Updated reference path for node RPC CLI tutorial.
The new tutorial file exists in the 'tutorials' directory, and there are no remaining references to the old path.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the new tutorial path and check for any remaining references to the old path. # Test 1: Check if the new tutorial file exists if fd -t f "node-tutorial.md" tutorials; then echo "New tutorial file found in the 'tutorials' directory." else echo "Error: New tutorial file not found in the 'tutorials' directory." fi # Test 2: Check for any remaining references to the old path if rg -i "developers/node-tutorial" --type md; then echo "Warning: Found references to the old tutorial path. Please update these references." else echo "No references to the old tutorial path found." fiLength of output: 330
how-to-guides/full-storage-node.md (3)
Line range hint
1-200: Overall, excellent improvements to the document structure and clarity.The changes in this file consistently align with the PR objectives of implementing diataxis:
- The updated link structure reflects a more organized documentation hierarchy.
- The addition of network-specific instructions improves clarity and reduces potential user errors.
- The new tip about Arabica devnet tokens provides valuable context for users working on sovereign rollups.
These modifications enhance the accessibility and usability of the documentation, which is a key goal of the diataxis framework. The changes are well-executed and require only minor refinements.
93-94: LGTM! Verify the new cel-key instructions link.The update to the
cel-keyinstructions link aligns with the diataxis implementation. Moving this content to the "tutorials" section is appropriate for step-by-step guides.Let's verify that the new link is correct and accessible:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the cel-key instructions at the new location. # Test: Check if the file exists at the new location fd -t f "celestia-node-key.md" tutorials # Test: Grep for content related to cel-key in the file fd -t f "celestia-node-key.md" tutorials -x grep -n "cel-key" {}
76-77: LGTM! Verify the new troubleshooting link.The update to the troubleshooting link aligns with the diataxis implementation. The new structure appears more logical, grouping troubleshooting under "how-to-guides".
Let's verify that the new link is correct and accessible:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Needed: Troubleshooting Page Missing or Mislinked
The
celestia-node-troubleshooting.mdfile was not found in thehow-to-guidesdirectory, and the previous grep command encountered an error. Please verify the file's location or its existence.
Verification Successful: Troubleshooting Link is Correct
The
celestia-node-troubleshooting.mdfile exists in thehow-to-guidesdirectory and contains the#portssection. The updated troubleshooting link is correct and functions as intended.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the troubleshooting page at the new location. # Test: Check if the file exists at the new location fd -t f "celestia-node-troubleshooting.md" how-to-guides # Test: Grep for the "#ports" section in the file fd -t f "celestia-node-troubleshooting.md" how-to-guides -x grep -n "#ports" {}Length of output: 1852
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the troubleshooting page and verify the presence of the "#ports" section. # Find all occurrences of 'celestia-node-troubleshooting.md' in the repository fd -t f "celestia-node-troubleshooting.md" # If the file is found, search for the "#ports" section within it fd -t f "celestia-node-troubleshooting.md" --exec grep -n "#ports" {}Length of output: 214
how-to-guides/feegrant-for-blobs.md (4)
Line range hint
1-170: Overall assessment: Documentation improvements align with diataxis framework.The changes made to this file successfully enhance the clarity, accuracy, and usability of the FeeGrant module documentation. The modifications align well with the PR objectives of implementing the diataxis framework, contributing to a more structured and accessible documentation system.
Key improvements include:
- Updated installation guide link
- Clarified introduction and role descriptions
- Streamlined instructions for granting fee allowances
- Enhanced command examples for using FeeGrant allowances
- Retained and formatted optional sections for comprehensive coverage
These changes collectively improve the user experience for developers working with the FeeGrant module on the Celestia Mocha testnet.
Line range hint
108-170: Acknowledge retention and formatting of optional sections.The optional sections for revoking permissions, submitting blobs from file input, and using
celestia-appdhave been retained with minor formatting adjustments. This ensures comprehensive coverage of the FeeGrant module functionality.To ensure the accuracy and formatting of the optional sections:
#!/bin/bash # Display the content of the optional sections for manual verification sed -n '/^## Optional:/,/$/p' how-to-guides/feegrant-for-blobs.md
Line range hint
18-26: Acknowledge clarity improvements in the introduction.The introduction has been rephrased for better clarity, emphasizing the roles of granter and grantee accounts. This aligns with the goal of enhancing documentation accessibility.
To ensure no unintended changes were made:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: No unintended code changes detected in the introduction section.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Display the content of the introduction section for manual verification sed -n '/^## Introduction/,/^##/p' how-to-guides/feegrant-for-blobs.mdLength of output: 741
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any occurrences of 'sed' in the entire markdown file to identify unintended additions grep -n 'sed' how-to-guides/feegrant-for-blobs.mdLength of output: 192
Line range hint
63-106: Acknowledge clarifications in FeeGrant usage examples.The section on using a FeeGrant allowance has been clarified, particularly in the command examples for submitting blobs and checking balances. This improvement enhances the document's usability for developers.
To ensure the accuracy of the clarified examples:
how-to-guides/celestia-app-metrics.md (1)
5-5: Link updated to reflect new documentation structure.The link has been updated from "/nodes/celestia-node-troubleshooting" to "/how-to-guides/celestia-node-troubleshooting", which aligns with the implementation of the diataxis framework for documentation organization. This change is consistent with the PR objectives.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce broken links, let's run a verification script:
This script will help identify any remaining references to the old path, verify the existence of the new file, and check for any other references that might need updating.
✅ Verification successful
Link update verified successfully.
All references to "/nodes/celestia-node-troubleshooting" have been updated to "/how-to-guides/celestia-node-troubleshooting", and the new path exists without introducing any broken links.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential broken links related to the changed path # Test 1: Search for any remaining references to the old path echo "Searching for remaining references to the old path:" rg --type md "/nodes/celestia-node-troubleshooting" # Test 2: Verify the existence of the new path echo "Verifying the existence of the new path:" fd --type f "celestia-node-troubleshooting.md" how-to-guides # Test 3: Check for any other references that might need updating echo "Checking for other potential references that might need updating:" rg --type md "celestia-node-troubleshooting"Length of output: 3023
tutorials/rust-client-tutorial.md (4)
Line range hint
14-180: The tutorial content is well-structured and informative.The unchanged portions of the tutorial provide clear instructions and relevant code examples for using the Celestia RPC client in Rust. The content covers key aspects such as project setup, submitting and retrieving blobs, subscribing to new headers, and fetching an Extended Data Square (EDS). This comprehensive coverage aligns well with the tutorial's objectives.
Line range hint
1-180: Summary: Changes successfully implement diataxis framework.The modifications to this file effectively contribute to the implementation of the diataxis framework as outlined in the PR objectives. The updated link paths in the frontmatter and installation instructions reflect a more organized documentation structure, improving navigability for users. The tutorial content remains high-quality and informative, covering essential aspects of using the Celestia RPC client in Rust.
These changes, along with similar updates across other documentation files, should significantly enhance the overall structure and accessibility of the project's documentation, aligning well with the goals stated in issue #1534.
11-12: LGTM: Updated installation guide links align with diataxis structure.The changes to the installation guide links, moving them from the "nodes" directory to "how-to-guides", are consistent with the diataxis framework implementation. This reorganization should improve the documentation's navigability.
Let's verify the existence of the new paths and check for any remaining occurrences of the old paths:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the new paths exist fd -t f "environment.md" how-to-guides fd -t f "celestia-node.md" how-to-guides # Check for any remaining occurrences of the old paths rg "../nodes/environment.md" -t md rg "../nodes/celestia-node.md" -t md
4-4: LGTM: Updated link path aligns with diataxis structure.The change from "/developers/prompt-scavenger" to "/tutorials/prompt-scavenger" is consistent with the PR's objective to implement the diataxis framework for documentation organization.
Let's verify if the new path exists and if there are any other occurrences of the old path:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: The new link path "/tutorials/prompt-scavenger" exists and no references to the old path remain.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the new path exists fd -t f "prompt-scavenger.md" tutorials # Check for any remaining occurrences of the old path rg "/developers/prompt-scavenger" -t mdLength of output: 211
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the new path exists fd -t f "prompt-scavenger.md" tutorials # Check for any remaining occurrences of the old path rg "/developers/prompt-scavenger" -t mdLength of output: 109
how-to-guides/instantiate-testnet.md (5)
Line range hint
1-21: LGTM: Improved clarity in introduction and setup instructionsThe changes in the introduction and setup sections enhance the guide's clarity. The addition of the celestia-app installation section is particularly helpful for users following this guide.
Line range hint
47-59: LGTM: Improved key creation instructionsThe streamlined instructions for creating a new key maintain clarity while emphasizing the importance of saving the output. This change will help users avoid potential issues related to lost key information.
Line range hint
83-104: LGTM: Improved clarity for genesis transaction creationThe changes in this section provide clearer instructions for creating the genesis transaction, especially regarding the
$STAKING_AMOUNTrequirement. The emphasized note for other validators is crucial for multi-validator setups.
Line range hint
1-191: Overall: Significant improvements to the Celestia testnet instantiation guideThe changes made to this guide have greatly enhanced its clarity, structure, and completeness. Key improvements include:
- Clearer setup instructions and dependencies
- More detailed explanations of commands and variables
- Improved structure for multi-validator setups
- Enhanced network configuration and peering instructions
These changes will make it easier for users to successfully set up and run a Celestia testnet.
Line range hint
179-191: Verify the updated troubleshooting page pathThe updated reference to the troubleshooting page is helpful. However, please ensure that the new path
../how-to-guides/celestia-node-troubleshooting.md#portsis correct and accessible.Run the following script to verify the existence of the troubleshooting page:
✅ Verification successful
Path to troubleshooting page is valid
The updated path
../how-to-guides/celestia-node-troubleshooting.md#portsis correct and accessible.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the celestia-node troubleshooting page # Test: Check if the file exists fd -t f celestia-node-troubleshooting.mdLength of output: 89
how-to-guides/light-node.md (4)
Line range hint
1-221: Overall improvement in documentation structure.The changes made to this file consistently update links to reflect the new diataxis-based documentation structure. These updates should improve navigation and organization of the Celestia documentation, making it easier for users to find relevant information.
117-117: LGTM! Verify the updated link tocel-keyutility documentation.The updated link to the
cel-keyutility documentation aligns with the diataxis framework implementation. Moving this content to the "tutorials" section is appropriate.Please run the following script to verify the existence of the linked file:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the linked cel-key utility documentation # Test: Check if the file exists fd -p "tutorials/celestia-node-key.md"
152-152: LGTM! Verify the updated link to the node tutorial.The updated link to the node tutorial aligns with the diataxis framework implementation. The preservation of the anchor link is good for maintaining specific references.
Please run the following script to verify the existence of the linked file and the presence of the anchor:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the linked node tutorial and the presence of the anchor # Test 1: Check if the file exists fd -p "tutorials/node-tutorial.md" # Test 2: Check if the anchor exists in the file rg --type md "^#+\s+Get your account address" tutorials/node-tutorial.md
93-93: LGTM! Verify the updated link.The updated link to the troubleshooting page aligns with the diataxis framework implementation. This change improves the organization of the documentation.
Please run the following script to verify the existence of the linked file:
✅ Verification successful
Verified the updated link.
The updated link to the troubleshooting page is correct and functional.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the linked troubleshooting file # Test: Check if the file exists fd -p "how-to-guides/celestia-node-troubleshooting.md"Length of output: 166
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find the current path of the Celestia node troubleshooting guide. # Search for files related to "celestia-node-troubleshooting" fd "celestia-node-troubleshooting" --type f --extension mdLength of output: 105
how-to-guides/bridge-node.md (2)
139-139: LGTM: Updated cel-key instructions linkThe link to the
cel-keyinstructions has been appropriately updated to reflect the new documentation structure. This change is consistent with the PR objective of implementing the diataxis framework, moving the instructions to a dedicated tutorials section.To ensure the link is valid, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence of the celestia-node-key file in the tutorials directory if fd -t f "celestia-node-key" | grep -q "tutorials"; then echo "celestia-node-key file found in the tutorials directory" else echo "Error: celestia-node-key file not found in the tutorials directory" fi
Line range hint
1-239: Overall changes look good, consider a comprehensive link checkThe updates to the documentation links in this file are consistent with the PR objective of implementing the diataxis framework. The changes improve the overall structure and organization of the documentation.
To ensure all internal links have been updated correctly, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining internal links that might need updating echo "Checking for potential outdated internal links:" rg -i '\[.*\]\((?!https?://|#).*\)' how-to-guides/bridge-node.mdThis script will display any internal links in the file. Please review the output to ensure all links have been updated to reflect the new documentation structure.
learn/staking-governance-supply.md (3)
56-56: LGTM! Verify the new link path.The updated link for submitting and voting on governance proposals aligns with the diataxis framework implementation. This change contributes to a more organized and intuitive documentation structure.
Please run the following script to verify the existence of the new file path and the presence of the governance section:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence of the new celestia-app-commands file and governance section if [ -f "how-to-guides/celestia-app-commands.md" ]; then echo "New celestia-app-commands file exists." if grep -q "# Governance" "how-to-guides/celestia-app-commands.md"; then echo "Governance section found in the file." else echo "Warning: Governance section not found in how-to-guides/celestia-app-commands.md" fi else echo "Warning: New celestia-app-commands file not found at how-to-guides/celestia-app-commands.md" fi
66-66: LGTM! Verify the new link path.The updated link for submitting a governance proposal to spend community pool funds aligns with the diataxis framework implementation. This change contributes to the overall improvement of the documentation structure.
Please run the following script to verify the existence of the new file path and the presence of the community pool section:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence of the new celestia-app-commands file and community pool section if [ -f "how-to-guides/celestia-app-commands.md" ]; then echo "New celestia-app-commands file exists." if grep -q "# Community Pool" "how-to-guides/celestia-app-commands.md"; then echo "Community Pool section found in the file." else echo "Warning: Community Pool section not found in how-to-guides/celestia-app-commands.md" fi else echo "Warning: New celestia-app-commands file not found at how-to-guides/celestia-app-commands.md" fi
Line range hint
30-66: Overall LGTM! Comprehensive link check recommended.The changes in this file consistently update links to reflect the new documentation structure, aligning well with the PR objectives of implementing the diataxis framework. This should improve the organization and accessibility of the documentation.
To ensure a smooth transition:
- Perform a comprehensive check of all updated links to verify they are correct and functional.
- Consider implementing redirects from the old paths to the new ones to prevent any potential broken links for users who might have bookmarked the old URLs.
- Update any other documentation or references that might be pointing to the old file structure.
Please run the following script to perform a comprehensive check of all updated links in this file:
#!/bin/bash # Comprehensive link check for learn/staking-governance-supply.md echo "Checking links in learn/staking-governance-supply.md" # Array of links to check links=( "how-to-guides/staking.md" "how-to-guides/celestia-app-commands.md" ) # Check each link for link in "${links[@]}"; do if [ -f "$link" ]; then echo "✅ File exists: $link" # Check for specific sections in celestia-app-commands.md if [[ $link == *"celestia-app-commands.md" ]]; then if grep -q "# Governance" "$link"; then echo " ✅ Governance section found in $link" else echo " ❌ Warning: Governance section not found in $link" fi if grep -q "# Community Pool" "$link"; then echo " ✅ Community Pool section found in $link" else echo " ❌ Warning: Community Pool section not found in $link" fi fi else echo "❌ Warning: File not found: $link" fi done echo "Link check completed."how-to-guides/docker-images.md (3)
119-119: LGTM: Updated link to "celestia-node tutorial"The link has been correctly updated to reflect the new documentation structure. This change is consistent with the previous update, moving content from the "developers" section to the "tutorials" section.
Please run the following script to verify the new link:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence of the new tutorial file and the presence of the "connect to a core endpoint" section # Check if the file exists if [ -f "../tutorials/node-tutorial.md" ]; then echo "File exists: ../tutorials/node-tutorial.md" # Check if the file contains the "connect to a core endpoint" section if grep -q "connect to a core endpoint" "../tutorials/node-tutorial.md"; then echo "Connect to a core endpoint section found in the file" else echo "Warning: Connect to a core endpoint section not found in the file" fi else echo "Error: File not found: ../tutorials/node-tutorial.md" fi
Line range hint
1-280: Summary: Documentation structure updatesThe changes in this file are limited to updating two links, reflecting a reorganization of the documentation structure. Both updates move content from the "developers" section to the "tutorials" section, which should improve the overall organization and accessibility of the documentation.
Key points:
- The core instructions for using Docker with Celestia Node remain unchanged, maintaining consistency for users.
- The link updates are consistent with each other, indicating a systematic reorganization.
To ensure all links in this file are up-to-date, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Check all markdown links in the file # Function to check if a file exists check_file() { if [ -f "$1" ]; then echo "File exists: $1" else echo "Error: File not found: $1" fi } # Check all relative links grep -oP '\]\(\K[^)]+(?=\))' how-to-guides/docker-images.md | while read -r link; do if [[ $link == ../* ]]; then check_file "${link%%#*}" fi done echo "Link check completed."This script will help identify any other links that might need updating due to the documentation restructuring.
31-31: LGTM: Updated link to "Docker andcel-keysection"The link has been correctly updated to reflect the new documentation structure. This change improves organization by moving the content from the "developers" section to the "tutorials" section.
Please run the following script to verify the new link:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Updated link to "Docker and
cel-keysection"The new link
../tutorials/celestia-node-key.md#docker-and-cel-keycorrectly points to the existing section.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence of the new tutorial file and the presence of the Docker and cel-key section # Check if the file exists if [ -f "../tutorials/celestia-node-key.md" ]; then echo "File exists: ../tutorials/celestia-node-key.md" # Check if the file contains the Docker and cel-key section if grep -q "Docker and \`cel-key\`" "../tutorials/celestia-node-key.md"; then echo "Docker and cel-key section found in the file" else echo "Warning: Docker and cel-key section not found in the file" fi else echo "Error: File not found: ../tutorials/celestia-node-key.md" fiLength of output: 1504
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the location of celestia-node-key.md within the repository # Use fd to find the file fd --type f "celestia-node-key.md" # If found, check for the Docker and cel-key section found_files=$(fd --type f "celestia-node-key.md") if [ -n "$found_files" ]; then for file in $found_files; do echo "File found: $file" if grep -q "Docker and \`cel-key\`" "$file"; then echo "Docker and cel-key section found in $file" else echo "Warning: Docker and cel-key section not found in $file" fi done else echo "Error: celestia-node-key.md not found in the repository." fiLength of output: 519
tutorials/celestia-node-key.md (7)
5-5: LGTM: Link update aligns with diataxis framework.The change from "/developers/blobstream-x-deploy" to "/how-to-guides/blobstream-x-deploy" is consistent with the PR objective of implementing the diataxis framework for documentation organization. This update improves the structure and accessibility of the documentation.
17-17: LGTM: Consistent link update for prerequisites.The update of the "Setting up your environment" link to "../how-to-guides/environment.md" maintains consistency with the new documentation structure implemented as part of the diataxis framework.
61-61: LGTM: Consistent link update for troubleshooting page.The update of the troubleshooting page link to "../how-to-guides/celestia-node-troubleshooting.md" maintains consistency with the new documentation structure implemented as part of the diataxis framework.
171-171: LGTM: Consistent link update for Docker guide.The update of the Docker guide link to "../how-to-guides/docker-images.md" maintains consistency with the new documentation structure implemented as part of the diataxis framework.
194-194: LGTM: Consistent link update for ports section.The update of the ports section link to "../how-to-guides/celestia-node-troubleshooting.md" maintains consistency with the new documentation structure implemented as part of the diataxis framework.
198-198: LGTM: Consistent link update for chain ID section.The update of the chain ID section link to "../how-to-guides/celestia-node-troubleshooting.md" maintains consistency with the new documentation structure implemented as part of the diataxis framework.
Line range hint
1-338: Overall: Excellent implementation of diataxis framework.The changes in this file consistently update links to reflect the new documentation structure based on the diataxis framework. All references to related guides and troubleshooting pages now point to the appropriate "how-to-guides" section, improving the organization and accessibility of the documentation. These updates align perfectly with the PR objectives and will enhance the user experience when navigating through the Celestia documentation.
how-to-guides/arbitrum-integration.md (3)
Line range hint
1-24: LGTM: Introduction and overview sections are well-structured and informative.The updated introduction and overview provide a clear and concise explanation of the Celestia-Arbitrum integration. The addition of the image and the context about this being the first external contribution to Arbitrum Orbit enhances the reader's understanding of the integration's significance.
Line range hint
59-95: LGTM: Preimage Oracle and Blobstream X implementation sections are informative and well-structured.These sections provide detailed technical information about the integration's components. The content is accurate and helps readers understand the implementation details of the Preimage Oracle and Blobstream X in the context of the Celestia-Arbitrum integration.
Line range hint
1-121: Overall: Excellent improvements to the document structure and content.The changes made to this document significantly enhance its clarity, structure, and informativeness. The implementation of the diataxis framework is evident in the improved organization of content, making it easier for readers to navigate and understand the Celestia-Arbitrum integration.
Key improvements include:
- Addition of a clear table of contents
- Introduction of the new "Ethereum fallback mechanism in Nitro" section
- Enhanced explanations in the DA provider implementation section
- Better overall flow and readability of the document
These changes align well with the PR objectives and will greatly benefit users seeking to understand and implement the Celestia-Arbitrum integration.
community/foundation-delegation-program.md (1)
73-73: Improved link to OTEL collector guideThe update to the OTEL collector link, directing to a how-to guide instead of a metrics page, aligns well with the diataxis framework implementation. This change provides more practical guidance for applicants, enhancing the documentation's usability.
how-to-guides/blobstream.md (2)
Line range hint
40-71: Excellent comparison of Blobstream and DACs!This section provides a clear and comprehensive comparison between Blobstream and data availability committees. The structure and content align well with diataxis principles, offering valuable explanations that help users understand the advantages of Blobstream.
Line range hint
147-161: LGTM! Verify the accuracy of contract addresses.The "Deployed contracts" section has been updated with new contract addresses for SP1 Blobstream on various EVM networks. The table provides comprehensive information, including links to block explorers and Celenium deployments, which is very helpful for developers.
To ensure the accuracy of this critical information:
Please run the following script to verify the contract addresses:
✅ Verification successful
All contract addresses have been successfully verified.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the accuracy of SP1 Blobstream contract addresses # Test: Check if the contract addresses match the expected values expected_addresses=( "0x7Cf3876F681Dbb6EdA8f6FfC45D66B996Df08fAe" "0xA83ca7775Bc2889825BcDeDfFa5b758cf69e8794" "0xA83ca7775Bc2889825BcDeDfFa5b758cf69e8794" "0xf0c6429ebab2e7dc6e05dafb61128be21f13cb1e" "0xc3e209eb245Fd59c8586777b499d6A665DF3ABD2" "0xc3e209eb245Fd59c8586777b499d6A665DF3ABD2" ) mismatches=0 for address in "${expected_addresses[@]}"; do if ! grep -q "$address" how-to-guides/blobstream.md; then echo "Mismatch found: $address not present in blobstream.md" mismatches=$((mismatches + 1)) fi done if [ $mismatches -eq 0 ]; then echo "All contract addresses verified successfully." else echo "Found $mismatches address mismatches. Please review and update." fiLength of output: 1176
how-to-guides/build-whatever.md (3)
27-27: LGTM: URL update for OP Stack guide is consistent with diataxis implementation.The URL change from "/developers/intro-to-op-stack" to "/how-to-guides/intro-to-op-stack" aligns with the PR objectives of implementing the diataxis framework. This update correctly categorizes the OP Stack guide under the "how-to-guides" section.
To ensure consistency across the documentation, let's verify that other references to this guide have been updated:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to the old URL path rg --type md '/developers/intro-to-op-stack' # Search for the new URL path to confirm its usage rg --type md '/how-to-guides/intro-to-op-stack'
Line range hint
1-28: Overall, the changes align well with the diataxis implementation.The URL updates for both the OP Stack and Arbitrum Orbit guides are consistent with the PR objectives of implementing the diataxis framework. These changes improve the organization of the documentation by correctly categorizing the guides under the "how-to-guides" section.
To ensure a smooth transition and prevent broken links:
- Verify that all internal links referencing these guides have been updated across the entire documentation.
- Consider setting up redirects from the old URLs to the new ones to maintain backwards compatibility for any external links.
- Update any related navigation menus or indexes to reflect the new URL structure.
Run the following script to perform a final check for any remaining references to the old URL structure:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to the old URL structure rg --type md '/developers/(intro-to-op-stack|arbitrum-integration)' # Verify the existence of the new guide files ls -l how-to-guides/intro-to-op-stack.md how-to-guides/arbitrum-integration.md # Check for any TODO comments related to URL updates rg --type md 'TODO.*URL'
28-28: LGTM: URL update for Arbitrum Orbit guide is consistent with diataxis implementation.The URL change from "/developers/arbitrum-integration" to "/how-to-guides/arbitrum-integration" aligns with the PR objectives of implementing the diataxis framework. This update correctly categorizes the Arbitrum Orbit guide under the "how-to-guides" section.
To ensure consistency across the documentation, let's verify that other references to this guide have been updated:
how-to-guides/arabica-devnet.md (2)
82-82: LGTM! Verify the updated link for consensus nodes.The link update for consensus nodes from '../nodes/full-consensus-node.md' to '../how-to-guides/consensus-node.md' appears to be correct and consistent with the document structure. This change should improve navigation for users.
Please run the following script to verify the existence and correctness of the new link:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the consensus node guide and check for any broken links. # Test 1: Check if the new consensus node guide exists if fd -t f "consensus-node.md" how-to-guides; then echo "consensus-node.md found in how-to-guides directory." else echo "Error: consensus-node.md not found in how-to-guides directory." fi # Test 2: Check for any remaining references to the old path if rg -i "nodes/full-consensus-node" .; then echo "Warning: Found references to the old path 'nodes/full-consensus-node'. Please update these as well." else echo "No references to the old path 'nodes/full-consensus-node' found." fi
Line range hint
1-24: Overall improvements to document clarity and structure.Based on the AI-generated summary, the document has undergone several beneficial changes:
- The introduction has been refined to clarify the purpose of Arabica devnet.
- The section on network stability and upgrades has been updated to set appropriate expectations.
- The RPC endpoints table has been reformatted for better readability.
- Instructions for using consensus endpoints with DA nodes have been expanded.
- The faucet section has been clarified with additional warnings and instructions.
These changes appear to enhance the overall quality and usefulness of the documentation.
To ensure the accuracy of these changes, please run the following script:
how-to-guides/validator-node.md (6)
37-37: LGTM! Verify the updated wallet guide link.The link update for the wallet creation guide aligns with the diataxis framework implementation. The new structure correctly places the wallet guide in the "how-to guides" section.
Please run the following script to verify the existence of the linked file:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence of the wallet guide file_path="how-to-guides/celestia-app-wallet.md" if [ -f "$file_path" ]; then echo "File exists: $file_path" else echo "File not found: $file_path" fi
240-240: LGTM! Verify the updated transaction indexer configuration link.The link update for the transaction indexer configuration options aligns with the diataxis framework implementation. The new structure correctly places this information in the "how-to guides" section of the consensus node documentation. The use of a root-relative path is consistent and preferred.
Please run the following script to verify the existence of the linked section:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence of the transaction indexer configuration section file_path="how-to-guides/consensus-node.md" if [ -f "$file_path" ]; then echo "File exists: $file_path" grep -n "optional-transaction-indexer-configuration-options" "$file_path" else echo "File not found: $file_path" fi
Line range hint
246-246: LGTM! Consider using root-relative paths for consistency. Verify the updated additional resources link.The link update for the additional resources aligns with the diataxis framework implementation. However, for consistency with other links in the document, consider using a root-relative path instead of a relative path.
Consider updating the link to use a root-relative path:
-[the extra resources for consensus nodessection of the consensus node page](./consensus-node.md#extra-resources-for-consensus-nodes). +[the extra resources for consensus nodes section of the consensus node page](/how-to-guides/consensus-node.md#extra-resources-for-consensus-nodes).Please run the following script to verify the existence of the linked section:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence of the extra resources section file_path="how-to-guides/consensus-node.md" if [ -f "$file_path" ]; then echo "File exists: $file_path" grep -n "extra-resources-for-consensus-nodes" "$file_path" else echo "File not found: $file_path" fi
Line range hint
33-246: Overall changes look good. Consider a consistency pass for link formats.The changes throughout the document align well with the diataxis framework implementation. The added content provides more detailed instructions for different scenarios, which is helpful for users.
However, there are inconsistencies in the use of relative and root-relative paths for internal links. Consider doing a consistency pass to standardize the link format throughout the document, preferably using root-relative paths for all internal links.
Please run the following script to check for inconsistencies in link formats:
#!/bin/bash # Check for inconsistencies in link formats echo "Relative links:" grep -n "\]\(\.\./" how-to-guides/validator-node.md echo "Root-relative links:" grep -n "\]\(/" how-to-guides/validator-node.md
120-120: LGTM! Verify the updated troubleshooting link. Consider using root-relative paths.The link update for the troubleshooting page aligns with the diataxis framework implementation. The new structure correctly places the troubleshooting guide in the "how-to guides" section.
However, consider using root-relative paths (starting with '/') instead of relative paths for consistency across the documentation and to prevent potential issues if the file structure changes.
Please run the following script to verify the existence of the linked file and the presence of the ports section:
✅ Verification successful
Please run the following script to verify the existence of the troubleshooting guide and the presence of the Ports section:
Verified the troubleshooting link.
The updated link correctly points to the "# Ports" section in the troubleshooting guide.
Consider using root-relative paths (starting with '/') for consistency across the documentation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence of the troubleshooting guide and the ports section file_path="how-to-guides/celestia-node-troubleshooting.md" if [ -f "$file_path" ]; then echo "File exists: $file_path" grep -n "# Ports" "$file_path" else echo "File not found: $file_path" fiLength of output: 338
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Verify the existence of the troubleshooting guide and the ports section file_path="how-to-guides/celestia-node-troubleshooting.md" if [ -f "$file_path" ]; then echo "File exists: $file_path" grep -n "# Ports" "$file_path" || echo "Section '# Ports' not found in $file_path" else echo "File not found: $file_path" fiLength of output: 326
33-33: LGTM! Verify the updated link.The link update aligns with the diataxis framework implementation. The new structure correctly places the consensus node setup guide in the "how-to guides" section.
Please run the following script to verify the existence and correctness of the linked file:
how-to-guides/ibc-relayer.md (2)
5-5: LGTM: Link update aligns with diataxis implementationThe update of the "Celestia Node Metrics" link from "/nodes/celestia-node-metrics" to "/how-to-guides/celestia-node-metrics" is consistent with the PR objective of implementing the diataxis framework. This change improves the organization of the documentation by placing the metrics guide in the appropriate "how-to-guides" section.
24-24: LGTM: Mocha testnet link update aligns with diataxis structureThe update of the Mocha testnet documentation link from "../nodes/mocha-testnet.md" to "../how-to-guides/mocha-testnet.md" is consistent with the PR objective of implementing the diataxis framework. This change appropriately categorizes the testnet setup guide under the "how-to-guides" section.
To ensure consistency across the documentation, please run the following script to check for any remaining references to the old path:
If the script returns any results, please update those references as well to maintain consistency throughout the documentation.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: All Mocha testnet links have been successfully updated
All references to the old path
"../nodes/mocha-testnet.md"have been removed. Links to the Mocha testnet documentation now correctly point to"../how-to-guides/mocha-testnet.md"or appropriate relative paths within thehow-to-guidesdirectory, ensuring consistency with the diataxis framework implementation.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old Mocha testnet path # Test: Search for old path references rg --type md '../nodes/mocha-testnet'Length of output: 37
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the old Mocha testnet path # Search for old path references in markdown files and display matching lines with file names rg --type md "../nodes/mocha-testnet.md" --with-filename --line-numberLength of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any remaining references to "mocha-testnet" in markdown files # Search for "mocha-testnet" in all markdown files and display matching lines with file names rg --type md 'mocha-testnet' --with-filename --line-numberLength of output: 3865
how-to-guides/celestia-app-vesting.md (7)
20-22: LGTM: Link updates align with diataxis implementation.The changes to the links are consistent with the PR objective of implementing the diataxis framework. The new structure, pointing to the 'how-to-guides' directory, appears more organized and better aligned with the how-to guide category.
312-315: LGTM: Consistent link updates throughout the document.These link updates maintain consistency with the earlier changes, further aligning the document with the diataxis framework implementation. The uniform structure improves navigation and readability across the guide.
346-346: LGTM: Consistent faucet link update.The faucet link update maintains consistency with the previous changes, further solidifying the document's alignment with the diataxis framework. This uniform approach to link structure enhances the overall coherence of the guide.
353-353: LGTM: Consistent RPC endpoints link update.The RPC endpoints link update maintains the consistent approach seen throughout the document. This change further reinforces the alignment with the diataxis framework, contributing to a more organized and navigable guide structure.
386-387: LGTM: Consistent link updates for validator and consensus node guides.The link updates for the validator and consensus node setup guides maintain the consistent approach seen throughout the document. This uniformity across different types of guides further solidifies the implementation of the diataxis framework, enhancing the overall structure and navigability of the documentation.
Line range hint
1-424: LGTM: Successful implementation of diataxis framework.The changes made to this document consistently update links to align with the diataxis framework, pointing to the 'how-to-guides' directory. This uniformity improves the overall organization and navigability of the guide. The document's structure and flow remain intact, and no apparent inconsistencies or issues were introduced by these changes. The updates successfully contribute to a more coherent and user-friendly documentation structure.
Line range hint
1-424: PR objectives successfully met for this file.The changes made to
how-to-guides/celestia-app-vesting.mdsuccessfully implement the diataxis framework as intended. All link updates are consistent, pointing to the 'how-to-guides' directory, which aligns with the new documentation structure. The document's content and overall flow remain intact while improving organization and navigability. These changes contribute positively to the larger documentation restructuring effort, enhancing user experience and accessibility as outlined in the PR objectives.tutorials/prompt-scavenger.md (4)
5-5: LGTM: Updated link to Rust client tutorialThe link update from
/developers/rust-client-tutorialto/tutorials/rust-client-tutorialaligns with the diataxis framework implementation mentioned in the PR objectives. This change improves the overall structure and navigation of the documentation.
32-33: LGTM: Updated dependency linksThe links for environment setup and light node installation have been correctly updated to point to the new
how-to-guidessection. This change is in line with the diataxis framework implementation and should improve the overall organization of the documentation.
38-38: LGTM: Updated Celestia Node installation linkThe link to install the celestia-node binary has been correctly updated to point to the new
how-to-guidessection. This change maintains consistency with the new documentation structure and should improve the user experience.
Line range hint
1-1: LGTM: Successfully updated tutorial to align with diataxis frameworkThe changes made to this tutorial successfully implement the diataxis framework by updating links and paths to reflect the new documentation structure. The tutorial content remains accurate and well-structured, providing a clear guide for users to create a Prompt Scavenger game using Celestia's Node API and OpenAI's GPT-3.5.
Key improvements:
- Updated links to related tutorials and guides
- Reorganized dependency and installation instructions
- Maintained consistency with the new "how-to guides" section
These changes should enhance the overall user experience and make it easier for developers to navigate through the documentation.
how-to-guides/blobstream-offchain.md (3)
Line range hint
56-93: LGTM! Well-defined structures for Span and Blockchain.The
Spanstructure is well-defined and includes all necessary fields to accurately locate rollup block data within a Celestia block. TheBlockchaintype appropriately represents the chain state with blocks, sequencer address, and namespace.The explanations provided for each structure are clear and informative, which will help developers understand the purpose and usage of these types in the context of Blobstream integration.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~108-~108: Consider using a more formal alternative.
Context: ...lestia.org/). Additionally, if you need more information on how to run a light node, you can [ch...(MORE_INFO)
Line range hint
162-196: LGTM! Comprehensive explanation of data commitment in Blobstream.This section provides a clear and accurate explanation of how rollups commit to data using Blobstream, effectively differentiating between optimistic and zk rollups. The inclusion of links to additional documentation, such as inclusion proofs and data square layout, is particularly helpful for readers seeking more in-depth information.
The content aligns well with the PR objectives of implementing diataxis by providing both explanatory content and references to more detailed information, enhancing the overall structure and accessibility of the documentation.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~108-~108: Consider using a more formal alternative.
Context: ...lestia.org/). Additionally, if you need more information on how to run a light node, you can [ch...(MORE_INFO)
Line range hint
1-365: Excellent guide on Blobstream integration, aligning well with diataxis framework.This comprehensive guide on integrating Layer 2 (L2) offchain logic with Blobstream is well-structured, technically accurate, and aligns perfectly with the PR objectives of implementing the diataxis framework. The document effectively combines explanatory text, code snippets, and links to additional resources, making it highly accessible and informative for developers working on L2 solutions.
Key strengths of the document:
- Clear explanations of complex concepts like rollups, data commitment, and block creation.
- Well-commented code snippets that illustrate the implementation details.
- Appropriate use of links to additional documentation for in-depth information.
- Logical flow of information, from basic structures to more complex operations.
The minor suggestions provided throughout the review (e.g., adding explanations for zero-knowledge proofs, improving error handling, and enhancing block validation) would further refine the already high-quality content.
This guide significantly enhances the documentation structure and accessibility, fulfilling the main objective of the PR to implement diataxis.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~108-~108: Consider using a more formal alternative.
Context: ...lestia.org/). Additionally, if you need more information on how to run a light node, you can [ch...(MORE_INFO)
how-to-guides/blobstream-x-deploy.md (1)
4-4: LGTM: Updated link for Celestia-node key guideThe link update from
/developers/celestia-node-keyto/tutorials/celestia-node-keyappears to be part of a documentation restructuring. This change improves navigation and categorization of the guides.how-to-guides/blobstream-rollups.md (5)
5-5: Link update looks good.The link for "Ethereum fallback mechanism" has been correctly updated to the new path structure, aligning with the diataxis implementation.
8-8: Link update is correct.The link for "Submitting data blobs to Celestia" has been properly updated to the new path structure, consistent with the diataxis implementation.
59-59: Link update is correct.The link for "commitment scheme docs" has been properly updated to the new path structure, consistent with the diataxis implementation and previous link updates.
Line range hint
1-301: Overall, the changes look good and align with the PR objectives.The updates to this file successfully implement the diataxis framework for documentation organization. All link changes are consistent with the new structure, and the content remains intact. The only minor suggestions are related to formatting (list indentation and line length), which are low-priority improvements.
Great job on maintaining consistency throughout the document while implementing these structural changes!
181-181: Link update is correct, but verify anchor format.The link for "data root inclusion proofs section" has been updated to the new path structure, consistent with the diataxis implementation. However, please verify that the anchor link format (#_1-data-root-inclusion-proof) is correct for the new documentation structure.
To verify the anchor link, you can run the following script:
If the script returns a match, the anchor link is correct. If not, you may need to adjust the anchor format.
tutorials/node-tutorial.md (1)
Line range hint
1-577: Excellent updates to the tutorial!The changes to this file significantly improve its quality as a tutorial for using the Celestia-node RPC API. The additions, clarifications, and restructuring make the content more comprehensive and easier to follow. The updated examples and new sections (like the one on posting SVGs) add practical value for users.
Great job on enhancing this documentation!
.vitepress/config.ts (3)
11-23: LGTM: Basic configuration looks goodThe initial configuration for the VitePress site is well-structured and includes all necessary basic settings such as language, title, description, and sitemap configuration.
252-279: LGTM: Navigation structure is well-organizedThe
navfunction creates a clear and well-structured navigation menu. It provides easy access to key sections of the documentation and includes a good mix of internal and external links. The use of nested items for the "Quick start" section helps maintain a clean top-level navigation.
281-858: LGTM: Sidebar structure aligns well with Diátaxis frameworkThe
sidebarHomefunction creates a comprehensive and well-organized sidebar navigation structure. It effectively implements the Diátaxis framework mentioned in the PR objectives by clearly separating content into distinct categories such as Learn, How-to guides, and Tutorials.Key points:
- The use of collapsible sections helps manage the complexity of the navigation.
- The structure provides easy access to a wide range of topics while maintaining clarity.
- The inclusion of external resources and community links enhances the overall value of the documentation.
This implementation should significantly improve the navigation and accessibility of the documentation, meeting the goals outlined in the linked issue #1534.
how-to-guides/blobstream-proof-queries.md (2)
Line range hint
1-10: LGTM: Well-structured introductionThe document starts with a clear title and description, setting the context for the guide. The structure with markdown headings is appropriate for a how-to guide.
Line range hint
39-114: LGTM: Comprehensive overview of proof queriesThis section provides a thorough explanation of the proof query process, including the Celestia square and commitment scheme. The use of diagrams significantly enhances the understanding of the complex concepts involved.
closes #1534
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Bug Fixes